[Bodnar, A. & Bojarski, L. (2011) ‘Judicial Independence in Poland’, in Anja Seibert-Fohr (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_17]Search in Google Scholar
[Bobek, Michal 2007. ‘Iudex Ex Machina : Institutional and Mental Transitions of Central and Eastern European Judiciairies’, in Coman Ramona and Jean-Michel De Waele (eds.), Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, Brugge: Vanden Broele.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brusis, M. 2005. European Union enlargement and the Europeanization of Eastern Europe: research puzzles and policy issues. In: Z. Mansfeldova, V. Sparschuh and A. Wenninger, eds. Patterns of Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe, Kramer: Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caporaso, J., et al., 2001. Transforming Europe. Europeanization and domestic change. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coman, R. And De Waele, J.M. 2007. Judicial reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, from a salient to a salient research topic. In: R. Coman and J.M. De Waele, eds. Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, Buges: Vanden Broele, 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coman, R. 2009. Reformer la justice dans un pays post-communiste. Le cas de la Roumanie, Bruxelles : Editions de l’Université.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dallara, C. 2007. ‘Challenges to the democratic judicial reform in Serbia: Legacy of the past, political actors interests and the EU vagueness’, in Coman R. & De Waele J.M. (eds). Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, Buges: Vanden Broele.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dallara, C. 2008. ‘Serbia: borderline democracy?’, in Morlino L. & Magen A. (eds) Democratization and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European post-communist countries, New York : Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Domingo, P. 1999. Judicial Independence and Judicial Reforms in Latin America. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London, 151-177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Febbrajo, A. 2010. Legal Cultures in Transition: A System-theory Approach. In: A. Febbrajo and W. Sadurski, eds. Central and Eastern Europe After Transition. Towards a New Socio-legal Semantics, Ashgate, 35-73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fleck, Z. et al, Opinion on the fundamental law of Hungary, June 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fleck, Zoltan 2011. ‘Judicial Independence in Hungary’, in Seibert-Fohr Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_19]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, B. 2004. History, Politics and Judicial Independence. In: S. Andras, ed. Judicial Integrity, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, Boston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elster, J. 1995. Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process, Duke Law Journal, 45 (2), 364-396.]Search in Google Scholar
[Epstein, R. A., 2005. ‘The paradoxes of enlargement’, European Political Research, Vol. 4, pp. 384-394.10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210045]Search in Google Scholar
[European Parliament, Resolution of 10 March 2011 on Media law in Hungary.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Parliament, debates, 17 January 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission for Democracy through Law, Opinion on the new Constitution of Hungary, no° 621/2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, Press Release, 7 March 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 1998. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 1999. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2001. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession, SEC(2001) 1748.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2002. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession, SEC(2002) 1404.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission, 2003. Comprehensive monitoring report on Hungary’s preparations for membership.]Search in Google Scholar
[EU Observer, MEPs voice ‘serious concern’ on Hungary’s democracy, 16 February 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[EU Observer, EU gives Hungary one month to fix laws, 7 March 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C. 2009. Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization, JCMS, 47 (3), 507-530.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ginsburg, Nuno and Garpupa, Tom 2009. “Guarding the Guardians. Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence”, American Journal of Comparative Law, 57, 201-232.10.5131/ajcl.2008.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Grabbe, H. 2001. How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6), 1013-1031.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grabbe, H. 2002. European Union Conditionality and the Acquis communautaire. International Political Science Review, 23 (3), 249-268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goetz, K. 2001. Making sense of post-communist central administration: modernization, Europeanization or Latinization?. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6), 1032-1051.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bankuti, M., Halmai G. Scheppele, K. L. 2012. Hungary’s Illiberal Turn. Disabling the Constitution, Journal of Democracy, 23 (3), 138-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammerslev, O. 2011. “The European Union and the United States in Eastern Europe: two ways of exporting law, expertise and state power”, in Y. Dezalay Y. & B. G. Garth (eds), Bryant Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization, Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haughton, T. 2007. When Does the EU Make a Difference? Conditionality and the Accession Process in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review, 5 (2), 233-246.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill, P., Knill, Ch., 2006. ‘It’s the Bureaucracy Stupid. The Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in the EU Candidate Countries, 1999-2003’, European Union Politics, 7, 4.10.1177/1465116506069442]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, J., Sasse, G., Gordon, C. 2004a. Conditionality and Compliance in the EU’s Eastward Enlargement: Regional Policy and the Reform of Sub-national Government. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (3), 523-551.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, J., Sasse, G., Gordon, C. 2004b. Europeanization and regionalization in the EU’s enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: the myth of conditionality, Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230503182]Search in Google Scholar
[Juncos, A. 2011. Europeanization by Decree? The case of Police Reform in Bosnia. JCMS, 49 (2), 367-389.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotzian, P., Knodt, M. and Urdze, S., Instruments of the EU’s external democracy promotion, JCMS, 49 (5), 923-1152.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02163.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kochenov, D. 2004. Behind the Copenhagen façade. The meaning and the structure of the Copenhagen Political Criterion of democracy and the rule of law. European Integration online Papers, 8 (10), 1-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kosar, D. 2010. ‘Judicial Accountability in the (Post)Transitional Context: A Story of the Czech Republic’, in Czarnota A. & Parmentier S. (eds) (2010).10.2139/ssrn.1689260]Search in Google Scholar
[Ladrech, R. 2010. Europeanization and National Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-06814-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Larkins, K. 1996. Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44 (4), 605-626.]Search in Google Scholar
[Magalhaes, P. C. 1999. The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 32 (1), 43-62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Melone, A. P. 1996. The Struggle for Judicial Independence and the Transition toward Democracy in Bulgaria. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29 (2), 231-243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Muller, J. W. 2013. Defending Democracy within the EU, Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 138-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Dwyer, C. 2006. Reforming Regional Governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or Domestic Politics as usual. East European Politics and Societies, 20(2), 219-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Open Society Institute 2001. Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Judicial Independence, Budapest.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parau, C. 2011. “The Drive for Judicial Supremacy”, in Anja Seibert-Fohr (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Papadimitriou, D. and Phinnemore, D. 2004. Europeanization, Conditionality and Domestic Change: The Twinning Exercice and Administrative Reform in Romania. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (3), 619-639.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pederzoli, P. And Piana, D. 2010. The Governance of the Judicial System in Europe. In: R. Coman and C. Dallara, eds. Handbook on Judicial Politics, Iasi: Institutul European, 89-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piana, D. 2010. Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice. Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Přibáň, J. 2004. Reconstituting Paradise Lost: Temporality, Civility, and Ethnicity in Post-CommunistConstitution-Making. Law & Society Review, 38 (3), 407-432.]Search in Google Scholar
[Přibáň, J. 2010. Constituting the Heterarchy of European Constitutionalism in the EU’s New Member States. In: In: A. Febbrajo and W. Sadurski, eds. Central and Eastern Europe After Transition. Towards a New Socio-legal Semantics, Ashgate, 13-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pridham, G. 2006. Assessing Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe: The European Dimension. Acta Politica, 41, 342-369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pogany, I. 1993. Constitutional Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary’s Transition to Democracy. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 42 (2), 332-355.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravinet, P. 2011. ‚La coordination européenne «à la bolognaise»‘ Revue française de science politique, 61, 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, J. T. 2006. Religion, Constitutional Courts, and Democracy in Former Communist Countries. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 129-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saurugger, S. (2012) “Beyond Non-Compliance with Legal Norms”, in Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C. M. (eds). Research Design in European Studies. Establishing Causality in Europeanization, New York: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sajo, A. 1995. Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15 (2), 253-267.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadurski, W. 2008. Solange, chapter 3’: Constitutional Courts in Central Europe—Democracy European Union. European Law Journal, 14 (1), 1-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schedler, A. 1999. Retraining the State: Conflicts and Agents of Accountabiity. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London, 333-351.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheppele, K. L. 2006. Guardians of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Ruleof Law in Post-Soviet Europe. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154 (6), 1757-1851.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S. and Knobel, H. 2003. Costs, Commitment and COmpliance : The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41 (3), 495–518.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. 2004. Governance by conditionality : EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (4), 661–679.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schönfelder, Bruno (2005). “Judicial Independence in Bulgaria: A Tale of Splendour and Misery”, Europe-Asia Studies, 57: 1, 61-92.10.1080/0966813052000314110]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, H. 1999. Surprising Success: The New Eastern European Constitutional Courts. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London, 195-217.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seleny, A. 1999. Old Political Rationalities and New Democracies: Compromise and Confrontation in Hungary and Poland. World Politics, 51, 484-519.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sticka, M. (2007) ‘Top-down control slows Czech judicial reform, despite EU impetus’ in Transparency International]Search in Google Scholar
[Spinner, M. 2005. Aspects of democracy. Democratic consolidation in Eastern Europe: old wine in new bottles?. European Political Science, 4, 443-453.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uitz, R. 2010. Hungary : high hopes revisited. In : L. Morlino and W. Sadurski, (eds) Democratization and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European post-communist countries, New York : Routledge, 45-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wuller, J.W. 2013. Defending Democracy within the EU, Journal of Democracy, 24 (2), 2013, 138-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolczuk, K. 2007. Constitutional Politics. In: S. White, J. Batt and Paul G. Lewis, eds. Developments in Central and East European Politics, Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
