Visualization of a Lifeboat Motion During Lowering Along Ship’s Side

1. Al-Hussein M., Niaz M. A., Yu H., Kim H., Integrating 3D visualization and simulation for tower crane operations on construction sites. Automation in Construction, 15(5), pp. 554-562, (2006).10.1016/j.autcon.2005.07.007Search in Google Scholar

2. Benzley S. E., Merkley K., Blacker T. D., Schoof L., Preand post-processing for the finite element method. Finite elements in analysis and design, 19(4), pp. 243-260, (1995).10.1016/0168-874X(94)00072-NSearch in Google Scholar

3. Craighead J., Murphy R., Burke J., Goldiez B., A survey of commercial & open source unmanned vehicle simulators. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 852-857, (2007).10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363092Search in Google Scholar

4. Dymarski P. Dymarski Cz., Computational model for simulation of lifeboat motions during its launching from ship in rough seas. Polish Maritime Research, Vol. 19 No. 3(75), pp. 45-52, DOI: 10.2478/v10012-012-0030-6, (2012).10.2478/v10012-012-0030-6,(2012)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Dymarski C., Dymarski P., Kniat A., Searching for critical conditions during lifeboat launching - simulations. Polish Maritime Research, Vol. 24 Special Issue 2017 S1 (93), pp. 53-58, DOI: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0021, (2017).10.1515/pomr-2017-0021,(2017)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Roboris, https://www.roboris.it/en/product/eureka-robot.Search in Google Scholar

7. Foley J. D., Van Dam A., Feiner S. K., Hughes J. F., PhillipsR. L., Introduction to computer graphics. Addison-Wesley, (1994). Search in Google Scholar

8. Haber R. B., Visualization techniques for engineering mechanics. Computing Systems in Engineering, 1(1), pp. 37-50, (1990).10.1016/0956-0521(90)90046-NSearch in Google Scholar

9. Jan S. V. S., Clapworthy G. J., Rooze M., Visualization of combined motions in human joints. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18(6), pp. 10-14, (1998).10.1109/38.734973Search in Google Scholar

10. Kamat V. R., Martinez J. C., Dynamic 3D visualization of articulated construction equipment. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 19(4), pp. 356-368, (2005).10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19:4(356)Search in Google Scholar

11. Kawasaki, https://robotics.kawasaki.com/en1/products/other/simulation-OLP/index.html.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kerlow I. V., The art of 3D: computer animation and effects. John Wiley & Sons, (2004).Search in Google Scholar

13. Bogdaniuk M., Kniat A., Puch W., Effective pre- and postprocessors for FEM strength analysis using AutoCAD possibilities. MARINE TECHNOLOGY III, Book Series: MARINE AND MARITIME edited by: Graczyk T., Jastrzebski T., Brebbia CA., 3rd International Conference on Marine Technology (ODRA 99), 1, pp. 35-43, (2000).Search in Google Scholar

14. Kniat A., Optimization Of Three-Dimensional Pipe Routing. Schiffstechnik (ShipTechnology Research), 47, pp. 111-114, (2000).Search in Google Scholar

15. Koenig N., Howard A., Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator. 2004 Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004), vol. 3, pp. 2149-2154, (2004).Search in Google Scholar

16. Li Z., Kota S., Virtual Prototyping and Motion Simulation with ADAMS. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 1(3), pp. 276-279, (2001).10.1115/1.1412231Search in Google Scholar

17. Piegl L., Tiller W., The NURBS Book. Second Edition, Springer, (1997).10.1007/978-3-642-59223-2Search in Google Scholar

18. Shreiner D., Sellers G., Kessenich J., Licea-Kane B., OpenGL Programming Guide: The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, 8th Edition, Addison-Wesley, (2013).Search in Google Scholar