[1. ANSARI, B. – MIRDAMADI, S. M. – ZAND, A. – ARFAEE, M. 2013. Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas. In Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 26–31. ISSN: 2041–0484.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. BAKOVÁ, E. 2016. LEADER 2007 – 2013 [PowerPoint slides], Lecture presented at Case study 2016 in Nitra, Slovakia on 2016 – 07 – 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. BALCERZAK, A. P., PIETRZAK, M. B. 2016. Quality of Institutions for Knowledge–based Economy within New Institutional Economics Framework. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for European Countries in the Years 2000–2013. In Economics and Sociology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 66–81. DOI: 10.14254/2071–789X.2016/9–4/4.10.14254/2071789X.2016/94/4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 808/2014 of 17 July 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).]Search in Google Scholar
[5. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – <http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:277:0001:0040:EN:PDF>]Search in Google Scholar
[6. DARGAN, L., SHUCKSMITH, M. 2008. LEADER and innovation. In Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 274–291.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2012. Synthesis of Mid–Term Evaluations of Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 – Final Report. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26] Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/evaluation/rural–development–reports/2012/synthesis–mte–2007–2013/fulltext_en.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2013. Factsheet on 2014–2020 Rural Development Programme for Slovakia. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26] Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural–development–2014–2020/country–files/sk/factsheet_en.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2014. Investment Support under Rural Development Policy – Final Report. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26] Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/evaluation/rural–development–reports/2014/investment–support–rdp/fulltext_en.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2015. Synthesis of Ex–Ante Evaluations of Rural Development Programmes 2014–2020. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26] Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/agriculturesites/agriculture/files/evaluation/rural–development–reports/2015/ex_ante_rdp_synthesis_2014_2020/fulltext_en.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. EUROPEAN UNION. 2012. The Common Agricultural Policy – A Story to be Continued. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 20 p. doi:10.2762/35894.10.2762/35894]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. FAGGIO, G., SILVA, O. 2014. Self–employment and entrepreneurship in urban and rural labour markets. In Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 84, pp. 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.09.001.10.1016/j.jue.2014.09.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. FOSS, N.J., KLEIN, P. 2012. Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139021173]Search in Google Scholar
[14. GADDEFORS, J., CRONSELL, N. 2009. Returnees and local stakeholders co–producing the entrepreneurial region. In European Planning Studies, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1191–1203.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. GLÜCKLER, J., LENZ, R. 2016. How institutions moderate the effectiveness of regional policy: A framework and research agenda. In Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, vol. 36, pp. 255–277.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. HJALAGER, A., NIELSEN, N. Ch., SIMON, C. 2013. Promoting and Empowering Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Rural Areas. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26]. Available at: <http://www.vitalruralarea.eu/scientific–articles/237–promoting–and–empowering–small–and–medium–sized–enterprises–in–rural–areas>.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. HUDSON, R. 2010. Resilient regions in an uncertain world: wishful thinking or a practical reality? In Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. INTEGRATED REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2014–2020. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26]. Available at: <http://www.mpsr.sk/index.php?navID=1127&navID2=1127&sID=67&id=9006>.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. JOHANNISSON, B. — DAHLSTRAND, A. L. 2009. Bridging the functional and territorial rationales: proposing an integrating framework for regional dynamics. In European Planning Studies, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1117–1133.10.1080/09654310902980989]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. KORSGAARD, S. — MÜLLER, S. — WITTORFF TANVIG, H. 2015. Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – between place and space. In International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–26. DOI 10.1108/IJEBR–11–2013–0205.10.1108/IJEBR1120130205]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. KUTSCHERAUER at al. 2010. Regional Disparities – Disparities in country regional development – concept, theory, identification and assessment. Ostrava: Technical University of Ostrava. 120 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. MAIA, L. 2002. Enhancing entrepreneurship in rural tourism for sustainable regional development: The Case of Soderslatt Region Sweden. The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), International Miljo Institute, Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT SR. 2016. Systém riadenia CLLD (LEADER a komunitný rozvoj) pre programové obdobie 2014–2020 v znení dodatku č.1 a č.2. [online], [cit. 2017–10–26]. Available at: <http://www.mpsr.sk/sk/index.php?navID=81&id=10475>.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. OECD. 2002. Geographic Concentrations and Territorial Disparity in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publications Service.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. OECD. 2017. Understanding the Socio–Economic Divide in Europe. Paris: OECD Publications Service.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. REGULATION (EU) No 1303/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Structural and Investment funds and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. REGULATION (EU) No 1305/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 december 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. REGULATION (EU) No 1306/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. REGULATION (EU) No 1310/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 laying down certain transitional provisions on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), amending Regulation (EU) No. 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE SR. 2007. Rural Development Programme of the Slovak Republic 2007 – 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. SOLIVA, R. 2007. Landscape stories: using ideal type narratives as a heuristic device in rural studies. In Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 62–74.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. THUESEN, A., NIELSEN, N.C. 2011. Merværdien af LEADER–metoden. Esbjerg: SDU. Center for Landdistriktsforskning.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. VORAUER, K. 1997. Europäische Regionalpolitik Regionale Disparitäten. Theoretische Fundierung, empirische Befunde und politische Entwürfe. Passau: Münchener Geographische Hefte. ISBN 3–932820–01.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. WISHLADE, F., YOUILL, D. 1997. Measuring Disparities for Area Designation Purposes: Issues for the European Union. In Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper, no. 24. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.]Search in Google Scholar