<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Association among biometric traits and characterisation based on sexed-plumage colour of Nigerian locally adapted turkey were investigated using discriminant analysis. Eight morphometric traits were measured to study their phenotypic variations between two plumage colours (Lavender and White). The characters measured were body weight (BW) as well as body dimensions such as wing length (WL), wing span (WS), body length (BL), breast girth (BG), shank length (SL), thigh length (TL) and keel length (KL) taken at 12 weeks of age. The White male turkey was significantly (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) heavier and had longer morphometric body traits than its female counterpart, but when compared with the Lavender male and female genotype, the traits did not differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> > 0.05). High positive and significant (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) correlation coefficients were recorded among the various body traits. Coefficients of correlation in Lavender turkey ranged from 0.73 – 0.94, and 0.84 – 0.96 in the White turkey. The highest association with body weight in Lavender was body length (r = 0.80, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05), and the trio of BW, TL and KL had the stronger association for the White turkey (r = 0.91, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The first, second and third canonical variable or Fisher linear discriminant function explained 52.13 %, 37.48 % and 10.39 %, respectively, of the total variation. The distances between all pair wise were significant (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The greatest distance value (415.16) was between the White male and female turkeys, closely followed by the male White and female Lavender turkey (303.58), while the least distance was between the male and female Lavender. The distance between the populations was significant. It can be concluded that thigh length, breast girth, wing length, wing span and body length can serve as the most discriminating variables in distinguishing between White and Lavender populations.</abstract>

Multifunctional discriminant analysis of morphostructural traits in Nigerian locally adapted turkeys

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The need to determine the minimum application rates of commonly used herbicides in Malete and the Guinea savanna of Nigeria for effective weed control and higher grain yield of maize, triggered this study. Therefore, field trials were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of Kwara State University, Malete, to determine the weed control method that will be more effective in controlling weeds and give higher grain yield and cash returns in the production of maize. The experiment consisted of 9 treatments viz: primextra (metolachlor plus atrazine) + 2,4-D at 1.5 + 1.5 kg active ingredient (a.i.).ha−1, primextra + 2,4-D at 2.0 + 2.0 kg a.i. ha−1, primextra + 2,4-D at 2.5 + 2.5 kg ha−1, primextra + nicosulfuron at 1.5 + 0.03 kg a.i. ha−1, primextra + nicosulfuron at 2.0 + 0.05 kg a.i. ha−1, primextra + niconsulfuron at 2.5 + 0.07 kg a.i. ha−1, primextra at 1.5 kg a.i. ha−1 + one Supplementary Hoe Weeding (SHW) at 6 Weeks After Sowing (WAS), two hand weeding at 3 and 6 Weeks After Sowing (WAS) and a weedy check. These treatments were laid out in randomised complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) package, after which means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Results showed that treatment combinations of primextra + one SHW at 6 WAS, two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS, primextra + 2,4-D at 2.0 + 2.0 kg a.i. ha−1 and primextra + nicosulfuron at 2.0+0.05 kg a.i. ha−1 gave effective weed control, higher grain yield and cash returns. Therefore, primextra at 1.5 kg a.i. ha−1 + one SHW at 6 WAS, primextra +2,4-D at 2.0 + 2.0 kg a.i. ha−1 and primextra + nicosulfuron at 2.0 + 0.05 kg a.i. ha−1 are recommended to farmers as alternative to two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS.</abstract>

Weed control and productivity of maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.) in Malete, Kwara State of Nigeria

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Weed infestation is one of the major factors attributed for the poor yield of cowpea in Nigeria and other parts of sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). Field trials were therefore conducted to evaluate the effect of row spacing and different weeding levels on weed control, growth and yield of cowpea during the early and late wet seasons of 2009. In both seasons, the use of 60 cm row spacing resulted in significant (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) reduction in weed density by 18 – 39% and weed biomass by 17 – 27% with subsequent increase in cowpea growth and grain yield than 75 and 90 cm row spacing. Cowpea grain yield increased by 67 – 109% in the early season and 24 – 56% in the late season at 60 compared to 75 and 90 cm row spacing. Hoe weeding reduced weed growth significantly in both seasons with the lowest weed density and biomass recorded in plots weeded thrice. However, this was not significantly different from weed density and biomass recorded with two weedings in both seasons. Hoe weeding twice resulted in optimum growth and grain yield of cowpea. An additional weeding, however, did not improve cowpea growth and yield in both seasons. The results of this study showed that narrow (60 cm) inter-row spacing and two hoe weedings at 3 and 6 weeks after sowing (WAS) will improve weed control and productivity of cowpea. Additional weeding is considered superfluous.</abstract>

Response of cowpea (<italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic>, L., Walp) to inter-row spacing and weed competition

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Sugarcane is an energy crop with great economic potentials. Information on soil evaluation for sugarcane in central Nigeria is very scanty. This study was carried out to evaluate the suitability of some soils of the floodplains in central Nigeria for sugarcane cultivation. A semi-detailed soil survey was carried out on 18,500 hectares of land straddling the floodplains of Rivers Niger and Benue in Korton-Karfe Local Government Area of Kogi State. Land resource survey was carried out using a 500 m×500 m grid pattern. Identified soil types were further examined with standard soil profiles. Samples were collected from the soil genetic horizons as well as surface (0–30 cm) soils at selected sampling points for fertility analysis. Parametric and non-parametric suitability evaluation methods were used to relate land qualities with land use requirements for commercial sugarcane cultivation. Relationships between evaluation methods were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Nine soil mapping units were identified in the study areas which were mainly Inceptisols (55.4%) and Alfisols (22.5%) which correlates with Fluvisols (40.4%), Cambisols (15.1%) and Lixisols (22.5%) in the World Reference Base (WRB) classification system. The evaluation methods used revealed that 0%, 4.95%, 49.48%, 23.55% of the soils were highly suitable (S1), moderately suitable (S2), marginally suitable (S3) and not suitable (N) for sugarcane cultivation, respectively. Potentially, 0%, 9.52%, 44.91% and 23.55% of the soils were found to be highly suitable (S1), moderately suitable (S2), marginally suitable (S3) and not suitable (N) for sugarcane cultivation, respectively. The soils were strongly limited by low soil nutrient availability, soil acidity and flood hazard. Soil management practices such as application of organic manures, fertiliser and liming could be adopted to ameliorate the soil acidity and supply deficient nutrients while land development strategies such as drainage, flood control and possibly sub-soiling would mitigate other major limitations to sugarcane cultivation.</abstract>

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture

Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture

Assessment of inland valley soils for sugarcane (<italic>Saccharum officinarum</italic> L.) production in some floodplains in central Nigeria

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Helping conflict-affected persons requires an understanding of conflict impacts on their livelihoods. Hence, effects of farmers-herdsmen land-use conflict on livelihoods of farming households in Benue State were investigated. Data were collected from 110 farming households in Guma and Logo Local Government Areas (LGA) using interview schedule and focus group discussion. Most (56.4%) respondents were male, aged 51.6 ± 1.6 years, cultivated 9.14 ± 5.75 acres of farm size and had been involved in farming for 27.7 ± 14.16 years. The majority (>90%) experienced high degree of exposure to conflict incidences such as destruction of properties, homelessness and poor access to market. The respondents indicated a high effect of land-use conflict on farming households’ livelihoods (81.8%) and land availability/use (>50%) following conflict regime induced by climate change. All respondents perceived the anti-open grazing prohibition law as a right step to reducing conflict occurrence. There was no significant difference in the effects of farmers-herdsmen land-use conflict on livelihood of farming households in Guma and Logo LGA (t = 0.051). Farming households were highly vulnerable to the effects of farmers-herders conflict and are supportive of the current local authority’s prohibition of open grazing. A concerted effort involving religious institutions, government and non-governmental organisations including persuasion of herders to consider other options of livestock production such as ranching or settlement scheme would add impetus to the on-going efforts to resolve the conflict.</abstract>

Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication

Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development

Climate-induced conflicts and livelihoods of farming households in Nigeria: lessons from farmers-herdsmen conflict-ridden communities in Benue State

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 57 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)

Volume 56 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 55 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 54 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

Volume 53 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 53 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 53 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 53 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 52 (2019): Issue 3-4 (December 2019)

Volume 52 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 52 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 51 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 51 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 51 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 51 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 50 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 50 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 50 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 50 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 49 (2016): Issue 1-4 (December 2016)

Volume 48 (2015): Issue 3-4 (December 2015)

Volume 48 (2015): Issue 1-2 (June 2015)

Volume 47 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 47 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 47 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 47 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 46 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 46 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 46 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 46 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

Volume 45 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 45 (2012): Issue 3 (October 2012)

Volume 45 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)

Volume 45 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)

Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica

 Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Mendel University in Brno (MENDELU) and managed by the Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies. As of 2021 it is published as Open Volume, i.e. accepted articles are immediately presented on the Sciendo platform in a continuous manner, not grouped in issues any more.   The objective of the journal is to promote the science and development of animal and plant production, animal health and welfare, issues of sustainable agriculture, agriculture technology, land and water protection, forestry in tropics and subtropics, landscape, economy of agriculture and rural development in tropical and subtropical areas, as well as studies on human resources in agriculture and protection of biodiversity. Its aim is thus to help sustainable agriculture that would provide quality food for growing human population in the areas under study.   The quality of each contribution is assessed by at least two international experts in the respective field of agricultural sciences. The members of our Editorial Board are critically evaluating the revised manuscripts before final approval is issued.   ATS welcomes original research papers, review articles, and short communications that are related to all aspects of agricultural sciences and technology from all continents and cultures. It is the most friendly publishing forum for young scientists beginning to communicate their results as well as for the seasoned ones.   Scope of the journal   Plant and animal production, animal health and welfare, issues of sustainable agriculture, agriculture technology, land and water protection, forestry in tropics and subtropics, agricultural economics, and regional development in tropical and subtropical areas.   Key words   Serious, author-friendly, helpful, accurate, responsible, reliable   Why subscribe and read   Original and review articles on all aspects and hot topics in tropical agriculture are published. The aim is to support better and sustainable use of local resources such as plants, animals, and soils for human use and support biodiversity.   Why submit   Constructive, comprehensive blind peer reviews by international experts. Editorial support to authors.   Rejection Rate    Approx. 50%      Archiving   Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.   Plagiarism Policy   The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process.   BACK ISSUES:Link to previous on-line volumes of Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica (abstracts in years 1989- 2004, full texts from 2005): www.agriculturaits.czu.cz/ and www.agricultura.mendelu.cz 

Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica

Volume 53 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Multifunctional discriminant analysis of morphostructural traits in Nigerian locally adapted turkeys

Weed control and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) in Malete, Kwara State of Nigeria

Response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, L., Walp) to inter-row spacing and weed competition

Assessment of inland valley soils for sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) production in some floodplains in central Nigeria

Climate-induced conflicts and livelihoods of farming households in Nigeria: lessons from farmers-herdsmen conflict-ridden communities in Benue State

Search

All Volumes and Issues in this Journal