[ABS-CBN News. 2016. “Rodrigo Duterte: Pagbabago or Bust.” Online: https://news.abscbn.com/focus/06/29/16/rodrigo-duterte-pagbabago-or-bust (accessed: July 10, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Amer, Ramses. 2014. “China, Vietnam, and the South China Sea: Disputes and Dispute Management.” Ocean Development and International Law, 45 (1), pp. 17–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Askandar, Kamarulzaman and Carlervin Sukim. 2016. “Making Peace over a Disputed Territory in Southeast Asia: Lessons from the Batu Puteh / Pedra Branca Case.” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 3 (1), pp. 65–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bautista, Lowell. 2016. “The Philippines and the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award: A Sombre Victory and Uncertain Times Ahead.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 38 (3), pp. 349–355.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baviera, Aileen S.P. 2014. “Domestic Interests and Foreign Policy in China and the Philippines: Implications for the South China Sea Disputes.” Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethno-graphic Viewpoints, 62 (1), pp.133–143.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baviera, Aileen S.P. 2016. “The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Security Interests and Perspectives”. In I. Storey and C.Y. Lin, eds., The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, pp.161–185.]Search in Google Scholar
[BBC. 2011. “Vietnam in Live-Fire Drill Amid South China Sea Row.” BBC, June 13, 2011; online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13745587 (accessed: July 17, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Branigan, Tania. 2011. “Vietnam Holds Live-Fire Exercises as Territorial Dispute with China Escalates.” The Guardian, June 14, 2011; online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jun/14/china-vietnam-dispute-military-exercise (accessed: July 17, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Butcher, John G. 2013. “The International Court of Justice and the Territorial Dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 35 (2), pp. 235–257.]Search in Google Scholar
[Castro, Renato Cruz De 2016. “The Duterte Administration’s Foreign Policy: Unravelling the Aquino Administration’s Balancing Agenda on an Emergent China.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35 (3), pp.139–159.10.1177/186810341603500307]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen Shaofeng. 2018. “Regional Responses to China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Contemporary China, 27 (111), pp. 344–361.]Search in Google Scholar
[CNBC. 2016. “Philippines Says Dropping South China Sea Ruling from ASEAN Statement No Win for China.” CNBC, July 26, 2016; online: https://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/26/philippines-says-dropping-south-china-sea-ruling-from-asean-statement-no-win-for-china.html (accessed: July 9, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Esmaquel II, Paterno. 2016. “Duterte: PH Won’t ‘Flaunt’ Sea Dispute Ruling vs China.” Rappler, June 30, 2016; online: https://www.rappler.com/nation/138195-duterte-flaunt-ruling-case-china-yasay-cabinet (accessed: July 9, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Garrison, Jean and Marc Wall. 2016. “The Rise of Hedging and Regionalism: An Explanation and Evaluation of President Obama’s China Policy.” Asian Affairs: An American Review, 43 (2), pp. 47–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guzman, Charles Joseph De 2014. “Philippines-China Relations, 2001-2008: Dovetailing National Interests.” Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia, 50 (1), pp. 71–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heydarian, Richard Javad. 2017. “Tragedy of Small Power Politics: Duterte and the Shifting Sands of Philippine Foreign Policy.” Asian Security, 13 (3), pp. 220–236.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heydarian, Richard Javad. 2018. “Mare Liberum: Aquino, Duterte, and The Philippines’ Evolving Lawfare Strategy in the South China Sea.” Asian Politics and Policy, 10 (2), pp. 283–299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keck, Zachary. 2014. “Vietnam Threatens Legal Action Against China.” The Diplomat, June 2, 2014; online: https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/vietnam-threatens-legal-action-against-china/ (accessed: July 23, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen, Manh Hung. 2017. “The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Award on the South China Sea Dispute between the Philippines and China: Views from America.” In J. Borton, ed., Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris US, pp. 116–128.]Search in Google Scholar
[PCA. 2015. Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. Online: https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1506 (accessed: July 3, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[PCA. 2016. Award. Online: https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086 (accessed: July 5, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Quintos, Mary Fides A. 2018. “The Philippines: Hedging in a Post-Arbitration South China Sea?” Asian Politics and Policy, 10 (2), pp. 261–282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reuters. 2016. Philippines’ Duterte Wants to ‘Open Alliances’ with Russia, China. Online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-politics-duterte-idUSKCN11W17T (accessed: July 14, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Shoji, Tomotaka. 2016. “Vietnam’s Omnidirectional Military Diplomacy: Focusing on the South China Sea.” NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, 17, pp. 41–61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shoji, Tomotaka and Hideo Tomikawa. 2017. “Southeast Asia: Duterte Takes Office, South China Sea in Flux.” In Shinji Hyodo, ed., East Asian Strategic Review 2017. Tokyo: The Japan Times, Ltd., pp. 131–155.]Search in Google Scholar
[Southgate, Laura and Nicholas Khoo. 2016. “Enter the Vanguard State: Reinterpreting ASEAN’s Response to the South China Sea Issue.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 3 (2), pp. 221–244.]Search in Google Scholar
[Storey, Ian. 2016a. “Rising Tensions in the South China Sea: Southeast Asian Responses.” In I. Storey and C.Y Lin, eds., The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute; pp. 134–160.10.1355/9789814695565-007]Search in Google Scholar
[Storey, Ian. 2016b. “Assessing Responses to the Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea.” ISEAS Perspective, 43. Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thayer, Carlyle A. 2011. “Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea and Southeast Asian Responses.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30 (2), pp. 77–104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thayer, Carlyle A. 2016. “Vietnam’s Strategy of ‘Cooperating and Struggling’ with China over Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 3 (2), pp. 200–220.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thayer, Carlyle A. 2017a. “Dead in the Water: The South China Sea Arbitral Award, One Year Later.” The Diplomat, June 28, 2017; online: https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/dead-in-the-water-the-south-china-sea-arbitral-award-one-year-later/ (accessed: August 4, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Thayer, Carlyle A. 2017b. Vietnam’s Foreign Policy in an Era of Rising Sino-US Competition and Increasing Domestic Political Influence. Asian Security, 13 (3), pp. 183–199.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Philippines Department of Foreign Affairs. 2016. “Statement of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs.” Online: https://www.dfa.gov.ph/documents-on-the-west-philippine-sea (accessed: July 6, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Tran, Truong Thuy. 2016. “Vietnam’s Relations with China and the US and the Role of ASEAN.” In Security Outlook of the Asia Pacific Countries and Its Implications for the Defense Sector. Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studies, pp. 87–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vietnam Embassy in Germany. 2014. “Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung Answers to Associated Press on 21 May.” Online: http://www.vietnambotschaft.org/prime-minister-nguyen-tan-dung-answers-to-associated-press-on-21-may/ (accessed: August 5, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vietnam MOFA. 2014. “Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Socialist Republic of Vietnam Transmitted to the Arbitral Tribunal in the Proceedings between The Republic of the Philippines and The People’s Republic of China.” Online: https://iuscogen.files.word-press.com/2018/03/statement-of-mofa-of-vietnam-to-the-tribunal.pdf (accessed: July 9, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vietnam MOFA. 2016. “Remarks of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Viet Nam on Viet Nam’s Reaction to the Issuance of the Award by the Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the Arbitration between the Philippines and China.” Online: http://www.mofa.gov.vn/en/tt_baochi/pbnfn/ns160712211059 (accessed: July 9, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vnexpress. 2017. “Đội tàu ngầm Kilo [The Kilo Submarines].” Vnexpress, August 3, 2017; online: https://vnexpress.net/interactive/2017/suc-manh-6-tau-ngam-kilo-viet-nam (accessed: August 2, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vu, Truong Minh and Thanh Trung Nguyen. 2017. “Vietnam’s Foreign Policy after the South China Sea Ruling.” Thinking ASEAN, 20, pp. 8–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yasay, Perfecto R. 2016. “Come, Let Us Reason Together: Remarks of the Hon. Perfecto R.Yasay, Jr. Secretary of Foreign Affairs at the Second Manila Conference on the South China Sea.” Online: https://www.dfa.gov.ph/speeches-and-statements/10079-come-let-us-reason-together (accessed: July 11, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zha, Daojiong and Mark J. Valencia. 2001. “Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 31 (1), pp. 86–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zha, Wen. 2015. “Personalized Foreign Policy Decision-Making and Economic Dependence: A Comparative Study of Thailand and the Philippines’ China Policies.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 37 (2), pp. 242–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Feng. 2017. “Assessing China’s Response to the South China Sea Arbitration Ruling.” Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71 (4), pp. 440–459.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zunes, Stephen. 2004. “Implications of the U.S. Reaction to the World Court Ruling against Israel’s ‘Separation Barrier.’” Middle East Policy, IX (4), pp. 72–85.]Search in Google Scholar
