[Ajdukiewicz, K. (1974). Pragmatic Logic [trans. O. Wojtasiewicz]. Dordrecht/Bos- ton/Warsaw: D. Reidel Publishing Company & PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-2109-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Bocheński, J.M. (1994). Sto zabobonow (One Hundred Superstitions). Krakow: Philed.]Search in Google Scholar
[Budzynska, K. (2013). Circularity in Ethotic Structures. Synthese 190(15), 3185-3207 (first published in 2012 under Open Access: DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0135-6).]Search in Google Scholar
[Budzynska, K., Araszkiewicz, M., Bogołębska, B., Cap, P., Ciecierski, T., Debow- ska-Kozlowska, K., Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Dziubiński, M., Federowicz, M., Go- molińska, A., Grabowski, A., Hołowka, T., Jochemczyk, Ł., Kacprzak, M., Kawalec, P., Kielar, M., Kisielewicz, A., Koszowy, M., Kublikowski, R., Kulicki, P., Kuzio, A., Lewiński, P., Lichański, J. Z., Malinowski, J., Mar- ciszewski, W., Nieznański, E., Pietrzak, J., Pogonowski, J., Puczyłow- ski, T. A., Rytel, J., Sawicka, A., Selinger, M., Skowron, A., Skulska, J., Smolak, M., Sokoł, M., Sowińska, A., Stalmaszczyk, P., Stawecki, T., Stepa- niuk, J., Strachocka, A., Suchoń,W., Szymanek, K., Tomczyk, J., Trypuz, R., Trzęsicki, K., Urbański, M., Wasilewska-Kamińska, E., Wieczorek, K. A., Witek, M., Wybraniec-Skardowska, U., Yaskorska, O., Załęska, M., Zdanow- ski, K. & Żurek, T. (2014). The Polish School of Argumentation: A Mani- festo. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argu- mentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).]Search in Google Scholar
[Budzynska, K. & Dębowska, K. (2010). Dialogues with conflict resolution: goals and effects. In: P. Łupkowski & M. Purver (Eds.), Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. SemDial 2010, 14th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 59-66), Poznań: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[Budzynska, K. & Witek, M. (2014). Non-inferential aspects of ad hominem and ad baculum. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).10.1007/s10503-014-9322-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Cap, P. (2013). Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.232]Search in Google Scholar
[Debowska-Kozlowska, K. (2014). Processing topics from the Beneficial Cognitive Model in partially and over-successful persuasion dialogues. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press). Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Strachocka, A., Szałas, A., & Verbrugge, R. (2012). A para- consistent approach to speech acts. In Proceedings of ArgMAS 2012 (9th In- ternational Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems) (pp. 59-78), Valencia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunin-Kęplicz, B. & Strachocka, A. (2013). Perceiving rules under incomplete and inconsistent information. Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, Lec- ture Notes in Computer Science, 8143, 256-272.10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Ex- tending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Phila- delphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aic.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B. & J. H. M. Wagemans (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. A comprehensive overview of the state of the art. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B. & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical dis- cussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative dis- cussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris & Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846089]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumen- tation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1993). Recon- structing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumenta- tive indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Grabowski, A. (2003). Sonderfallthese - its critique and interpretation. Rechts- theorie, 34, 371-392.]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffin, N. (2013). Commentary on M. Koszowy’s “Polish Logical Studies from an Informal Logic Perspective”. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-5), Windsor, ON: OSSA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groarke, L. (2011). Informal logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Win- ter 2003 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen. Hitchcock, D. (2006). Informal logic and the concept of argument. In: D. Jacquette (Ed.), Philosophy of Logic (pp. 101-129). Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier. http://link.springer.com/search?facet-author=%22Scott+Jacobs%22]Search in Google Scholar
[Hołowka, T. (1998). Błędy, spory, argumenty [Fallacies, disputes, arguments]. Warszawa: Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, S. (1989). Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation, 27, 345-365.10.1007/BF00182603]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacquette, D. (2006, Ed.). Philosophy of Logic. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, S. (1948). Rachunek zdań dla systemow dedukcyjnych sprzecznych, Stu- dia Societatis Scientiarun Torunesis, Section A, 1(5), 55-77. (English trans- lation: Propositional Calculus for Contradictory Deductive Systems, Studia Logica, 24 (1969), 143-157).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, S. (1949). O koniunkcji dyskusyjnej w rachunku zdań dla systemow dedukcyjnych sprzecznych”. Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunesis, Sec- tion A, 1(8): 171-2. (English translation: On the Discussive Conjunction in the Propositional Calculus for Inconsistent Deductive Systems, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7 (1999), 57-59.) 10.12775/LLP.1999.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R. H. (1987). Argumentation as dialectical. Argumentation, 1, 41-56.10.1007/BF00127118]Search in Google Scholar
[Kacprzak, M. & Yaskorska, O. (2014). Dialogue protocols for formal fallacies. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kacprzak,M., Dziubiński, M. & Budzynska, K. (in review). Strategies in Dialogues: A game-theoretic approach.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kawalec, P. (2003). Structural Reliabilism: Inductive Logic as a Theory of Justifi- cation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-0259-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kielar, M. (2011). Transitivity as a marker of valuation in journalistic discourse. In K. Debowska-Kozlowska & K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Eds.), On Words and Sounds: A Selection of Papers from the 40th PLM (pp. 311-322). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kisielewicz, A. (2011). Sztuczna inteligencja i logika [Artificial Intelligence and Logic]. Warszawa: WNT.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy, M. (2010). Pragmatic logic and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 22 (35), 29-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy, M. (2013). Polish Logical Studies from an Informal Logic Perspective. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-10), Windsor, ON: OSSA (in press). ]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy, M. & Araszkiewicz, M. (2014). Lvov-Warsaw School as a source of inspi- ration for argumentation theory. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).]Search in Google Scholar
[Malinowski, J. (2003). Pragmatic interpretation of utterances. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 11, 115-127.10.12775/LLP.2003.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Małuszyński, J. & Szałas, A. (2013). Partiality and Inconsistency in Agents’ Belief Bases. KES-AMSTA, Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 252, 3-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marciszewski, W. (1994). Sztuka rozumowania w świetle logiki [The art of dis- cussing from the perspective of logic]. Warszawa: Aleph.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moeschler, J. (2001). Speech act theory and the analysis of conversation. Sequenc- ing and interpretation in pragmatic theory. In: D. Vandervecken & S. Kubo (Eds.), Essays in Speech Act Theory (pp. 239-261), Amsterdam, John Ben- jamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nieznański, E. (2010). Sylogizm prawniczy z logicznego punktu widzenia [Legal syllogism from the point of view of logic]. Edukacja prawnicza, 3, 5-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peczenik, A. (1988). Legal reasoning as a special case of moral reasoning. Ratio Juris, 1, 123-136.10.1111/j.1467-9337.1988.tb00009.x]Search in Google Scholar
[H. Prakken (2006). Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engi- neering Review, 21, 163-188.10.1017/S0269888906000865]Search in Google Scholar
[Puczyłowski, T. (2012). O argumentacji odwołującej się do implikatury kon- wersacyjnej [On argumentation appealing to conversational implicature]. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 3(83), 93-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed, C. (2006). Representing Dialogic Argumentation. Knowledge Based Systems, 19(1), 22-31.10.1016/j.knosys.2005.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed, C.A. & Budzynska, K. (2011). How dialogues create arguments. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th conference on argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1633-1645), Amsterdam: SicSat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rees, M. A. van (2009). Dissociation in argumentative discussions. A pragma- dialectical perspective. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9150-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Rytel, J. (2012). Reaching an agreement: Argumentation in preschoolers’ narra- tive discourse. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwerstytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.]Search in Google Scholar
[Selinger, M. (2014). Towards formal representation and evaluation of arguments. In K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy (Eds.), The Polish School of Argumentation, special issue of the journal Argumentation, vol. 3 (in press).10.1007/s10503-014-9325-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, P. (2014). Linguistic Complexity and Argumentative Unity: A Lvov- Warsaw School Supplement. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(49) (this issue). 10.2478/slgr-2014-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[ Załęska, M. (2011). Ad hominem in the criticisms of expert argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th conference on argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 2047-2057), Amsterdam: SicSat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Żurek, T. & Araszkiewicz, M. (2013). Modelling teleological interpretation. In: E. Francesconi & B. Verheij (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013) (pp. 160-168), New York: ACM. ]Search in Google Scholar
