<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In this paper I will consider several interpretations of the fallacy of secundum quid as it is given by Aristotle in the Sophistical Refutations and argue that they do not work, one reason for which is that they all imply that the fallacy depends on language and thus fail to explain why Aristotle lists this fallacy among the fallacies not depending on language (extra dictione), amounting often to a claim that Aristotle miscategorises this fallacy. I will argue for a reading that preserves Aristotle’s categorization by a quite different account of how qualifications function.</p></abstract>

In this paper I will consider several interpretations of the fallacy of secundum quid as it is given by Aristotle in the Sophistical Refutations and argue that they do not work, one reason for which is that they all imply that the fallacy depends on language and thus fail to explain why Aristotle lists this fallacy among the fallacies not depending on language (extra dictione), amounting often to a claim that Aristotle miscategorises this fallacy. I will argue for a reading that preserves Aristotle’s categorization by a quite different account of how qualifications function.

Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

{"article-title":"Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid"}

In this paper I will consider several interpretations of the fallacy of secundum quid as it is given by Aristotle in the Sophistical Refutations and argue that...

Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid

Publié en ligne: 12 avr. 2014

Pages: 161 - 170

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0008

Mots clés
fallacies, language, secundum quid, hasty generalization, the principle of non-contradiction

© Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid

Publié en ligne: 12 avr. 2014

Pages: 161 - 170

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0008

Mots clésfallacies, language, secundum quid, hasty generalization, the principle of non-contradiction

© Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Mots clés
fallacies, language, secundum quid, hasty generalization, the principle of non-contradiction