<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><sec id="j_sjph-2018-0008_s_010_w2aab3b7b2b1b6b1aab1c18b1Aa"><h3>Background</h3><p>To help general practitioners (GPs) in early identification of patients with palliative care (PC) needs, this pilot study aimed to determine the potential of the combined original surprise question (SQ1) (‘Would I be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?’) and the second surprise question (SQ2) (‘Would I be surprised if this patient was still alive after 12 months?’). We hypothesized that answering these SQs would trigger them to make a multidimensional care plan.</p></sec><sec id="j_sjph-2018-0008_s_011_w2aab3b7b2b1b6b1aab1c18b2Aa"><h3>Methods</h3><p>26 Slovenian GPs, randomized into 4 groups, were invited to write a care plan for each of the four patients described in case vignettes (2 oncologic, 1 organ failure and 1 frailty case). GPs in group 1 were only asked to write a care plan for each patient. GPs in group 2 answered SQ1 and GPs in groups 3 and 4 answered SQ1 and SQ2 before writing the care plan. The type and number of PC aspects mentioned in the respective care plans were quantified into a numeric RADboud ANTicipatory (RADIANT) score.</p></sec><sec id="j_sjph-2018-0008_s_012_w2aab3b7b2b1b6b1aab1c18b3Aa"><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean RADIANT scores in groups 1-4 were 2.2, 3.6, 2.5 and 3.1, respectively. When comparing the different vignettes, vignette B (terminal oncologic patient) scored best (3.6). Mean RADIANT scores in groups 3 and 4 were slightly higher for GPs who would be surprised compared to GPs who would not be surprised if the patient was still alive in 12 months.</p></sec><sec id="j_sjph-2018-0008_s_013_w2aab3b7b2b1b6b1aab1c18b4Aa"><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The combined SQs were considered helpful in the early identification of patients in need of PC in Slovenian general practice.</p></sec></abstract>

BackgroundTo help general practitioners (GPs) in early identification of patients with palliative care (PC) needs, this pilot study aimed to determine the potential of the combined original surprise question (SQ1) (‘Would I be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?’) and the second surprise question (SQ2) (‘Would I be surprised if this patient was still alive after 12 months?’). We hypothesized that answering these SQs would trigger them to make a multidimensional care plan.Methods26 Slovenian GPs, randomized into 4 groups, were invited to write a care plan for each of the four patients described in case vignettes (2 oncologic, 1 organ failure and 1 frailty case). GPs in group 1 were only asked to write a care plan for each patient. GPs in group 2 answered SQ1 and GPs in groups 3 and 4 answered SQ1 and SQ2 before writing the care plan. The type and number of PC aspects mentioned in the respective care plans were quantified into a numeric RADboud ANTicipatory (RADIANT) score.ResultsMean RADIANT scores in groups 1-4 were 2.2, 3.6, 2.5 and 3.1, respectively. When comparing the different vignettes, vignette B (terminal oncologic patient) scored best (3.6). Mean RADIANT scores in groups 3 and 4 were slightly higher for GPs who would be surprised compared to GPs who would not be surprised if the patient was still alive in 12 months.ConclusionThe combined SQs were considered helpful in the early identification of patients in need of PC in Slovenian general practice.

Early identification of patients in need of palliative care in slovenian general practice

Slovenian Journal of Public Health

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

ZGODNJE PREPOZNAVANJE PACIENTOV S POTREBO PO PALIATIVNI OSKRBI V SPLOŠNI ZDRAVSTVENI OSKRBI V SLOVENIJI

BackgroundTo help general practitioners (GPs) in early identification of patients with palliative care (PC) needs, this pilot study aimed to determine the...

Early identification of patients in need of palliative care in slovenian general practice

Article Category: Original scientific article

Publié en ligne: 12 avr. 2018

Pages: 55 - 64

Reçu: 19 avr. 2017

Accepté: 15 janv. 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2018-0008

Mots clés
palliative care, surprise question, general practitioners, Slovenia, cancer, organ failure, frail elderly, dementia

© 2018 National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Early identification of patients in need of palliative care in slovenian general practice

Article Category: Original scientific article

Publié en ligne: 12 avr. 2018

Pages: 55 - 64

Reçu: 19 avr. 2017

Accepté: 15 janv. 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2018-0008

Mots cléspalliative care, surprise question, general practitioners, Slovenia, cancer, organ failure, frail elderly, dementia

© 2018 National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
palliative care, surprise question, general practitioners, Slovenia, cancer, organ failure, frail elderly, dementia