Reliability Based Analysis and Design of a Tripod Offshore Wind Turbine Structure Assuring Serviceability Performance

1. DNV G. ,: Support structures for wind turbines DNV GL AS, Hovik, Det Norske Veritas 2016.Search in Google Scholar

2. API RP2A-WSD. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design. American petroleum institute, Washington (DC), American 2014.Search in Google Scholar

3. Knowledge L. List of offshore wind farms. Available at: http://www.lorc.dk/offshore-wind-farms-map/list.Search in Google Scholar

4. Karimirad M. Offshore Energy Structures For Wind Power, Wave Energy and Hybrid Marine Platforms, Springer International Publishing, Cham 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. Haskell JJM, Cubrinovski M and Bradley BA. Sensitivity analysis and its role in pseudo-static design of pile foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2012, 42, pp. 80-94.10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.014Search in Google Scholar

6. Lozano-Minguez E, Kolios AJ and Brennan FP, Multicriteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures. Renewable Energy 2011, 36, pp. 2831-2837.10.1016/j.renene.2011.04.020Search in Google Scholar

7. Lee K, Effects on the various rubber fenders of a tripod offshore wind turbine substructure collision strength due to boat. Ocean Engineering 2013,72, pp. 188-194.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.014Search in Google Scholar

8. Yu H, Zeng X and Wang X, Seismic centrifuge modelling of offshore wind turbine with tripod foundation, IEEE Energytech, Energytech 2013.Search in Google Scholar

9. Yeter B, Garbatov Y and Guedes Soares C. , Evaluation of fatigue damage model predictions for fixed offshore wind turbine support structures. International Journal of Fatigue 2016, 87, pp. 71-80.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.007Search in Google Scholar

10. Cullen AC, Frey HC, and Frey CH, Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. Springer Science & Business Media 1999.Search in Google Scholar

11. Pająk M, Fuzzy modeling of cardinal features of a complex technical system in Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016 (Glasgow, Scotland, 25-29 September 2016). CRC Press, 2016, pp. 2762-2767.10.1201/9781315374987-420Search in Google Scholar

12. Borgonovo E, A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2007, 92, pp. 771-784.10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015Search in Google Scholar

13. Pająk, M. Identification of the operating parameters of a complex technical system important from the operational potential point of view. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2018, 232, pp. 62-78.10.1177/0959651817735771Search in Google Scholar

14. Andersen LV, Vahdatirad MJ, Sichani MT, et al. Natural frequencies of wind turbines on monopile foundations in clayey soils-A probabilistic approach. Computers and Geotechnics 2012, 43, pp. 1-11.10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.01.010Search in Google Scholar

15. Nour El-Din M and Kim J. Sensitivity analysis of pile-founded fixed steel jacket platforms subjected to seismic loads. Ocean Engineering 2014, 85, pp. 1-11.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.008Search in Google Scholar

16. Lee YS, Choi BL, Lee JH, et al. , Reliability-based design optimization of monopile transition piece for offshore wind turbine system. Renewable Energy 2014, 71, pp. 729-741.10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.017Search in Google Scholar

17. Yang H, Zhu Y, Lu Q, et al. , Dynamic reliability based design optimization of the tripod sub-structure of offshore wind turbines. Renewable Energy 2013, 78, pp. 16-25.10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.061Search in Google Scholar

18. Vahdatirad MJ, Bayat M, Andersen LV, et al, Probabilistic finite element stiffness of a laterally loaded monopile based on an improved asymptotic sampling method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2015, 21, pp. 503-513.10.3846/13923730.2014.890660Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhang JH, Xie YQ and Gao DW, Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Behaviors on Key Design Parameters of Tripod for Offshore Wind Farm. The Twelfth ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium. Australia 2016.Search in Google Scholar

20. Commission IE. Wind Turbines-Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines. No. IEC61400-3, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

21. Zhang L, Zhao J and Zhang JH, Analysis of Environmental Loads on Pile Foundation of Offshore Wind Turbines. International conference on marine science and technology for green shipping 2009, pp. 69-77.Search in Google Scholar

22. Pilger GG, Costa JFC and Koppe JC. Improving the efficiency of the sequential simulation algorithm using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer 2005, pp. 989-998.10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_103Search in Google Scholar

23. Hess PE, Bruchman D, Assakkaf IA, et al, Uncertainties in material and geometric strength and load variables. Naval Engineers Journal 2002, 114, pp. 139-165.10.1111/j.1559-3584.2002.tb00128.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. ASTM A. A500-93, Standard Specification for Cold-Formed Welded and Seamless Carbon Steel Structural Tubing in Rounds and Shapes, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA 2003.Search in Google Scholar

25. Code JPM, Joint committee on structural safety. 2001 URL: www. jcss. ethz. ch.Search in Google Scholar

26. Nowak AS and Collins KR. Reliability of structures: CRC Press 2012.10.1201/b12913Search in Google Scholar

27. Wang F, Chen Q and Yu GC, Research on large scale wind driven generator group tower rigidity. New Energy and Technology 2005, 20, pp. 38-39.Search in Google Scholar

28. Gulvanessian H, Calgaro J-A and Holicky M. Designer’s guide to EN 1990: eurocode: basis of structural design: Thomas Telford 2002.Search in Google Scholar

29. ISO I. 2394. General Principles on Reliability for Structures. Zurich: ISO 2015.Search in Google Scholar