Accès libre

Establishment of renal failure models by laparoscopy in bama pigs which underwent partial nephrectomy and radical contralateral nephrectomy

Hai-Feng Liu
Hai-Feng Liu
, 
Hui Li
Hui Li
, 
Ge Bai
Ge Bai
, 
Qian-Zhen Zhang
Qian-Zhen Zhang
, 
Xiang-Gao
Xiang-Gao
, 
Tao Liu
Tao Liu
 et 
Hong-Bin Wang
Hong-Bin Wang
   | 13 sept. 2019
Journal of Veterinary Research's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Publié en ligne: 13 sept. 2019
Pages: 447 - 455
Reçu: 24 déc. 2018
Accepté: 06 août 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2019-0052
Mots clés
© 2019 H.-F. Liu et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

The clamped artery was released two seconds after suturing to confirm haemostasis. The two haemostatic clips were released completely when there was no haemorrhage
The clamped artery was released two seconds after suturing to confirm haemostasis. The two haemostatic clips were released completely when there was no haemorrhage

Fig. 2

Rectal temperature in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
Rectal temperature in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 3

Heart rate in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
Heart rate in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 4

WBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
WBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 5

RBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚) group q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point ???
RBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚) group q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point ???

Fig. 6

PLT in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
PLT in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 7

CRE in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
CRE in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 8

BUN in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
BUN in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 9

Histological examination after ⅚ nephrectomy. The picture was captured in microscope vision.A – normal renal tissue, B – at 4 weeks after surgery, C – at 10 weeks after surgery. All at 400×
Histological examination after ⅚ nephrectomy. The picture was captured in microscope vision.A – normal renal tissue, B – at 4 weeks after surgery, C – at 10 weeks after surgery. All at 400×
eISSN:
2450-8608
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Virology, other, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine
RSS Feed de la revue