À propos de cet article

Citez

Chang, T. and Kott, P.S. (2008). Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonresponse Under a Plausible Model. Biometrika, 95, 557-571.10.1093/biomet/asn022Search in Google Scholar

D’Arrigo, J. and Skinner, C. (2010). Linearization Variance Estimation for Generalized Raking Estimators in the Presence of Nonresponse. Survey Methodology, 36, 181-192.Search in Google Scholar

Deville, J.-C. (2000). Generalized Calibration and Application to Weighting for Non- Response. Compstat: Proceedings in Computational Statistics; 14th Symposium Held in Utrecht, The Netherlands, J.G. Bethlehem and P.G.M. Van Der Heijden (eds). Physica Verlag: Heidelberg, 65-76.10.1007/978-3-642-57678-2_6Search in Google Scholar

Fuller, W.A. (1984). Least Squares and Related Analyses for Complex Survey Designs.Search in Google Scholar

Survey Methodology, 10, 97-118.Search in Google Scholar

Korn, E.L. and Graubard, B.I. (1993). Response to “Bias in Weighted Versus Unweighted Estimates.”. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1351.Search in Google Scholar

Kott, P.S. (2012). Why One Should Incorporate the Design Weights When Adjusting for Nonresponse Using Response Homogeneity Groups. Survey Methodology, 95-99.Search in Google Scholar

Kott, P.S. and Liao, D. (2012). Providing Double Protection for Unit Nonresponse with a Nonlinear Calibration-weighting Routine. Survey Research Methods, 6, 105-111.Search in Google Scholar

RTI International (2012). SUDAAN Language Manual, Release 11.0. Research Triangle Park. NC: RTI International.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics