Accès libre

The Romanian Prezidentialized Consultative Referendum. Eating Apples from a Poisonous Tree? Personal and Teleological Interpretations

À propos de cet article

Citez

1. CCR Decision no. 70/1999;Search in Google Scholar

2. CCR Decision no. 567/2006;Search in Google Scholar

3. CCR Decision no. 147/2007;Search in Google Scholar

4. CCR Decision no. 355/2007;Search in Google Scholar

5. CCR Decision no. 33/2009;Search in Google Scholar

6. CCR Decision no. 799/2011;Search in Google Scholar

7. CCR Decision no. 682/2012;Search in Google Scholar

8. CCR Decision no. 731/2012Search in Google Scholar

9. CCR Decision no. 334/2013;Search in Google Scholar

10. CCR Decision no.80/2014;Search in Google Scholar

11. CCR Decision/Ruling no. 2/2019;Search in Google Scholar

12. Geneza Constituției României 1991. Lucrările Adunării Constituante, Regia Autonomă “Monitorul Oficial”, 1991;Search in Google Scholar

13. https://www.presidency.ro/en/the-constitution-of-romaniaSearch in Google Scholar

14. Law no. 189/1999 - on the exercise of the legislative initiative by citizens (in Romania)Search in Google Scholar

15. Roghină R.C., The Constitutional Court of Romania against the Direction of the Constitutional Moment of 1991, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 20, Issue 34 (2017)), pp. 38-51.Search in Google Scholar

16. Roghină R.C., The survival of the Romanian Head of State Authoritarianism in Romanian Democracy through the Consultative Referendum, Romanian Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 9, Issue 1 (2018), pp. 119-152Search in Google Scholar

17. The Constitution of Romania (1991, revised in 2003)Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2392-7054
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Law, Commercial Law, other, Law of Civil Procedure, Voluntary Jurisdiction, Public Law, Criminal Law