This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Adriaanse, L., & Rensleigh, C. (2013). Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 727–744.AdriaanseL.RensleighC.2013Web of Science, Scopus and Google ScholarThe Electronic Library31672774410.1108/EL-12-2011-0174Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). Citation score normalized by cited references (Csncr): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 10(3), 875–887.BornmannL.HaunschildR.2016Citation score normalized by cited references (Csncr): The introduction of a new citation impact indicatorJournal of Informetrics10387588710.1016/j.joi.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2015). Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 408–418.BornmannL.MarxW.2015Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?Journal of Informetrics9240841810.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2016). The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the Humanities and Social Sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2778–2789.BornmannL.ThorA.MarxW.SchierH.2016The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the Humanities and Social Sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research instituteJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67112778278910.1002/asi.23627Search in Google Scholar
Cornford, T., & Smithson, S. (2005). Project research in information systems: A student’s guide. Springer.CornfordT.SmithsonS.2005Project research in information systems: A student’s guideSpringerSearch in Google Scholar
Crespo, J. A., Herranz, N., Li, Y., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014). The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the Web of Science subject category level. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1244–1256.CrespoJ. A.HerranzN.LiY.Ruiz-CastilloJ.2014The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the Web of Science subject category levelJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6561244125610.1002/asi.23006Search in Google Scholar
Fragkiadaki, E., & Evangelidis, G. (2014). Review of the indirect citations paradigm: Theory and practice of the assessment of papers, authors and journals. Scientometrics, 99(2), 261–288.FragkiadakiE.EvangelidisG.2014Review of the indirect citations paradigm: Theory and practice of the assessment of papers, authors and journalsScientometrics99226128810.1007/s11192-013-1175-5Search in Google Scholar
Fragkiadaki, E., & Evangelidis, G. (2016). Three novel indirect indicators for the assessment of papers and authors based on generations of citations. Scientometrics, 106(2), 657–694.FragkiadakiE.EvangelidisG.2016Three novel indirect indicators for the assessment of papers and authors based on generations of citationsScientometrics106265769410.1007/s11192-015-1802-4Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.GarfieldE.1979Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanitiesNew YorkWileySearch in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T. C., Ingwersen, P., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., Verleysen, F. T., & Zuccala, A. A. (2016). Taking scholarly books into account: Current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2), 685–699.Giménez-ToledoE.Mañana-RodríguezJ.EngelsT. C.IngwersenP.PölönenJ.SivertsenG.VerleysenF. T.ZuccalaA. A.2016Taking scholarly books into account: Current developments in five European countriesScientometrics107268569910.1007/s11192-016-1886-5Search in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Chi, P. S. (2016). The challenges to expand bibliometric studies from periodical literature to monographic literature with a new data source: The book citation index. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2165–2179.GlänzelW.ThijsB.ChiP. S.2016The challenges to expand bibliometric studies from periodical literature to monographic literature with a new data source: The book citation indexScientometrics10932165217910.1007/s11192-016-2046-7Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W. 2007. Publish or Perish. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htmlHarzingA. W.2007Publish or PerishRetrieved fromhttp://www.harzing.com/pop.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804.HarzingA. W.AlakangasS.2016Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparisonScientometrics106278780410.1007/s11192-015-1798-9Search in Google Scholar
Heckscher, C. C., Maccoby, M., Ramirez, R., & Tixier, P. E. (2003). Agents of change: Crossing the post-industrial divide. Wiley Online Library.HeckscherC. C.MaccobyM.RamirezR.TixierP. E.2003Agents of change: Crossing the post-industrial divideWiley Online Library10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261758.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Klosik , D. F., & Bornholdt, S. (2014). The citation wake of publications detects nobel laureates’ papers. PloS one, 9(12), e113184.KlosikD. F.BornholdtS.2014The citation wake of publications detects nobel laureates’ papersPloS one912e11318410.1371/journal.pone.0113184424983925437855Search in Google Scholar
Kousha , K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164.KoushaK.ThelwallM.RezaieS.2011Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and ScopusJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology62112147216410.1002/asi.21608Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Opthof, T., & Mutz, R. (2011). Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documents. arXiv.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.OpthofT.MutzR.2011Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documentsSearch in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Felt, U. (2012). “Books” and “Book Chapters” in the Book Citation Index (Bkci) and Science Citation Index (Sci, Sosci, A & Hci). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–7.LeydesdorffL.FeltU.2012“Books” and “Book Chapters” in the Book Citation Index (Bkci) and Science Citation Index (Sci, Sosci, A & Hci)Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology4911710.1002/meet.14504901027Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Scopus’s source normalized impact per paper (Snip) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2365–2369.LeydesdorffL.OpthofT.2010Scopus’s source normalized impact per paper (Snip) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61112365236910.1002/asi.21371Search in Google Scholar
Meho, L., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.MehoL.YangK.2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of Science, Scopus and Google ScholarJournal American Society for Information Science and Technology58132105212510.1002/asi.20677Search in Google Scholar
Mingers, J. 2008. Exploring the dynamics of journal citations: Modelling with S-Curves. Journal Operational Research Society, 59(8), 1013–1025.MingersJ.2008Exploring the dynamics of journal citations: Modelling with S-CurvesJournal Operational Research Society5981013102510.1057/palgrave.jors.2602428Search in Google Scholar
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015a). Identifying research fields within business and management: A journal cross-citation analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(8), 1370– 1384.MingersJ.LeydesdorffL.2015aIdentifying research fields within business and management: A journal cross-citation analysisJournal of the Operational Research Society6681370– 138410.1057/jors.2014.113Search in Google Scholar
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015b). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1–19.MingersJ.LeydesdorffL.2015bA review of theory and practice in scientometricsEuropean Journal of Operational Research246111910.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar
Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. (2010). Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of management. Scientometrics, 85(2), 613–625.MingersJ.LipitakisE.2010Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of managementScientometrics85261362510.1007/s11192-010-0270-0Search in Google Scholar
Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. (2013). Evaluating a department’s research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and management. Information Processing & Management, 49(3), 587–595.MingersJ.LipitakisE.2013Evaluating a department’s research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and managementInformation Processing & Management49358759510.1016/j.ipm.2012.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Mingers, J., & Meyer, M. (2017). Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1111–1121.MingersJ.MeyerM.2017Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluationScientometrics11221111112110.1007/s11192-017-2415-x550206428781396Search in Google Scholar
Moed, H. (2010a). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265–277.MoedH.2010aMeasuring contextual citation impact of scientific journalsJournal of Informetrics4326527710.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Moed, H. (2010b). The source-normalized impact per paper (Snip) is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 211–213.MoedH.2010bThe source-normalized impact per paper (Snip) is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impactJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62121121310.1002/asi.21424Search in Google Scholar
Morgan , G. (1986). Images of Organisation. Newbury Park: Sage.MorganG.1986Images of OrganisationNewbury ParkSageSearch in Google Scholar
Opthof, T., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 423–430.OpthofT.LeydesdorffL.2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performanceJournal of Informetrics4342343010.1016/j.joi.2010.02.003Search in Google Scholar
Prins, A. A. M., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270.PrinsA. A. M.CostasR.van LeeuwenT. N.WoutersP. F.2016Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science dataResearch Evaluation25326427010.1093/reseval/rvv049Search in Google Scholar
Torres -Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2014). Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2113–2127.Torres-SalinasD.Robinson-GarcíaN.Cabezas-ClavijoÁ.Jiménez-ContrerasE.2014Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation indexScientometrics9832113212710.1007/s11192-013-1168-4Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. (2013). A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 833–849.WaltmanL.van EckN.2013A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicatorsJournal of Informetrics7483384910.1016/j.joi.2013.08.002Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N., van Leeuwen, T., & Visser, M. (2013). Some modifications to the Snip journal impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 272–285.WaltmanL.van EckN.van LeeuwenT.VisserM.2013Some modifications to the Snip journal impact indicatorJournal of Informetrics7227228510.1016/j.joi.2012.11.011Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N., van Leeuwen, T., Visser, M., & van Raan, A. (2010). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 37–47.WaltmanL.van EckN.van LeeuwenT.VisserM.van RaanA.2010Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerationsJournal of Informetrics51374710.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N., van Leeuwen, T., Visser, M., & van Raan, A. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 87(3), 467–481.WaltmanL.van EckN.van LeeuwenT.VisserM.van RaanA.2011Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysisScientometrics87346748110.1007/s11192-011-0354-5308105521654898Search in Google Scholar
Williams, G., Basso, A., Galleron, I., & Lippiello, T. (2018). More, less or better: The problem of evaluating books in SSH research. The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, A. Bonaccorsi (ed.). Springer, 133–158.WilliamsG.BassoA.GalleronI.LippielloT.2018More, less or better: The problem of evaluating books in SSH research. The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and HumanitiesBonaccorsiA.Springer133–15810.1007/978-3-319-68554-0_6Search in Google Scholar
Zitt, M. (2010). Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the audience factor. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 392–406.ZittM.2010Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the audience factorJournal of Informetrics4339240610.1016/j.joi.2010.03.004Search in Google Scholar
Zitt, M. (2011). Behind citing-side normalization of citations: Some properties of the journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 89(1), 329–344.ZittM.2011Behind citing-side normalization of citations: Some properties of the journal impact factorScientometrics89132934410.1007/s11192-011-0441-7Search in Google Scholar
Zuccala, A., Breum, M., Bruun, K., & Wunsch, B. T. (2018). Metric assessments of books as families of works. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1), 146–157.ZuccalaA.BreumM.BruunK.WunschB. T.2018Metric assessments of books as families of worksJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology69114615710.1002/asi.23921Search in Google Scholar
Zuccala, A., & Cornacchia, R. (2016). Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographs. Scientometrics, 108(1), 465–484.ZuccalaA.CornacchiaR.2016Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographsScientometrics108146548410.1007/s11192-016-1911-8Search in Google Scholar
