This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Adam, A. (2000). Gender and computer ethics. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 30(4), 17–24.10.1145/572260.572265AdamA.2000Gender and computer ethicsACM SIGCAS Computers and Society3041724Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ale, F.L. (2015). What is market segmentation? (Merca 2.0) Retrieved from http://www.merca20.com/que-es-la-segmentacion-de-mercados/.AleF.L.2015What is market segmentation?(Merca 2.0)Retrieved fromhttp://www.merca20.com/que-es-la-segmentacion-de-mercados/Search in Google Scholar
Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A.R. (2006). Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 23(3), 321–346.ArgamonS.KoppelM.FineJ.ShimoniA.R.2006Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written textsText-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse23332134610.1515/text.2003.014Search in Google Scholar
Burger, J.D., Henderson, J., Kim, G., & Zarrella, G. (2011). Discriminating gender on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1301–1309). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.BurgerJ.D.HendersonJ.KimG.ZarrellaG.2011Discriminating gender on TwitterIn Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing13011309Stroudsburg, PAAssociation for Computational LinguisticsSearch in Google Scholar
Campbell, M. (2016). About our site. (Behind the Name: the Etymology and History of First Names). Retrieved from http://www.behindthename.com.CampbellM.2016About our site(Behind the Name: the Etymology and History of First Names)Retrieved fromhttp://www.behindthename.comSearch in Google Scholar
Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., & Jajodia, S. (2010). Who is tweeting on Twitter: Human, bot, or cyborg? In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 21–30). New York: ACM.ChuZ.GianvecchioS.WangH.JajodiaS.2010Who is tweeting on Twitter: Human, bot, or cyborg?In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference2130New YorkACM10.1145/1920261.1920265Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.CohenJ.1988Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences2ndHillsdale, NJLawrence Earlbaum AssociatesSearch in Google Scholar
Entrepreneur Magazine. (2012). How to know your market. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/264931.Entrepreneur Magazine2012How to know your marketRetrieved fromhttps://www.entrepreneur.com/article/264931Search in Google Scholar
Fernandez, D., Moctezuma, D., & Sordia, O. (2016). Features combination for gender recognition on Twitter Users. IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing, 17(17), 400–408.FernandezD.MoctezumaD.SordiaO.2016Features combination for gender recognition on Twitter UsersIEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing171740040810.1109/ROPEC.2016.7830623Search in Google Scholar
Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A.C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128.10.1037/a002253021381851GaucherD.FriesenJ.KayA.C.2011Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequalityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology101110912821381851Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. (2015). New Twitter tool promising better targeting. (Merka 2.0). Retrieved from http://www.merca20.com/nueva-herramienta-de-twitter-que-promete-una-mejor-segmentacion-del-target/.GonzalezF.2015New Twitter tool promising better targetingMerka 2.0. Retrieved fromhttp://www.merca20.com/nueva-herramienta-de-twitter-que-promete-una-mejor-segmentacion-del-target/Search in Google Scholar
Greenfield, C. (2012). Don’t be creepy: Using robust user data for ad targeting while respecting privacy. (Target Marketing). Retrieved from http://www.targetmarketingmag.com/post/don-t-creeper-utilizing-robust-user-data-ad-targeting-while-respecting-privacy/all/.GreenfieldC.2012Don’t be creepy: Using robust user data for ad targeting while respecting privacy(Target Marketing)Retrieved fromhttp://www.targetmarketingmag.com/post/don-t-creeper-utilizing-robust-user-data-ad-targeting-while-respecting-privacy/all/Search in Google Scholar
Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (pp. 71–80). Alexandria: ACM.GrossR.AcquistiA.2005Information revelation and privacy in online social networksIn Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society7180AlexandriaACM10.1145/1102199.1102214Search in Google Scholar
Herdağdelen, A. (2013). Twitter n-gram corpus with demographic metadata. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(4), 1127–1147.10.1007/s10579-013-9227-2HerdağdelenA.2013Twitter n-gram corpus with demographic metadataLanguage Resources and Evaluation47411271147Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Howland, S. (2014). Anticipate trends ensure business success. (Chiefexecutive.net) Retrieved from http://chiefexecutive.net/anticipate-trends-ensure-business-success/3/.HowlandS.2014Anticipate trends ensure business success(Chiefexecutive.net)Retrieved fromhttp://chiefexecutive.net/anticipate-trends-ensure-business-success/3/Search in Google Scholar
Irani, D., Webb, S., Li, K., & Pu, C. (2009). Large Online Social Footprints–An Emerging Threat. In CSE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (pp. 271–276). Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.IraniD.WebbS.LiK.PuC.2009Large Online Social Footprints–An Emerging ThreatIn CSE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering271276Washington, D.C.IEEE Computer Society10.1109/CSE.2009.459Search in Google Scholar
Katell, M.A., Mishra, S.R., & Scaff, L. (2016). A fair exchange: Exploring how online privacy is valued. In the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2016) (pp: 1881–1890). Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.KatellM.A.MishraS.R.ScaffL.2016A fair exchange: Exploring how online privacy is valuedIn the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2016)18811890Washington, D.C.IEEE Computer Society10.1109/HICSS.2016.239Search in Google Scholar
Khazaei, T., Xiao, L., Mercer, R.E., & Khan, A. (2016a). Privacy Preference Inference via Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 611–614.KhazaeiT.XiaoL.MercerR.E.KhanA.2016aPrivacy Preference Inference via Collaborative FilteringIn Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM)611614Search in Google Scholar
Khazaei, T., Xiao, L., Mercer, R.E., & Khan, A. (2016b). Privacy behaviour and profile configuration in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 575–580). Montreal.KhazaeiT.XiaoL.MercerR.E.KhanA.2016bPrivacy behaviour and profile configuration in TwitterIn Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web575580Montreal10.1145/2872518.2890088Search in Google Scholar
Krempeaux, C.I. (2013). Predicting gender on Twitter. (Charles Iliya Krempeaux Personal Site) Retrieved from http://changelog.ca/log/2013/03/03/twitter_gender.KrempeauxC.I.2013Predicting gender on Twitter(Charles Iliya Krempeaux Personal Site)Retrieved fromhttp://changelog.ca/log/2013/03/03/twitter_genderSearch in Google Scholar
Kwasny, M., Caine, K., Rogers, W.A., & Fisk, A.D. (2008). Privacy and technology: Folk definitions and perspectives. In CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3291–3296). New York: ACM.KwasnyM.CaineK.RogersW.A.FiskA.D.2008Privacy and technology: Folk definitions and perspectivesIn CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems32913296New YorkACM10.1145/1358628.1358846564787729057397Search in Google Scholar
Liu, W., & Ruths, D. (2013). What’s in a name? Using first names as features for gender inference in Twitter. In Analyzing Microtext: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium (pp. 10–16). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.LiuW.RuthsD.2013What’s in a name? Using first names as features for gender inference in TwitterIn Analyzing Microtext: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium1016Palo Alto, CAAAAI PressSearch in Google Scholar
Lopez, N. (2014). Twitter advertisers can now target ads based on the apps a user has installed. (The next web). Retrieved from http://thenextweb.com/insider/2014/12/09/twitter-advertisers-can-now-monitor-user-behavior-mobile-apps-ad-targeting/.LopezN.2014Twitter advertisers can now target ads based on the apps a user has installed(The next web)Retrieved fromhttp://thenextweb.com/insider/2014/12/09/twitter-advertisers-can-now-monitor-user-behavior-mobile-apps-ad-targeting/Search in Google Scholar
Morey, T., Forbath, T., & Schoop, A. (2015). Customer data: Designing for transparency and trust. (Harvard Business Review). Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/05/customer-data-designing-for-transparency-and-trust.MoreyT.ForbathT.SchoopA.2015Customer data: Designing for transparency and trust(Harvard Business Review)Retrieved fromhttps://hbr.org/2015/05/customer-data-designing-for-transparency-and-trustSearch in Google Scholar
Nazir, S., Tayyab, A., Sajid, A., Rashid, H.u., & Javed, I. (2012). How online shopping is affecting consumers buying behavior in Pakistan? IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 9(3), 486–495.NazirS.TayyabA.SajidA.RashidH.u.JavedI.2012How online shopping is affecting consumers buying behavior in Pakistan?IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues93486495Search in Google Scholar
Parker, R.B. (1974). A definition of privacy. Rutgers Law Review, 27(1), 275–296.ParkerR.B.1974A definition of privacyRutgers Law Review27127529610.4324/9781315246024-5Search in Google Scholar
Riquelme, I.P., & Román, S. (2014). Is the influence of privacy and security on online trust the same for all type of consumers? Electronic Markets, 24(2), 135–149.10.1007/s12525-013-0145-3RiquelmeI.P.RománS.2014Is the influence of privacy and security on online trust the same for all type of consumers?Electronic Markets242135149Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sieger, H., & Moller, S. (2012). Gender differences in the perception of security of mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Companion (pp. 107–112). New York: ACM.SiegerH.MollerS.2012Gender differences in the perception of security of mobile phonesIn Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Companion107112New YorkACMSearch in Google Scholar
Statista. (2016). Global social networks ranked by number of users. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.Statista2016Global social networks ranked by number of usersRetrieved fromhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/Search in Google Scholar
Twitter. (2017). Users. Retrieved from https://dev.twitter.com/overview/api/users.Twitter2017UsersRetrieved fromhttps://dev.twitter.com/overview/api/usersSearch in Google Scholar
van Aswegen, A. (2015). Women vs. men—Gender differences in purchase decision making (Guided Selling) Retrieved from http://www.guided-selling.org/women-vs-men-gender-differences-in-purchase-decision-making/.van AswegenA.2015Women vs. men—Gender differences in purchase decision making(Guided Selling)Retrieved fromhttp://www.guided-selling.org/women-vs-men-gender-differences-in-purchase-decision-making/Search in Google Scholar
Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. (2014). A topology of Twitter research: Disciplines, methods, and ethics. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 250–261.10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0083ZimmerM.ProferesN.2014A topology of Twitter research: Disciplines, methods, and ethicsAslib Journal of Information Management663250261Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
