<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Over the past decades, the comparative method has attracted the attention of the theorists, and studies based on this approach have increased in applied policy research. In their daily and strategically policy decisions, the decision makers from local, regional and national levels use more and more the comparative research methods, especially due to interlinked relationship and the need for bench learning and benchmarking practices. The comparative method allows the actors to analyse other experiences, and thus to take decisions more efficient. This is a normal, an inevitable situation, when the unit of analysis is a country, a field of matters or a process where researchers compare cases from empirical or theoretical point of view. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical view on the capacity of comparative method to foster knowledge in policy studies. The intention is to see and to explore the utility of comparative method for policy studies and policy analysis, since a new approach “evidence-based policymaking” arise, emphasising the importance of using evidence from other political and policy systems.</p></abstract>

Over the past decades, the comparative method has attracted the attention of the theorists, and studies based on this approach have increased in applied policy research. In their daily and strategically policy decisions, the decision makers from local, regional and national levels use more and more the comparative research methods, especially due to interlinked relationship and the need for bench learning and benchmarking practices. The comparative method allows the actors to analyse other experiences, and thus to take decisions more efficient. This is a normal, an inevitable situation, when the unit of analysis is a country, a field of matters or a process where researchers compare cases from empirical or theoretical point of view. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical view on the capacity of comparative method to foster knowledge in policy studies. The intention is to see and to explore the utility of comparative method for policy studies and policy analysis, since a new approach “evidence-based policymaking” arise, emphasising the importance of using evidence from other political and policy systems.

The comparative method for policy studies: the thorny aspects

National University of Political Studies and Public Administration

HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"The comparative method for policy studies: the thorny aspects"}

Over the past decades, the comparative method has attracted the attention of the theorists, and studies based on this approach have increased in applied policy...

The comparative method for policy studies: the thorny aspects

Publié en ligne: 28 mars 2019

Pages: 56 - 67

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2019-0005

Mots clés
comparative method, policy research, methodology in administrative science, policy system

© 2019 Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru (Cruceanu), published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The comparative method for policy studies: the thorny aspects

Publié en ligne: 28 mars 2019

Pages: 56 - 67

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2019-0005

Mots cléscomparative method, policy research, methodology in administrative science, policy system

© 2019 Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru (Cruceanu), published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
comparative method, policy research, methodology in administrative science, policy system