[Aczel, A.D. (2000). Statystyka w zarządzaniu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brans, J.P. (1982). L’ingénierie de la décision: élaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. Laval: Presses de l’Université Laval.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, M.F. & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Combining gray relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 1473–1490. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006.10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, S.J. & Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffiths, D. (2012). Head First. Statystyka. Gliwice: Helion.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hwang, C.L. & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh, L.F. & Izadikhah, M. (2006). An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175, 1375–1384. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.08.048.10.1016/j.amc.2005.08.048]Search in Google Scholar
[Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh, L.F. & Izadikhah, M. (2006). Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181, 1544–1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057.10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057]Search in Google Scholar
[Janic, M. (2003). Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev, and air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26 (6), 491–512. DOI: 10.1080/0308106032000167373.10.1080/0308106032000167373]Search in Google Scholar
[Kukuła, K. (2000). Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwong, C.K. & Tam, S.M. (2002). Case-based reasoning approach to concurrent design of low power transformers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 128, 136–141. DOI:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00440-5.10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00440-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y. & Hwang C.L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, 76, 486–500. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8.10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Łatuszyńska, A. (2012). Key Indicators in Evaluation of the Level of Information Society Development. Studies & Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management, 60, 108–121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milani, A.S., Shanian, A. & Madoliat, R. (2005). The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: A case study in gear material selection. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29, 312–318. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1.10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak, E. (1990). Metody taksonomiczne w klasyfikacji obiektów społeczno-gospodarczych. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olson, D. L. (2004). Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40 (7–8), 721–727. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003.10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering.]Search in Google Scholar
[Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445–455. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). La Revue d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO), 8, 57–75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shih, H.S., Shyur, H.J. & Lee E.S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45 (7–8), 801–813. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm. 2006.03.023.]Search in Google Scholar
[Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y.D.P. & Faria, A.S. (2004). An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18, 35–54. DOI: 10.1023/B: WARM.0000015348.88832.52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tikhonenko, A. (2011). Przedziałowe rozszerzenie metody TOPSIS, XII Studencka Konferencja Informatyczna, 15 June 2011. Częstochowa: Politechnika Częstochowska.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsaur, S.H., Chang, T.Y. & Yen C.H. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23, 107–115. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4.10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, T. & Chou, P. (2005). Solving a multiresponse simulation–optimization problem with discrete variables using a multi-attribute decision-making method. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 68, 9–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.004.10.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoon, K. & Hwang C.L. (1985). Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part I—single-plant strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 23, 345–359. DOI: 10.1080/00207548508904712.10.1080/00207548508904712]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeliaś, A. (2000). Metody statystyczne. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.]Search in Google Scholar