[Adler, P.B., Hillerislambers, J., Levine J.M., 2007. A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters, 10: 95–104.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00996.x17257097]Search in Google Scholar
[Amarasekare, P., 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecology Letters, 6: 1109–1122.10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J.M., 1975. The enigma of soil animal species diversity. In Vanek, J. (eds). Progress in soil zoology. Prague: Czech, Academy of Sciences, p. 51-57.10.1007/978-94-010-1933-0_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, M.J., 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β-diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters, 14: 19–28.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x21070562]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldeck, C.A., Harms, K.E., Yavitt, J.B., John, R., Turner, B.L., Valencia, R., Navarrete, H., Davies, S.J., Chuyong, G.B., Kenfack, D., Thomas, D.W., Madawala, S., Gunatilleke, N., Gunatilleke, S., Bunyavejchewin, S., Kiratiprayoon, S., Yaacob, A., Supardi, M.N., Dalling, J.W., 2013. Soil resources and topography shape local tree community structure in tropical forests. In Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280 (1753): 2012–2032.10.1098/rspb.2012.2532357434823256196]Search in Google Scholar
[Barot, S., Gignoux, J., 2004. Mechanisms promoting plant coexistence: can all the proposed processes be reconciled? Oikos, 106: 185–192.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13038.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Belgard, A.L., 1950. Lesnaya rastitel’nost’ yugo-vostoka USSR [Forest vegetation of the south-eastern part of Ukraine]. Kyiv: KGU im. Shevchenko Press. 263 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belgard, A.L., 1971. Stepnoe lesovedenie [Steppe forestry]. Moskva: Lesnaya promyshlennosť. 336 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belyea, L.R., Lancaster, J., 1999. Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos, 86 (3): 402–416.10.2307/3546646]Search in Google Scholar
[Berg, M.P., 2012. Patterns of biodiversity at fine and small spatial scales. In Wall, D.H., Bardgett, R.D., Behan-Pelletier, V., Herrick, J.E., Jones, T.H., Ritz, K., Six, J., Strong, D.R., van der Putten, W.H. (eds). Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, p. 136–152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berg, M.P., Bengtsson, J., 2007. Temporal and spatial variability in soil food web structure. Oikos, 116: 1789–1804.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15748.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Blanchet, F.G., Bergeron, J.A.C., Spence, J.R., He, F., 2013. Landscape effects of disturbance, habitat heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation for a ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblage in mature boreal forest. Ecography, 36: 636–647.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07762.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Blanchet, F.G., Legendre, P., Borcard, D., 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology, 89 (9): 2623–2632.10.1890/07-0986.118831183]Search in Google Scholar
[Borcard, D., Legendre, P., 1994. Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: An example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei). Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1: 37–61.10.1007/BF00714196]Search in Google Scholar
[Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Avois-Jacquet, C., Tuosimoto, H., 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology, 85: 1826–1832.10.1890/03-3111]Search in Google Scholar
[Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Drapeau, P., 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology, 73: 1045–1055.10.2307/1940179]Search in Google Scholar
[Brygadyrenko, V.V., 2015. Evaluation of the ecological niche of some abundant species of the subfamily Platyninae (Coleoptera, Carabidae) against the background of eight ecological factors. Folia Oecologica, 42: 75–88]Search in Google Scholar
[Brygadyrenko, V.V., 2016. Effect of canopy density on litter invertebrate community structure in pine forests. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35 (1): 90–102.10.1515/eko-2016-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Buzuk, G.N., 2017. Fitoindikaciya s primeneniem ekologicheskikh shkal i regressionnogo analiza: ekolo-gicheskiĭ indeks [Phytoindication with ecological scales and regression analysis: environmental index]. Vestnik Farmacii, 2 (76): 31–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cadotte, M.W., Fukami, T., 2005. Dispersal, spatial scale and species diversity in a hierarchically structured experimental landscape. Ecology Letters, 8: 548–557.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00750.x21352459]Search in Google Scholar
[Caruso, T., Taormina, M., Migliorini, M., 2012. Relative role of deterministic and stochastic determinants of soil animal community: a spatially explicit analysis of oribatid mites. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81(1): 214–221.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01886.x21722106]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, L., Zeleny, D., Li, C., Chiu, S., Hsieh, C., 2013. Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche- and dispersal-based processes in community assembly. Ecology, 94: 2145–2151.10.1890/12-2053.124358699]Search in Google Scholar
[Chase, J.M., 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia, 136: 489–498.10.1007/s00442-003-1311-712836009]Search in Google Scholar
[Chave, J., 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7: 241–253.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2003.00566.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, J.S., 2012. The coherence problem with the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27: 199–203.10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.00122401902]Search in Google Scholar
[Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J.J., Rossi, J.-P., 2009. A null-model analysis of the spatio-temporal distribution of earthworm species assemblages in Colombian grasslands. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25 (4): 415–427.10.1017/S0266467409006075]Search in Google Scholar
[Decaëns, T., Rossi, J.-P., 2001. Spatio-temporal structure of earthworm community and soil heterogeneity in a tropical pasture. Ecography, 24 (6): 671–682.10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240606.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Diduh, Y.P., 2012. Prinzypy bioindicatzii [The principles of bioindication]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. 344 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Didukh, Y.P., Fitsailo, T.V., Korotchenko, I.A., Yakushenko, D.M., Pashkevych, N.A., 2011. Biotopi lisovoi ta lisostepovoi zon Ukriiny [Biotopes of forest and forest-steppe zones of Ukraine]. Kyiv: LLC MACROS. 288 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Didukh, Y.P., 2011. The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre. 176 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Digel, C., Curtsdotter, A., Riede, J., Klarner, B., Brose, U., 2014. Unravelling the complex structure of forest soil food webs: higher omnivory and more trophic levels. Oikos, 123: 1157–1172.10.1111/oik.00865]Search in Google Scholar
[Dinno, A., 2012. paran: Horn’s test of principal components/factors. R package version 1.5.1. [cit. 2017-11-03]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=paran]Search in Google Scholar
[Dornelas, M., 2010. Disturbance and change in biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 3719–3727.10.1098/rstb.2010.0295]Search in Google Scholar
[Dornelas, M., Connolly S.R., Hughes T.P., 2006. Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 440: 80–82.10.1038/nature04534]Search in Google Scholar
[Drake, J.A., 1990. Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5: 159–164.10.1016/0169-5347(90)90223-Z]Search in Google Scholar
[Dray, S., Legendre, P., Peres-Neto, P., 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecological Modelling, 196: 483–493.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Dray, S. with contributions of Legendre, P., Blanchet, G., 2016. packfor: forward selection with permutation (Canoco p. 46). R package version 0.0-8/r136. [cit. 2017-11-03]. https://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/sedar/]Search in Google Scholar
[Dvořáková, J., Horsák, M., 2012. Variation of snail assemblages in hay meadows: disentangling predictive power of abiotic environment and vegetation. Malacologia, 55: 151–162.10.4002/040.055.0110]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellenberg, H., 1974. Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta geobotanica, 9. Göttingen: Göltze. 197 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ettema, C.H., Rathbun, S.L., Coleman, D.C., 2000. On spatiotemporal patchiness and the coexistence of five species of Chronogaster (Nematoda: Chronogasteridae) in a riparian wetland. Oecologia, 125: 444–452.10.1007/s004420000468]Search in Google Scholar
[Ettema, C., Wardle, D.A., 2002. Spatial soil ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17: 177–183.10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02496-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Ettema, C.H., Yeates, G.W., 2003. Nested spatial biodiversity patterns of nematode genera in a New Zealand forest and pasture soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35 (2): 339–342.10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00276-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Fukami, T., 2010. Community assembly dynamics in space. In Verhoef, H.A., Morin, P.J. (eds). Community ecology: processes, models, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 45–54.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228973.003.0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Gazol, A., Ibanez, R., 2010. Plant species composition in a temperate forest: multi-scale patterns and determinants. Oecologia, 36: 634–644.10.1016/j.actao.2010.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Gholami, S., Sayad, E., Gebbers, R., Schirrmann, M., Joschko, M., Timmer, J., 2016. Spatial analysis of riparian forest soil macrofauna and its relation to abiotic soil properties. Pedobiologia, 59 (1): 27–36.10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilyarov, M.S., Folkmanova, B., 1957. Gubonogie mnogonozhki (Chilopoda) stepnoĭ zony jugo-vostoka Evrope-jskoĭ chasti SSSR kak pokazateli pochvennykh usloviĭ v lesonasazhdeniyakh [Centipedes (Chilopoda) of the steppe zone in the southeast of the European part of the USSR as indicators of soil conditions in forest stands]. Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya, 2: 211–219.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, J.L., 1965. A rationale and a test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30: 179–185.10.1007/BF0228944714306381]Search in Google Scholar
[Horsák, M., Hájek, M., Tichý, L., Juřičková, L., 2007. Plant indicator values as a tool for land mollusc autecology assessment. Acta Oecologica, 32: 161–171.10.1016/j.actao.2007.03.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, Y.-H., D.-Y. Sheng, Y.-Z. Xiang, Z.-J. Yang, D.-P. Xu, N.-N. Zhang, Shi, L.-L., 2013. The environment, not space, dominantly structures the landscape patterns of the richness and composition of the tropical understory vegetation. PLoS ONE, 8:e81308.10.1371/journal.pone.0081308383836624278417]Search in Google Scholar
[Hubbell, S.P., 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. 392 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutchinson, G.E., 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22: 415–427.10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutchinson, G.E., 1965. The niche: an abstractly inhabited hypervolume. In Hutchinson, G.E. (eds). The ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 26–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Igondová, E., Majzlan, O., 2015. Assemblages of ground beetles (Carabidae, Coleoptera) in peatland habitat, surrounding dry pine forests and meadows. Folia Oecologica, 42: 21–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiménez, J.J., Decaëns, T., Rossi, J.P., 2006. Stability of the spatio-temporal distribution and niche overlap in neotropical earthworm assemblages. Acta Oecologica, 30 (3): 299–311.10.1016/j.actao.2006.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiménez, J.J., Decaëns, T., Rossi, J.-P., 2012. Soil environmental heterogeneity allows spatial co-occurrence of competitor earthworm species in a gallery forest of the Colombian ‘Llanos’. Oikos, 121: 915–926.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20428.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiménez, J. J., Decaëns, T., Lavelle, P., Rossi, J.-P., 2014. Dissecting the multi-scale spatial relationship of earthworm assemblages with soil environmental variability. BMC Ecology, 14:26.10.1186/s12898-014-0026-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Jorgensen, H.B., Elmholt, S., Petersen, H., 2003. Collembolan dietary specialisation on soil grown fungi. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 39: 9–15.10.1007/s00374-003-0674-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Karpachevsky, L.O., 2005. Ekologicheskoe pochvovedenie [Ecological pedology]. Moscow: Geos. 336 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirby, K.N., Gerlanc, D., 2013. BootES: an R package for bootstrap confidence intervals on effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45: 905–927.10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Krivolutsky, D.A., 1994. Pochvennaya fauna v ekologicheskom kontrole [Soil fauna in ecological control]. Moskva: Nauka. 240 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laliberte, E., Paquette, A., Legendre, P., Bouchard, A., 2009. Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest. Oecologia, 159: 377–388.10.1007/s00442-008-1214-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawton, J., 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84: 177–19210.2307/3546712]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazorík, M., Kula, E., 2015. Impact of weather and habitat on the occurrence of centipedes, millipedes and terrestrial isopods in mountain spruce forests. Folia Oecologica, 42: 103–112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P., 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74: 1659–1673.10.2307/1939924]Search in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P., Borcard, D., Peres-Neto, P.R., 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecological Monographs, 75: 435–450.10.1890/05-0549]Search in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P., Mi, X., Ren, H., Ma, K., Yu, M., Sun, I.-F., He, F., 2009. Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broadleaved forest of China. Ecology, 90: 663–67410.1890/07-1880.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Maraun, M., Martens, H., Migge, S., Theenhaus, A., Scheu, S., 2003. Adding to ‘the enigma of soil animal diversity’: fungal feeders and saprophagous soil invertebrattes prefer similar food substrates. European Journal of Soil Biology, 39: 85–95.10.1016/S1164-5563(03)00006-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathieu, J., Rossi, J.P., Grimaldi, M., Mora, P., Lavelle, P., Rouland, C., 2004. A multi-scale study of soil macrofauna biodiversity in Amazonian pastures. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40: 300–305.10.1007/s00374-004-0777-8]Search in Google Scholar
[McArdle, B.H., Anderson, M.J., 2004. Variance heterogeneity, transformations and models of species abundance: a cautionary tale. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61: 1294–1302.10.1139/f04-051]Search in Google Scholar
[Nekola, J.C., 2003. Large-scale terrestrial gastropod community composition patterns in the Great Lakes region of North America. Diversity and Distributions, 9: 55–71.10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00165.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ondina, P., Hermida, J., Outeiro, A., Mato, S., 2004. Relationships between terrestrial gastropod distribution and soil properties in Galicia (NW Spain). Applied Soil Ecology, 26 (1): 1–9.10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Pennisi, B. V., van Iersel, M., 2002. 3 ways to measure medium EC. GMPro, 22 (1): 46–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polláková, N., Šimanský, V., Jonczak, J., 2017. Characteristics of physical properties in soil profiles under selected introduced trees in the Nature Reserve Arboretum Mlyňany, Slovakia. Folia Oecologica, 44: 78–86.10.1515/foecol-2017-0010]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team, 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [cit. 2017-10-04]. https://www.R-project.org/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raunkier, C., 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossi, J.P., 2003. Clusters in earthworm spatial distribution. Pedobiologia, 47 (5–6): 490–496.10.1078/0031-4056-00218]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossi, J.-R., Lavelle, P., Tondoh, J.E., 1996. Statistical tool for soil biology. XI. Autocorrelogram and Mantel test. European Journal of Soil Biology, 32: 195–203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saetre, P., 1999. Spatial patterns of ground vegetation, soil microbial biomass and activity in a mixed spruce-birch stand. Ecography, 22: 183–19210.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00467.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, K., Migge, S., Norton, R.A., Scheu, S., Langel, R., Reineking, A., Maraun, M., 2004. Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, Acari): evidence from stable isotope ratios (N-15/N-14). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36: 1769–1774.10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.033]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoener, T.W., 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185 (4145): 27–39.10.1126/science.185.4145.2717779277]Search in Google Scholar
[Siefert, A., Ravenscroft, C., Weiser, M.D., Swenson, N.G., 2013. Functional beta-diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 6: 682–691.10.1111/geb.12030]Search in Google Scholar
[Soinenen, J., Lennon, J.J., Hillebrand, H., 2007. A multivariate analysis of beta diversity across organisms and environments. Ecology, 88: 2830–2838.10.1890/06-1730.118051652]Search in Google Scholar
[Stašiov, S., Svitok, M., 2014. The influence of stand density on the structure of centipede (Chilopoda) and millipede (Diplopoda) communities in the submountain beech forest. Folia Oecologica, 41: 195–201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Takeda, H., 1987. Dynamics and maintenance of Collembolan community structure in a forest soil system. Researches on Population Ecology, 29: 291–346.10.1007/BF02538892]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarasov, V.V., 2012. Flora Dnipropetrovs’koi’ ta Zaporiz’koi’ oblastej. Sudynni roslyny. Biologo-ekologichna harakterystyka vydiv [Flora of Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya regions. Vascular plants. Biological and ecological characteristics of the species]. Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovsk University Press. 296 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsatsenkin, I.A., 1970. Ekologicheskaya otsenka kormovykh ugodiy Karpat i Balkan po rastitel’nomu pokrovu [Ecological evaluation of the fodder lands of the Carpathians and the Balkans on vegetation]. Moscow: Institute of Forages. 192 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vadunina, A. F., Korchagina, S.A., 1986. Metody issledovaniya fizicheskikh svoĭstv pochv [Methods for research of physical properties of the soil]. Moskva: Agropromizdat. 416 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Viketoft, M., 2013. Determinants of small-scale spatial patterns: importance of space, plants and abiotics for soil nematodes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 62: 92–98.10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Wardle, D.A., 2006. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 9: 870–886.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00931.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Warren, M.W., Zou, X., 2002. Soil macrofauna and litter nutrients in three tropical tree plantations on a disturbed site in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management, 170: 161–171.10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00770-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Whalen, J.K., 2004. Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworm patches in corn field, hayfield and forest systems of southwestern Quebec, Canada. Applied Soil Ecology, 27 (2): 143–151.10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.04.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Whittaker, R.H., 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30: 279–338.10.2307/1943563]Search in Google Scholar
[Whittaker, R.H., 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxonomy, 21: 213–251.10.2307/1218190]Search in Google Scholar
[Widenfalk, L.A., Bengtsson, J., Berggren, Å., Zwiggelaar, K., Spijkman, E., Huyer-Brugman, F., Berg, M.P., 2015. Spatially structured environmental filtering of collembolan traits in late successional salt marsh vegetation. Oecologia, 179 (2): 537–549.10.1007/s00442-015-3345-z456800726001605]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, J.B., Habiba, G., 1995. Limitation to species coexistence: evidence for competition from field observations, using a patch model. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6: 369–376.10.2307/3236236]Search in Google Scholar
[Yorkina, N., Maslikova, K., Kunah, O., Zhukov, O., 2018. Analysis of the spatial organization of Vallonia pulchella (Muller, 1774) ecological niche in Technosols (Nikopol manganese ore basin, Ukraine). Ecologica Montenegrina, 17: 29–45.10.37828/em.2018.17.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A., Zadorozhnaya, G., 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: the ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35: 263–278.10.1515/eko-2016-0021]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A.V., 2015. Foromorfy v sisteme ekomorf pochvennykh zhivotnykh [Phoromorphs in the ecomorph system of soil animals]. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Biology, 25: 254–266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A.V., Kunakh, O.N., Novikova, V.A., 2015. Ekomorficheskaya organizaciya soobshchestv mezopedobiontov dubnyaka so svezhim raznotrav’em na arene r. Dnepr [The ecomorphic organization of the mesopedobiont community of an oak forest with the fresh grass in arena of the Dnieper river]. The Kharkov Entomological Society Gazette, 23 (2): 39–53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A.V., Shtirts, A.D., Zadorozhnaja, G.A., Kunah, O.N., 2013. Frakcionirovanie prostranstvennoj variacii soobshchestva pancirnyh kleshchej (Acari: Oribatida) v pochve sel’skohozyajstvennogo polya v usloviyah stepnoj zony Ukrainy [Fractionation of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) community spatial structure in the soil of an agricultural field in Ukraine’s steppe zone]. Problems of Ecology and Environmental Protection of Technogenic Region, 1 (13): 87–105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, O.V., Gubanova, N.L., 2015. Riznomanittya ta dynamika uhrupovan’ zemnovodnykh zaplavnykh ekosystem r. Samara-Dniprovs’ka [Diversity and dynamics of amphibians in floodplain ecosystems of the Samara river]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 23 (1): 66–73.10.15421/011510]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.M., Dubinina, Y.Y., Ganzha, D.S., 2017. Riznomanittya ta fitoindykatsiyni mozhlyvosti roslynnoho uhrupovannya [Diversity and phytoindication capacity of a plant community]. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7 (4): 81–99.10.15421/2017_90]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A., 2016. Funkcional’naya struktura soobshchestva mezopedobiontov dernovo-borovoj pochvy areny r. Dnepr [The functional organisation of the mesopedobionts community of sod pinewood soils on arena of the river Dnepr]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 24 (1): 26–39.10.15421/011604]Search in Google Scholar