Valuation approaches to ecosystem goods and services for the National Botanical Garden, Bangladesh

Ajzen I., Driver B.L. 1992. Contingent Value Measurement. On the Nature and Meaning of Willingness to Pay. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 4: 297–316.10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80057-5Search in Google Scholar

Bateman I.J., Langford I.H., Turner R.K, Willis K.G., Garrod, G.D. 1995. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 12: 161–179.10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-VOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bharali A., Mazumder R. 2012. Application of travel cost method to assess the pricing policy of public parks: The case of Kaziranga National Park. Journal of Regional Development and Planning, 1(1): 41–50.Search in Google Scholar

Blakemore F., William A. 2008. British Tourists' Valuation of a Turkish Beach Using Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods. Journal of Coastal Research, 24 (6): 1469–1480.10.2112/06-0813.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chen W., Hong H., Liu Y., Zhang L., Hou X., Raymond M. 2004. Recreation demands and economic value: an application of travel cost method for Xiamen Island. China Economic Review, 15, 4: 398–406.10.1016/j.chieco.2003.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clawson M. 1959. Methods of Measuring the Demand for a Value of Outdoor Recreation. Washington, DC, Resources for the Future: 36.Search in Google Scholar

Dwyer J.F., Peterson G.L., Darragh A.J. 1983. Remove from marked records estimating the value of urban forests using the travel cost method. Journal of Arboriculture, 9: 182–185.10.48044/jauf.1983.045Search in Google Scholar

Enyew S. 2003. Valuation of the Benefits of Out-door Recreation Using the travel Cost method: the case of Wabi-Shebelelangano Recreational Site. Adis Ababa University.Search in Google Scholar

Garrod G., Pickering A., Willis K. 1993. The Economic Value of Botanic Gardens: a Recreational Perspective. Geoforum, 24 (2): 215–224.10.1016/0016-7185(93)90035-GOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Greenstone M., Jack B.K. 2013. Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for a Young Field. NBER working paper (19426).10.3386/w19426Search in Google Scholar

Hanley N., Spash C. 1993. Cost benefit Analysis and the Environment. London: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Herath G., Kennedy J. 2004. Estimating the economic value of Mount Buffalo national park with the travel cost and contingent valuation models. Tourism Economics, 10: 63–78.10.5367/000000004773166529Search in Google Scholar

Indrila G.I., Ghosh S. 2009. Glimpse of the Tiger: How much are Indians willing to pay for it? (Working Paper No. 39-09). Retrieved from SANDEE economics and environment. http://www.sandeeonline.org/uploads/documents/publication/846_PUB_Working_Paper_39.Search in Google Scholar

Islam K., Majumder S.C. 2015. Economic Evaluation of Foy's lake, Chittagong using travel cost method. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 3(8): 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

Jabarin A.S., Damhoureyeh S.A. 2006. Estimating the Recreational Benefits of Dibeen National Park in Jordan Using Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9 (12): 2198–2206.10.3923/pjbs.2006.2198.2206Search in Google Scholar

Karen M., Sue S., Richard S.J. T. 2007. Comparing the Travel Cost Method and the Contingent Valuation Method – An Application of Convergent Validity Theory to the Recreational Value of Irish Forests. The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, No. 190.Search in Google Scholar

Kawsar M.H., Pavel A.A., Uddin M.B., Rahman S.A., Mamun M.A.A., Hassan S.B., Alam M.S., Tamrakar R., Wadud M.A. 2015. Quantifying Recreational Value and the Functional Relationship between Travel Cost and Visiting National Park. International Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1 (3): 84–89.Search in Google Scholar

Knapman B., Stanley O. 1991. A Travel Cost Analysis of Recreation Use Value of Kadau National Park. Canberra, Resource Assessment Commission Inquiry: 42.Search in Google Scholar

Limaei S.M., Ghesmati H., Rashidi R., Yamini N. 2014. Economic Evaluation of natural forest park using the travel cost method. Journal of Forest Science, 60(6): 254–261.10.17221/84/2013-JFSSearch in Google Scholar

Loomis B.J., Yorizane S., Larson D. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural Resource Economics Review, 29: 183–191.10.1017/S1068280500005311Search in Google Scholar

Mwebaze P., Bennett J. 2011. Valuing Botanic Collections: A Combined Travel Cost Collections: A Combined Travel-Cost and Contingent Valuation Survey in Australia. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/100688/2/Mwebaze.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Rolfe J., Gregg D. 2012. Valuing beach recreation across a regional area: The Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 69: 282–290.10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.019Search in Google Scholar

Shammin R.M. 1999. Application of the travel cost method (TCM): A case Study of Environmental valuation of Dhaka Zoological Garden. IUCN, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens T.H., Allen P.G. 1980. Estimating the benefits of recreation under conditions of congestion congestion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 7: 395–400.10.1016/0095-0696(80)90030-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tang T. 2009. An Application of Travel Cost Method to Yuelu Mountain Park in Changsha, China. (Master's Thesis, University of Helsinki).Search in Google Scholar

Timah P.N. 2011. Non-market Valuation of Beach Recreation using the Travel Cost Method (TCM) in the Context of the Developing World: An Application to Visitors of the Ngoé Beach in Kribi, Cameroon. (Master's Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural science).Search in Google Scholar

Weikard H.P. 2005. Why non-use values should not be used. Mansholt Graduate School working paper (22).10.1016/j.econmod.2005.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Zaiton S. 2008. Willingness to pay in Taman Negara: A contingent Valuation Method. International Journal of Economics and Management, 2 (1): 81–94.Search in Google Scholar