À propos de cet article

Citez

Bösch, M., Elsasser, P., Franz, K., Schneider, H., Lorenz, M., Moning, C., Olschewski, R., Roedl, A., Schröppel, B. & Weller P. (2018). Forest Ecosystem Services in rural areas of Germany - insights from the national TEEB study. Ecosystem Services, 31(Part A), 77−83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bujnovský, R. (2015). Evaluation of the ecosystem services of inland waters in the Slovak Republic - to date findings. Ekológia (Bratislava), 34(1), 19−25. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2015-0003.10.1515/eko-2015-0003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Collins, S. & Larry B. (2008). Caring for our natural assets: an ecosystems services perspective. In R.L. Deal (Ed.), Integrated restoration of forested ecosystems to achieve multi-resource benefits (pp. 1−11). Proceedings of the 2007 National Silviculture Workshop. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Search in Google Scholar

Cubbage, F., Harou, P. & Sills E. (2007). Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(7), 833−851. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010.10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Daily, G.C., Söderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jansson, A.-M., Jansson, B.-O., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Mäler, K.-G., Simpson, D., Starrett, D., Tilman, D. & Walker B. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395−396. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5478.395.10.1126/.289.5478.395Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Daily, G.C. (1997). Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington: Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deal, R.L., Cochran, B. & LaRocco G. (2012). Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 17, 69−76. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007.10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ecosystem Marketplace Database. https://www.forest-trends.org/project-list/#sSearch in Google Scholar

Engel, S., Pagiola, S. & Wunder S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice – An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663−674. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Farley, J. & Costanza R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.01010.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Forest Europe Expert Group and Workshop on a pan-European approach to valuation of forest ecosystem services. Belegrade Workshop, 24-25 September 2014, Final Report, https://www.foresteurope.org/documentos/Report_Valuation_FES_ForestEurope.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Garcia, S., Abildtrup, J. & Stenger A. (2018). How does economic research contribute to the management of forest ecosystem services?. Ann. For. Sci., 75(2), 53. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7.10.1007/s13595-018-0733-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Muradian R. (2015). In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of market-based instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecological Economics, 117, 217−224. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Huber-Stearns, H.R., Goldstein, J.H. & Duke E.A. (2013). Intermediary roles and payments for ecosystem services: a typology and program feasibility application in Panama. Ecosystem Services, 6, 104–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.006.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

IUCN Regional Office for Europe & IUCN Environmental Law Centre (2009). Final report study on the economic value of groundwater and biodiversity in European forests. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/pdf/grounwater_report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Kati, V., Hovardas, T., Dieterich, M., Ibisch, P.L., Mihok, B. & Selva N. (2015). The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conserv. Biol., 29(1), 260−270. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12366.10.1111/cobi.1236625103194Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kicko, P. (2017). Systém podpory v lesnom hospodárstve na plnenie mimoprodukčných funkcií lesov. In Financovanie podnikov v lesnom hospodárstve (pp. 109−116). Zborník vedeckých prác. Zvolen: Technická univerzita vo Zvolene.Search in Google Scholar

Kilgore, M.A, Ellefson, P.B, Funk, T.J. & Frey G.E. (2017). State property tax incentives for promoting ecosystem goods and services from private forest land in the United States: a review and analysis. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–228. Asheville: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station.10.2737/SRS-GTR-228Search in Google Scholar

LaRocco, G. & Deal R.L. (2011). Giving credit where credit is due: Increasing landowner compensation for ecosystem services. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-842. Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.10.2737/PNW-GTR-842Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Z., Butler, B.J., Catanzaro, P.F., Greene, J.L., Hewes, J.H., Kilgore, M.A., Kittredge, D.B. & Tyrrell M. (2014). The effectiveness of state preferential property tax programs in conserving forests: Comparisons, measurements, and challenges. Land Use Policy, 36, 492–499. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.016.10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.016Search in Google Scholar

Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieux, P., Fiorina, Ch., Santos-Martín, F., Paracchini, M.L., Keune, H., Wittmer, H., Hauck, J., Fiala, I., Verburg, P.H., Condé, S., Schägner, J.P., San Miguel, J., Estreguil, Ch., Ostermann, O., Barredo, J.I., Pereira, H.M., Stott, A., Laporte, V., Mainer, A., Olah, B., Royo Gelabert, E., Spyropoulou, R., Petersen, J.E., Maguire, C., Zal, N., Achilleos, E., Rubin, A., Ledoux, L., Brown, C., Raes, C., Jacobs, S., Vandewalle, M., Connor, D. & Bidoglio G. (2013). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Luxemburg: Publication office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2779/12398.10.2779/12398Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Murphy, P., Paracchini, M.L., Barredo, J.I., Grizzetti, B., Cardoso, A., Somma, F., Petersen, J.E., Meiner, A., Gelabert, E.R., Zal, N., Kristensen, P., Bastrup-Birk, A., Biala, K., Romao, C., Piroddi, Ch., Egoh, B., Florina, Ch., Santos, F., Naruševičius, V., Verboven, J., Pereira, H., Bengtsson, J., Kremena, G., Pedroso-Marta, C., Snäll, T., Esterguil, Ch., San Miguel, J., Braat, L., Gret-Regamey, A., Perez-Soba, M., Degeorges, P., Beaufaron, G., Lillebø, A., Marak, A.D., Liquette, C., Condé, S., Moen, J., Östergard, H., Czúcz, B., Drakou, E.G., Zulian, G. & Lavalle C. (2014). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem and their Services. Indicators for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Luxemburg: Publication office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2779/75203.10.2779/75203Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Machar, I. (2013). Applying landscape ecological principles in sustainable forest management of the floodplain forest in the temperate zone of Europe. Ekológia (Bratislava), 32(4), 369−375. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2013-0034.10.2478/eko-2013-0034Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Matzdorf, B., Sattler, C. & Engel S. (2013). Institutional frameworks and governance structures of PES schemes. Forest Policy and Economics, 37, 57−64. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.002.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mavsar, R., Weiss, G., Ramčilović, S., Palahí, M., Rametsteiner, E., Tykkä, S., van Apeldoorn, R., Vreke, J., van Wijk, M., Prokofieva, I., Rekola, M. & Kuuluvainen J. (2008). Study on the development and marketing of non-market products and services. Study report.Search in Google Scholar

MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Mercer, D.E. (2004). Policies for encouraging forest restoration. In J.A. Stanturf & P. Madsen (Eds.). Restoration of boreal and temperate forests (pp. 97−109). Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9780203497784.pt3Search in Google Scholar

Miceikiene, A. & Butvilaite A. (2015). Evaluation of the experience in environmental tax reforms in the EU countries. European Scientific Journal, 11(19), 280−299.Search in Google Scholar

Nasi, R., Wunder, S. & Campos J. (2002). Forest ecosystem services: Can they pay our way out of deforestation? Paper presented at the roundtable on forests sponsored by the Global Environment Facility; 11 March, New York. Bogor (Indonesia): CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research), for Global Environment Facility.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2010). Paying for biodiversity: Enhancing the cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services. OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264090279-enSearch in Google Scholar

Pagiola, S., Bishop, J. & Landell-Mills N. (Eds.) (2002). Selling forest environmental services. Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development. London: Earthscan.Search in Google Scholar

Perrot-Maître, D. (2006). The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: a “perfect” PES case. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Search in Google Scholar

Prokofieva, I. (2016). Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests. Current Forestry Reports, 2(2), 130–142. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-016-0037-9.10.1007/s40725-016-0037-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Raitanen, E., Simila, J., Siikavirta, K. & Primmer E. (2013). Economic instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation & the EU state aid regulation. Journal of European Environmental & Planning Law, 10(1), 6–28. DOI: 10.1163/18760104-01001002.10.1163/18760104-01001002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sarvašová, Z., Šálka, J. & Dobšinská Z. (2013). Mechanism of cross-sectoral coordination between nature protection and forestry in the Natura 2000 formulation process in Slovakia. J. Environ. Manag., 127, S65−S72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.005.10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.00522771263Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schlegelmilch, K. (2002). Overview and recent experiences with ecological tax reforms in Europe. In J. Holst, D. Lee & E. Olson (Eds.), Finance for sustainable development: Testing new policy approaches (pp. 221−245). New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

Schomers, S. & Matzdorf B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6, 16−30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schütz, J.P., Saniga, M., Diaci, J. & Vrška T. (2016). Comparing close-to-nature silviculture with processes in pristine forests: lessons from Central Europe. Ann. For. Sci., 73(4), 911−921. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-016-0579-9.10.1007/s13595-016-0579-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Smith, A.C., Harrison, P.A., Pérez Soba, M., Archaux, F., Blicharska, M., Egoh, B.N., Erős, T., Fabrega Domenech, N., György, Á.I., Haines-Young, R., Li, S., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Miguel Ayala, L., Mononen, L., Simpson, G., Stange, E., Turkelboom, F., Uiterwijk, M., Veerkamp, C.J. & de Echeverria V.W. (2017). How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: a typology derived from a systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 26, 111−126. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006.10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Smith, S., Rowcroft, P., Everard, M., Couldrick, L., Reed, M., Rogers, H., Quick, T., Eves, Ch. & White C. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: a best practice guide. London: Defra.Search in Google Scholar

Stanton, T., Echavarria, M., Hamilton, K. & Ott C. (2010). State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/state-of-watershed-payments/Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, E. (1996). Recuperating from market failure: planning for biodiversity and technological competitiveness. Public Administration Review, 56, 21−34.10.2307/3110050Search in Google Scholar

Šálka, J. (2006). Analýza verejnej politiky v lesníctve. Zvolen: Technická Univerzita vo Zvolene.Search in Google Scholar

Šálka, J. & Dobšinská Z. (2013). Policy Analysis for assuring forest ecosystem externalities. Zvolen: Technická Univerzita vo Zvolene.Search in Google Scholar

UNECE (2005). Seminar on environmental services and financing for the protection and sustainable use of ecosystems. Geneva, 10-11 October 2005. National reports. http://www.unece.org/env/water/meetings/payment_ecosystems/seminar.htm.Search in Google Scholar

UNECE (2014). The value of forests payments for ecosystem services in green economy. Geneva Forest and Timber Study Paper 34. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/SP-34Xsmall.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245–1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Venter, O., Laurance, W., Iwamura, T., Wilson, K., Fuller, R. & Possingham H. (2009). Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Science, 326(5958), 1368. DOI: 10.1126/science.1180289.10.1126/.1180289Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Viszlai, I., Barredo, J.I. & San-Miguel-Ayanz J. (2016). Payments for forest ecosystem services: SWOT analysis and possibilities for implementation. Joint Research Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.Search in Google Scholar

Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zandersen, M., Grønvik Bråten, K. & Lindhjem H. (2009). Payment for and management of ecosystem services - Issues and options in the Nordic context payment for and management of ecosystem services. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1337-947X
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Chemistry, Environmental Chemistry, Geosciences, Geography, Life Sciences, Ecology, other