THE INCIDENCE AND TYPE OF CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS FROM PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF 3800 PATIENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

1. Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 49(5): 995-1013.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

3. Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ, Eds. ISCN (2009): an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel: S. Karger, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

4. Boue A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn. 1984; 4(special issue): 45-67. (Author: is this correct?)10.1002/pd.19700407056463033Search in Google Scholar

5. Honda H, Miharu N, Samura O, He H, Ohama K. Meiotic segregation analysis of a 14;21 Robertsonian translocation carrier by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet. 2000; 106(2): 188-193.10.1007/s004399900216Search in Google Scholar

6. Morel F, Roux C, Bresson JL. FISH analysis of the chromosomal status of spermatozoa from three men with 45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10) karyotype. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001; 7(5): 483-488.10.1093/molehr/7.5.48311331672Search in Google Scholar

7. Anton E, Blanco J, Egozcue J, Vidal F. Sperm FISH studies in seven male carriers of Robertsonian transloca-tion t(13;14)(q10;q10). Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(6): 1345-1351.10.1093/humrep/deh23215117905Search in Google Scholar

8. Vidal F, Templado C, Navarro J, Marina S, Egozcue J. Meiotic and synaptonemal complex studies in a 14/21 translocation carrier. Int J Androl. 1982; 5(1): 21-26.10.1111/j.1365-2605.1982.tb00229.x7068254Search in Google Scholar

9. Templado C, Vidal F, Navarro J, Marina S, Egozcue J. Meiotic studies and synaptonemal complex analysis in two infertile males with a 13/14 balanced translocation. Hum Genet. 1984; 67(2): 162-165.10.1007/BF002729926745935Search in Google Scholar

10. Ferguson-Smith MA. Prenatal chromosome analysis and its impact on the birth incidence of chromosome disorders. Br Med Bull. 1983; 39(4): 355-364.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a0718486227360Search in Google Scholar

11. Hook EB. Rates of chromosomal abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 58(3): 282-285.Search in Google Scholar

12. Bugge M, deLozier-Blanchet C, Bak M, Brandt CA, Hertz JM, Nielsen JB, et al. Trisomy 13 due to rea(13q;13q) is caused by i(13) and not rob(13;13)(q10; q10) in the majority of cases. Am J Med Genet A, 2005; 132(3): 310-313.10.1002/ajmg.a.3047415690377Search in Google Scholar

13. Wagstaff J, Hemann M. A familial “balanced” 3;9 translocation with cryptic 8q insertion leading to deletion and duplication of 9p23 loci in siblings. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56(1): 302-309.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dufke A, Mayrhofer H, Enders H, Kaiser P, Leipoldt M. Unusual chromosomal mosaicism as a cause of mental retardation and congenital malformations in a familial reciprocal translocation carrier, t(17;22)(q24.2; q11.23). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001; 93(3-4): 168-170.10.1159/00005697911528107Search in Google Scholar

15. Crolla JA, van Heyningen V. Frequent chromosome aberrations revealed by molecular cytogenetic studies in patients with aniridia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71(5): 1138-1149.10.1086/34439638508912386836Search in Google Scholar

16. Bowser-Riley SM, Griffiths MJ, Creasy MR, Farndon PA, Martin KE, Thomson DAG, et al. Are double translocations double trouble? J Med Genet. 1988; 25(5): 326-331.10.1136/jmg.25.5.32610504593290489Search in Google Scholar

17. Douet-Guilbert N, Bris MJ, Amice V, Marchetti C, Delobel B, Amice J, et al. Interchromosomal effect in sperm of males with translocations: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Int J Androl. 2005; 28(6): 372-379.10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00571.x16300670Search in Google Scholar

18. Vasilevska M, Anevska Mitrevska A, Stefanovska AM, Sekovska E, Adamoska S, Dimeska G. De novo apparently balanced reciprocal (X;10) translocation from prenatal diagnosis of IVF achieved pregnancy. Chromosome Res. 2009; 17(Suppl): 13-45.Search in Google Scholar

19. Schmidt M, Du Sart D. Functional disomies of the X chromosome influence the cell selection and hence the X inactivation pattern in females with balanced X-autosome translocations: a review of 122 cases. Am J Med Genet. 1992; 42(2): 161-169.10.1002/ajmg.13204202051733164Search in Google Scholar