Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Édition 2 (2017): Edition 2 (July 2017)
Accès libre
Bifurcation Analysis of Hysteretic Systems with Saddle Dynamics
Marina Esteban
Marina Esteban
,
Enrique Ponce
Enrique Ponce
et
Francisco Torres
Francisco Torres
| 04 nov. 2017
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Édition 2 (2017): Edition 2 (July 2017)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Publié en ligne:
04 nov. 2017
Pages:
449 - 464
Reçu:
06 avr. 2017
Accepté:
04 nov. 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21042/AMNS.2017.2.00036
Mots clés
Bifurcations
,
Hysteresis
,
Periodic Orbits
© 2017 Marina Esteban, Enrique Ponce, Francisco Torres, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
The transition mechanism between systems (SU) and (SL). We use blue colour for solutions of the upper system and red colour for solutions of the lower one. We can see also the falls at the line Σ+ and the rises at the line Σ−.
Fig. 2
The ‘graph’ of a normalized hysteresis function. The hysteresis value H(x) is unambiguous for x < −1 and x > 1. However, for −1 ⩽ x ⩽ 1 the output depends on the past, as explained in the text.
Fig. 3
The saddle point (xE, yE) and its invariant manifolds for the upper system (SU). Other distinguished values are emphasized.
Fig. 4
Bifurcation set in the parameter plane (γ, yE) for xE < −1. We emphasized the number of symmetric periodic orbits in each region.
Fig. 5
The transition map U for different values of the parameter yE and γ ∈ (−1, 0). The black points in this figure represent the point u*=(u−*,u+*) $u^*=(u^*_-,u^*_+)$ for each case.
Fig. 6
The transition map U for different values of yE. Again, the terminal black points in this figure represent the point u*=(u−*,u+*) $u^*=(u^*_-,u^*_+)$ for each case.
Fig. 7
The two symmetric periodic orbits existing for (xE, yE) = (−2, −1) and γ = 0.8. One of them takes the three zones and is unstable. The other one takes only the central zone and is stable. The blue lines (resp. red lines) correspond to valid solutions for the SU−system (resp. SL−system).
Fig. 8
Typical graph for φ(Z) and surfaceX=φ(Z).