<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Translation is not mere translation. A few remarks on the translation of a fragmentary bilingual text: <italic>Cuvântul nisiparniță</italic> (<italic>Le Mot sablier/The Hourglass Word</italic>) by Dumitru TsepeneagThe present paper will focus on the translation of a fragmentary bilingual writing. Interested both in his own monolingualism and in the <italic>monolingualism of the other</italic> (see Derrida 1996, and here mainly the monolingualism of the French reader who should constitute a kind of pseudo-source-audience3), Dumitru Tsepeneag turns his own bilingualism into a topic in his book <italic>Cuvîntul nisiparniță</italic> (published first in translation as <italic>Le Mot sablier</italic> in 1984). “This (im)possible appropriation becomes the generating reason <italic>of</italic> the creation and <italic>in</italic> the creation, then in the self-translation”; a “writing experience” where the writer cultivates his bilingualism and his biculturalism, and sheds light on the process of translation from a perspective that is at least double: that of the translated42 and self-translated writer, but also that of the translator-writer” (Lungu-Badea 2008, 20). What translation strategy would be appropriate for a book that begins in Romanian and ends in French? We could claim that its destiny is to show how one language replaces another and, consequently, renders translation useless for bilingual users. If this is but an argument for the counter-translation, the French translation, published by the P.O.L. publishing house, does not challenge it. It could respect neither “the psychological intention of the author” (Ladmiral 2006, 140), nor the “semantic intention of the text” (Ladmiral and Lipiansky 1995, 53).</abstract>

Translation is not mere translation. A few remarks on the translation of a fragmentary bilingual text: Cuvântul nisiparniță (Le Mot sablier/The Hourglass Word) by Dumitru TsepeneagThe present paper will focus on the translation of a fragmentary bilingual writing. Interested both in his own monolingualism and in the monolingualism of the other (see Derrida 1996, and here mainly the monolingualism of the French reader who should constitute a kind of pseudo-source-audience3), Dumitru Tsepeneag turns his own bilingualism into a topic in his book Cuvîntul nisiparniță (published first in translation as Le Mot sablier in 1984). “This (im)possible appropriation becomes the generating reason of the creation and in the creation, then in the self-translation”; a “writing experience” where the writer cultivates his bilingualism and his biculturalism, and sheds light on the process of translation from a perspective that is at least double: that of the translated42 and self-translated writer, but also that of the translator-writer” (Lungu-Badea 2008, 20). What translation strategy would be appropriate for a book that begins in Romanian and ends in French? We could claim that its destiny is to show how one language replaces another and, consequently, renders translation useless for bilingual users. If this is but an argument for the counter-translation, the French translation, published by the P.O.L. publishing house, does not challenge it. It could respect neither “the psychological intention of the author” (Ladmiral 2006, 140), nor the “semantic intention of the text” (Ladmiral and Lipiansky 1995, 53).

La traduction n’est pas qu’une traduction. Quelques propos sur la traduction d’une écriture fragmentaire bilingue: <italic>Cuvântul nisiparniţă</italic> (<italic>Le Mot sablier</italic>) de Dumitru Tsepeneag

Translationes

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

La traduction n’est pas qu’une traduction. Quelques propos sur la traduction d’une écriture fragmentaire bilingue:  () de Dumitru Tsepeneag

Translation is not mere translation. A few remarks on the translation of a fragmentary bilingual text: Cuvântul nisiparniță (Le Mot sablier/The Hourglass Word)...

La traduction n’est pas qu’une traduction. Quelques propos sur la traduction d’une écriture fragmentaire bilingue: Cuvântul nisiparniţă (Le Mot sablier) de Dumitru Tsepeneag

Publié en ligne: 23 sept. 2017

Pages: 25 - 39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tran-2017-0001

Mots clés
translation, bilingual writing, counter-translation, fragmentary bilingual writing

© 2017 Georgiana Lungu-Badea, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

La traduction n’est pas qu’une traduction. Quelques propos sur la traduction d’une écriture fragmentaire bilingue: Cuvântul nisiparniţă (Le Mot sablier) de Dumitru Tsepeneag

Publié en ligne: 23 sept. 2017

Pages: 25 - 39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tran-2017-0001

Mots cléstranslation, bilingual writing, counter-translation, fragmentary bilingual writing

© 2017 Georgiana Lungu-Badea, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
translation, bilingual writing, counter-translation, fragmentary bilingual writing