[1. Abbott, E. A History of Celibacy. Da Capo Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, Inc.: New York, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Barraza, J. A., Zak, P. J. Empathy Toward Strangers Triggers Oxytocin Release and Subsequent Generosity. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci, 1167, 2009, pp. 182-189.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04504.x19580564]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Batra, S. W. T. Behavior of Some Social and Solitary Halictine Bees within Their Nests: A Comparative Study (Himenoptera: Halictidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 41(1), 1968, pp. 120-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Batson, D. C. The Altruism Question: Towards a Social-Psychological Answer. Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bellah, R. N. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University: Cambridge, MA, 2011.10.4159/harvard.9780674063099]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bender, J., Kiersz, A., Rosen, A. Some States Have Much Higher Enlistment Rates Than Others, Business Insider. 2014, http://www.businessinsider.com/us-military-is-not-representative-of-country-2014-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Belin, P., Ladd D. R. A Neural Marker for Social Bias towards In-Group Accents. Cerebral Cortex, 2014, pp. 1-9.10.1093/cercor/bhu282458552525452578]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Betzig, L. Medieval Monogamy. Journal of Family History, 20(2), 1995, pp. 181-216. 10.1177/036319909602000204]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Betzig, L. Means, Variances, and Ranges in Reproductive Success: Comparative Evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 2012, pp. 309-317.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.008]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Boehm, C. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.10.4159/9780674028449]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Boehm, C. Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism and Shame. Basic Books: New York, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Bowles, S., Gintis, H. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Brooks, A. C. Gross National Happiness: Why Happiness Matters for Americans - and How We Can Get More of It. Basic Books: New York, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Bruneau, E. G. Attitudes Towards the Out-Group are Predicted by Activity in the Precuneus in Arabs and Israelis. Neuroimage, 52(4), 2010, pp. 1704-1711.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.05720510370]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Bruneau, E. G., Dufour, N., Saxe, R. Social Cognition in Members in Conflict Groups: Behavioral and Neural Responses in Arabs, Israelis and South Americans to Each Others’ Misfortunes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 367, 2012, pp. 717-730.10.1098/rstb.2011.0293326084722271787]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Bulbulia, J. et al. (eds.) The Evolution of Religion: Studies, Theories, & Critiques. Collins Foundation Press: Santa Margarita, CA, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Burdette, A. M. et al. Serving God and country? Religious Involvement and Military Service among Young Men. Journal Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 2009, pp. 794-904.10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01481.x344226122984296]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Campbell, J. The Many Faces of God: Science’s 400-Year Quest for Images of the Divine. W. W. Norton & Company: New York, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Carr, L. et al. Neural Mechanisms of Empathy in Humans: A Relay from Neural Systems for Imitation to Limbic Areas. PNAS, 100(9), 2002, pp. 5497-5502.10.1073/pnas.093584510015437312682281]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Doubleday: New York, NY, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Chak, S. T. C., Bauer, R., Thiel, M. Social Behavior and Recognition in Decapod Shrimps with Emphasis on the Caridea. In. L. Aquiloni, E. Tricarico (eds.). Social Recognition in Invertebrates: The Knowns and the Unknowns. Springer: Berlin, 2015, pp. 57-84]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Cloninger, R. C. The Psychobiological Regulation of Social Cooperation. Nat Med, 1, 1995, pp. 623-625.10.1038/nm0795-6237585135]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Cloninger, R. C., Kedia, S. The Phylogenesis of Human Personality: Indentifying the Precursors of Cooperation, Altruism and Well-Being. In. R. W. Sussman, C. R. Cloninger (eds.). Origins of Altruism and Cooperation, Springer: New York, 2011, pp. 63-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Cochini, C. Apostolic Origins of Priestly Celibacy. Ignatius Press: San Francisco, CA, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Cooper, A. Raw Data: Religious Preferences in the Military, 2009. http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/12/raw-data-religious-preference-in-the-military/]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Cram, L. et al. Implicit Indicators of National Identity Modulate Brain Activation When Processing Empathy for In-Group and Out-Group Members in Pain. Abstract from BNA 2015, Festival of Neuroscience, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2015, pp. 671-672.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1978.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. De Cantanzaro, D. Suicide and Self-Damaging Behavior: A Sociobiological Perspective. Academic Press: New York, 1981.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Decety, J. The Neural Pathways, Development and Functions of Empathy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2015, pp. 1-6.10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Decety, J, Ickes W. The Social Science of Empathy. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2009.10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[32. De Dreu, C. K. W. et al. Oxytocin Promotes Human Ethnocentrism. PNAS, 108(4), 2011, pp. 1262-1266.10.1073/pnas.1015316108302970821220339]Search in Google Scholar
[33. de Vignemont, F., Singer, T. The Empathic Brain: How, When and Why? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(10), 2006, pp. 435-441. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.00816949331]Search in Google Scholar
[34. de Waal, F. Chimpanzee Politics. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, 2007.10.56021/9780801886560]Search in Google Scholar
[35. de Waal, F. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. Three Rivers Press: New York: 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. de Waal, F. The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism among the Primates. W. W. Norton & Company: New York, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Diaz-Munoz, S. L. Cooperating to Compete: Altruism, Sexual selection and Causes of Male Reproductive Cooperation. Animal Behavior, 88, 2013, pp. 67-78.10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.008]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Duffy, J. E. Eusociality in a Coral-Reef Shrimp. Nature, 381 (6 June), 1996, pp. 512-514.10.1038/381512a0]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Dunkel, C. S., Dutton, E. Religiosity as a Predictor of In-Group Favoritism within and between Religious Groups. Personality and individual differences, 98, 2016, pp. 311-314.10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.063]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Dyshniku, F. et al. Minor Physical Anomalies as a Window into Prenatal Origins of Pedophilia. Arch Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 2015, pp. 215-259.10.1007/s10508-015-0564-726058490]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Ethology: The Biology of Behavior, 2nd Edition. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.: New York, 1975.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Human Ethology. Aldine de Gruyter: New York, 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Dominance, Submission, and Love: Sexual Pathologies from the Perspective of Ethology. In. J. R. Feierman (ed.). Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions. Springer: New York, 1990, pp. 150-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Us and Others: The Familial Roots of Ethnonationalism. In. I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, F. K. Slater (eds.). Ethnic Conflict and Indoctrination: Altruism and Identity in Evolutionary Perspecive Berghahn Books: New York, 1998, pp. 21-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A. The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 1987, pp. 91-119.10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Eliade, M. Patterns in Comparative Religion. Meridian Books: New York, 1958.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Erdos, R., Ortiz, A. American Indian Myths and Legends. Pantheon Books: New York, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Feierman, J. R. A Biosocial Overview of Adult Human Sexual Behavior with Children and Adolescents. In. J. R. Feierman (ed.). Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions Springer: New York, 1990, pp. 8-68.10.1007/978-1-4613-9682-6_2]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Feierman, J. R. (ed.). The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion Praeger/ABC-CIO: Santa Barbara, CA, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Feierman, J. R. How Some Major Components of Religion Could Have Evolved by Natural Selection. In. E. Voland, W. Schiefenhövel (eds.). The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior. Springer, Berlin, 2009, pp. 51-6610.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_4]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Feierman, J. R. The Evolutionary History of Religious Behavior. In. J. R. Feierman (ed.). The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion Praeger/ABC-CIO: Santa Barbara, CA, 2009, pp. 71-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Feierman, J. R. Pedophilia: Its Relationship to the Homosexualities and the Roman Catholic Church, Parts I and II. Antonianum, LXXXXV (3, 4), 2010, https://www.academia.edu/4176446/Pedophilia_Its_Relationship_to_the_Homosexualities_and_the_Roman_Catholic_Church_Part_I, pp. 451-477, https://www.academia.edu/4176464/Pedophilia_Its_Relationship_to_the_Homosexualities_and_the_Roman_Catholic_Church_Part_II, 617-649.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Feierman, J. R. The Image of the God to Whom We Pray: An Evolutionary Psychobiological Perspective. Pensamiento, 67(254), 2011, https://www.academia.edu/4176259/The_Image_of_the_God_to_Whom_We_Pray_An_Evolutionary_Psychobiological_Perspective, pp. 817-829.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Feierman, J. R. The Biology of Religious Belief, Emotion and Behavior: A Natural Science Perspective. In. D. Evers et al. (eds.). Studies in Science and Theology. Yearbook of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, 15 (2015/2016), 2016, https://www.academia.edu/24397969/The_Biology_of_Religious_Belief_Emotion_and_Behavior_A_Natural_Science_Perspective, pp. 41-62.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Galen, L. W. Does Religious Belief Promote Prosociality? A Critical Examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 2012, pp. 876-906.10.1037/a0028251]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Gallese, V. The ‘Shared Manifold’ Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 2001, pp. 33-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Goodwin, G. Myths and Tales of the White Mountain Apache. The University of Arizona Press: Tucson, 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Gowdy, J., Krall, L. The Economic Origins of Ultrasociality. Behav Brain Sci, Apr 27, 2015, pp. 1-63.10.1017/S0140525X1500059X]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Grammer, K. Signale der Liebe: Die Biologischen Gesetze der Partnerschaft. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH & Co. KG: München, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Gronbjerg, K. A., Never, B. The Role of Religious Networks and Other Factors in Types of Volunteer Work. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 2004, pp. 263-289.10.1002/nml.34]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Hager, R., Jones, C. B. (eds.). Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511641954]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Hamilton, W. D. The Genetical Theory of Social Behavior, Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 12(1), 1964, pp. 12-45.10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Hammer, M. F. et al. Sex-Biased Evolutionary Forces Shape Genomic Patterns of Human Diversity. PLOS Genetics, Sept. 36, 2008, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000202.]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Hardy, A. The Biology of God: A Scientist’s Study of Man the Religious Animal. New York: Taplinger Publishing Company, 1975.]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Harris, L. T., Fiske, S. T. Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 2006, pp. 847-853.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x17100784]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Heid, S. Celibacy in the Early Church: The Beginning of a Discipline of Obligatory Continence for Clerics in East and West. Ignatius Press: San Francisco, CA, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Herzmann, G., Curran, T. Neural Correlates of the In-Group Memory Advantage on the Encoding and Recognition of Faces. PLOS ONE, 8(12), 2013, e82797. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082797.10.1371/journal.pone.0082797386614124358226]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Hill, K. R. et al. Co-Residence Patterns in Hunter-Gather Societies Show Unique Human Social Structure. Science, 331(6022), 2011, pp. 1286-1289.]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Hobson, N. M., Inzlicht, M. The Mere Presence of an Out-Group Member Disrupts the Brain’s Feedback-Monitoring System. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2016, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw082, pp. 1-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Hrdy, S. B. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Jacob, S. et al. Paternally Inherited HLA Alleles Are Associated with Women’s Choice of Male Odor. Nature Genetics, 30, 2002, pp. 175-179.10.1038/ng83011799397]Search in Google Scholar
[72. James, W. Biological and Psychosocial Determinants of Male and Female Sexual Orientation. Journal of Biological Science, 37(5), 2005, pp. 555-567.10.1017/S002193200400705916174346]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Joiner et al. Suicide as a Derangement of the Self-Sacrificial Aspect of Eusociality. Psychological Review, 123(3), 2016, pp. 235-254.10.1037/rev0000020787189626524155]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Kandler, C. et al. The Genetic and Environmental Roots of Variance in Negativity toward Foreign Nationals. Behav Genet, 45(2), 2015, pp. 181-199.10.1007/s10519-014-9700-825534512]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Knutson, K. M. Politics on the Brain: An fMRI Investigation. Soc. Neurosci., 1(1), 2007, pp. 25-40. 10.1080/17470910600670603182868917372621]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Korte, A-M., de Haardt, M. The Boundaries of Monotheism: Interdisciplinary Explorations into the Foundations of Western Monotheism. Brill: Leiden, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Krasnec, M. O., Breed, M. D. Eusocial Evolution and the Recognition System in Social Insects. Adv Exp Med Biol, 739, 2012, pp. 78-92.10.1007/978-1-4614-1704-0_522399396]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Kruger, D. J. Socio-Demographic Factors Intensifying Male Mating Competition Exacerbate Male Mortality Rates. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(2), 2010, pp. 194-204.10.1177/147470491000800205]Search in Google Scholar
[79. Kruger, D. J., Fitzgerald, C. J. Understanding Sex Differences in Human Mortality Rates through Tinbergen’s Four Questions. Human Ethology Bulletin, 26(2), 2011, pp. 8-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[80. Lankford, A. Is Suicide Terrorism Really the Product of an Evolved Sacrificial Tendency? A Review of Mammalian Research and Application of Evolutionary Theory. Comprehensive Psychology, 4, article 21, 2015. doi: 10.2466/12.19CP.4.21.]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Lazerwitz, B. Membership in Voluntary Associations and Frequency of Church Attendance. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2, 1962, pp. 74-84.10.2307/1384095]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Leeming, D. A., Leeming, M. A. Dictionary of Creation Myths. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1994.10.1093/acref/9780195102758.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Leighton, D. R. Gibbons: Territoriality and Monogamy. In. B. B. Smuts et al. (eds.). Primate Societies (pp. 135-145). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Lipka, M. How Highly Religious Americans’ Lives Are Different from Others, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/12/how-highly-religious-americans-lives-are-differentfrom-others/.]Search in Google Scholar
[85. Lorenz, K. V. Analogy as a Source of Knowledge. Science, 185(4147), 1974, pp. 229-234.]Search in Google Scholar
[86. Luo, S. et al. Oxytocin Receptor Gene and Racial In-Group Bias in Empathy-Related Brain Activity. Neuroimage, 110, 2015, pp. 22-31.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.04225637390]Search in Google Scholar
[87. Luy, M. Causes of Male Excess Mortality: Insights from Cloistered Populations. Population and Development, 39(4), 2003, pp. 647-676.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00647.x]Search in Google Scholar
[88. Lynch, J. H. The Medieval Church. Longman: London, 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[89. MacDonald, K. The Establishment and Maintenance of Socially Imposed Monogamy in Western Europe. Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 1995, pp. 2-23.10.1017/S0730938400011679]Search in Google Scholar
[90. Mackey, W. C. Fathering Behaviors: The Dynamics of the Man-Child Bond. Plenum Press: New York, 1985.10.1007/978-1-4613-2425-6]Search in Google Scholar
[91. Martin, L. H., Wiebe, D. Pro- and Assortative-Sociality in the Formation and Maintenance of Religious Groups. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 2(1), 2014, pp. 1-57.10.1558/jcsr.v2i1.5]Search in Google Scholar
[92. Mitchell, R. W. A Comparative-Developmental Approach to Understanding Imitation. In. P. Bateson & P. Klopfer (eds.). Perspectives in Ethology, Volume 7: Alternatives Plenum Press: New York, 1987, pp. 183-215.10.1007/978-1-4613-1815-6_7]Search in Google Scholar
[93. Molenberghs, P. et al. Increased Moral Sensitivity for Outgroup Perpetrators Harming In-Group Members. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1), 2016, pp. 225-233.10.1093/cercor/bhu19525183886]Search in Google Scholar
[94. Monsma, S. V. Religion and Philanthropic Giving and Volunteerism: Building Blocks for Civic Responsibility. Interdisciplinary Journal of Religious Research, 3, 2007, pp. 2-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[95. Moussaid, M. et al. Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation. PLOS ONE, 8(11), 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078433.]Search in Google Scholar
[96. Neusner, J., Chilton, B. Altruism in World Religions. Georgetown University Press: Washington, D. C., 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[97. New American Bible. World Catholic Press: Totowa, NJ, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[98. Norenzayan, A. et al.. The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356.]Search in Google Scholar
[99. Nowak, M. A., Highfield, R. SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. Free Press: New York, 2011. ]Search in Google Scholar
[100. Nowak, M. A., Sigmund, K. Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity. Nature, 437(17 October), 2005, pp. 1291-1298.10.1038/nature0413116251955]Search in Google Scholar
[101. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., Wilson, E. O. The Evolution of Eusociality. Nature, 466 (26 August), 2010, pp. 1057-1062.10.1038/nature09205327973920740005]Search in Google Scholar
[102. Oman, D. Spiritual Modeling and the Social Learning of Spirituality and Religion. In. K. Pargament (ed.). APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion and Spirituality: Vol 1. Context, Theory, and Research.American Psychological Association Press: Washington, D. C., 2013, pp. 187-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[103. O’Riain, M. J., Jarvis, J. U. M. Colony Member Recognition and Xenophobia in the Naked Mole Rat. Animal Behavior, 53(3), 1997, pp. 487-498.10.1006/anbe.1996.0299]Search in Google Scholar
[104. Oviedo, L. Religious Attitudes and Prosocial Behavior: A Systematic Review of Published Research. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 6(2), 2016, pp. 169-184.10.1080/2153599X.2014.992803]Search in Google Scholar
[105. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2016. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/caste]Search in Google Scholar
[106. Pharoah, C., Tanner, S. Trends in Charitable Giving. Fiscal Studies, 18, 1997, pp. 427-443.10.1111/j.1475-5890.1997.tb00272.x]Search in Google Scholar
[107. Phelps, E. A. Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala. Annu Rev Psychol, 57, 2006, pp. 27-53.10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.07023416318588]Search in Google Scholar
[108. Phipps, W. E. Clerical Celibacy: The Heritage. Continuum: New York, NY, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[109. Powers, S. T., van Schaik, C. P., Lehmann, L. How Institutions Shaped the Last Major Evolutionary Transition to Large-Scale Human Societies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2016, 371(1687): 20150098. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0098.]Search in Google Scholar
[110. Purzycki, B. G. Moralistic Gods, Supernatural Punishment and the Expansion of Human Sociality. Nature, 530(7590), 2016, pp. 327-330.]Search in Google Scholar
[111. Rappaport, R. A. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1999.10.1017/CBO9780511814686]Search in Google Scholar
[112. Ratner, K. G., Amodio, D. M. Seeing ‘Us’ vs. ‘Them’: Minimal Group Effects on the Neural Encoding of Faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 2013, pp. 298-301.10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.017]Search in Google Scholar
[113. Reichard, G. A. Navajo Religion. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[114. Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R. The Evolution of Human Eusociality. In. I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, F. K. Salter (eds.). Ethnic Conflict and Indoctrination: Altruism and Indoctrination in Evolutionary Perspective. Berghahn Books: New York, 1998, pp. 71-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[115. Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R. Culture is Part of Human Biology: Why the Superorganic Concept Serves the Human Sciences Badly. In. M. Goodman, A. S. Moffat (eds.). Probing Human Origins (American Academy of Arts and Science: Cambridge, MA, 2002. https://www.amacad.org/publications/monographs/biocomplexity.pdf, pp. 59-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[116. Robbins, M. M. Male-Male Interactions in Heterosexual and All-Male Wild Mountain Gorilla Groups. Ethology, 102(7), 2010, pp. 942-965.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01172.x]Search in Google Scholar
[117. Ronquillo, J. et al. The Effects of Skin Tone on Race-Related Amygdala Activity: An fMRI Investigation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2007. doi:10.1093/scan/ns1043.]Search in Google Scholar
[118. Ross, C. T., Hooper, P. L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. Data on the Frequency of Non-Reproductive Adults in a Cross-Cultural Sample of Small-Scale Human Societies. bioRxiv, 2015. doi:10.1101/032318. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/11/20/032318.full.pdf+html.]Search in Google Scholar
[119. Ryan, C., Jetha, C. Sex at Dawn: How We Mate, Why We Stray, and What It Means for Modern Relationships. Harper: New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[120. Sanderson, S. K. The Evolution of Religious Behavior in its Socioecological Contexts. In J. R. Feierman (ed.). The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion. Praeger/ABC-CLIO: Santa Barbara, CA, 2009, pp. 3-19. ]Search in Google Scholar
[121. Schmitt, D. P., Fuller, R. C. On the Varieties of Sexual Experience: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of the Link between Religiosity and Human Mating Strategies. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10/1037/re10000036.]Search in Google Scholar
[122. Schreiber, D., Iacoboni, M. Huxtables on the Brain: An fMRI Study of Race and Norm Violation. Political Psychology, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00879x.]Search in Google Scholar
[123. Schwartz, R. M. The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[124. Seewald, P., Benedict XVI, P. Light of the World: The Pope, The Church, and the Signs of the Times. Ignatius Press: San Francisco, CA, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[125. Selin, G. Priestly Celibacy: Theological Foundations. The Catholic University of American Press: Washington, D. C., 2016.10.2307/j.ctt1bpmbbd]Search in Google Scholar
[126. Sherman, P. W., Jarvis, J. U. M., Alexander, R. D. (eds.). The Biology of the Naked Mole Rat. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[127. Shkurko, A. V. Is Social Categorization Based on Relational Ingroup/Outgroup Opposition? A Meta-Analysis. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 8(8), 2012, pp. 870-877.10.1093/scan/nss085383155422847948]Search in Google Scholar
[128. Smuts, B. B. et al. (eds.). Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[129. Taub, D. M. The Functions of Primate Paternalism: A Cross-Species Review. In. J. R. Feierman (ed.). Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions. New York: Springer, 1990, pp. 338-377.]Search in Google Scholar
[130. Taylor, C. A Secular Age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[131. ter Borg, M. B., van Henten, J. W. Religion as a Social and Spiritual Force. Fordham University Press: New York, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[132. Tinbergen, N. The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1951.]Search in Google Scholar
[133. Toi, M., Batson, C. D. More Evidence that Empathy is a Source of Altruistic Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 1982, pp. 281-292.10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.281]Search in Google Scholar
[134. Trivers, R. L. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 1971, pp. 35-57.10.1086/406755]Search in Google Scholar
[135. Uller, T., Helantera, H. Towards an Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Cooperation? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 48, 2014, pp. 267-271.10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[136. Van Cappellen et al.. Effects of Oxytocin Administration on Spirituality and Emotional Response to Meditation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 11(10), 2016, pp. 1579-1587.10.1093/scan/nsw078504091927317929]Search in Google Scholar
[137. Van Lange P. A. M. Does Empathy Trigger Only Altruistic Motivation? How About Selflessness or Justice? Emotion, 8(6), 2008, pp. 766-774.10.1037/a001396719102587]Search in Google Scholar
[138. Voland, E., Schiefenhövel, W. (eds.). The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior. Springer: Berlin, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4]Search in Google Scholar
[139. Walker, R. S. et al. Evolutionary History of Hunter-Gather Marriages Practices. PLOS ONE, 6(4), 2011. e19066. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019066.]Search in Google Scholar
[140. Wallen, K., Baum, M. J. Masculinization and Defeminization in Altrical and Precocial Mammals: Comparative Aspects of Steroid Hormone Action. Hormone, Brain and Behavior, 4, 2002, pp. 385-423.10.1016/B978-012532104-4/50071-8]Search in Google Scholar
[141. Whitehouse, H. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. AltaMira Press: Lanham, MD, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[142. Wightman, G. J. The Origins of Religion in the Paeleolithic. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[143. Wilder, J. A., Mobasher, Z., Hammer, M. F. Genetic Evidence for Unequal Population Size of Human Males and Females. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21(11), 2004, pp. 2047-2057.10.1093/molbev/msh21415317874]Search in Google Scholar
[144. Wilson, D. S. Does Altruism Exist? Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others. Yale University Press: Newhaven, 2016. ]Search in Google Scholar
[145. Wilson, E. O. The Insect Societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1971.]Search in Google Scholar
[146. Wilson, E. O. The Social Conquest of the Earth. Liveright Publishing Corporation/W. W. Norton & Company: New York, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[147. Wilson, J., Musick, M. Who Cares? Towards an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work. American Sociological Review, 62, 1997, pp. 694-713.10.2307/2657355]Search in Google Scholar
[148. Wright, R. The Evolution of God. Little, Brown and Company: New York, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[149. Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N. Parochial Altruism: Does it Explain Modern Human Group Psychology. Current Opinions in Psychology, 7, 2016, pp. 39-43.10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.015]Search in Google Scholar
[150. Young, A. J. The Causes of Physiological Suppression in Vertebrate Societies: A Synthesis. In R. Hager, C. B. Jones (eds.). op. cit. 2009, pp. 397-446.10.1017/CBO9780511641954.016]Search in Google Scholar