[Aberbach, J. D. and T. Christensen. 2014. “Why Reforms So Often Disappoint.” American Review of Public Administration 44(1), 3 – 16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barzley, M. and R. Gallego. 2010. “The Comparative Historical Analysis of Public Management Policy Cycles in France, Italy, and Spain: Symposium Conclusion.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 23(2), 297 – 307.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezes, P. and S. Parrado. 2013. “Trajectories of Administrative Reform: Institutions, Timing and Choices in France and Spain.” West European Politics 36(1), 22 – 50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blatter, J. and M. Haverland. 2014. “Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing.” In I. Engeli and C. Rothmayr (eds). Comparative Policy Studies: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. Houndsmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 59 – 84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, G., V. Nakrošis and J. Nemec. 2011. “Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results.” NISPACEE Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4(1), 9 – 29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovens, M., P. ’t Hart and B. G. Peters. 2001. Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781843762850]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen, P. M. and M. B. Klitgaard. 2010. “Behind the Veil of Vagueness: Success and Failure in Institutional Reforms.” Journal of Public Policy 30(2), 183 – 200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cierco, T. 2013. “Public Administration Reform in Macedonia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 46, 481 – 491.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dan, S. and C. Pollitt. 2014. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review. Online first, open-access version.10.1080/14719037.2014.908662]Search in Google Scholar
[Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. 2012. Progress on the Implementation of the Government’s Public Service Reform Plan. September. Available at http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Statement-on-Public-Service-Reform-Plan-6th-Sept-2012.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunn, W. N., K. Staronova and S. Pushkarev. 2006. “Implementation: The Missing Link.” In W. N. Dunn, K. Staronova and S. Pushkarev (eds). Implementation: The Missing Link in Public Administration Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 13 – 25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Epstein, R. A. and W. Jacoby. 2014. “Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East-West Divide?” Journal of Common Market Studies 52(1), 1 – 16.]Search in Google Scholar
[EUPAN. 2013. Discussion Note on Sustainable Reform within Public Administration: Responses from EUPAN members. Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. Available at http://www.eupan.eu/files/repository/20130327182412_Reform_Delivery_-_Discussion_Note.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammerschmid, G., A. Oprisor and V. Štimac. 2013. COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe: Research Report. Available at http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/COCOPS-WP3-Research-Report.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, B. D. and F. R. Baumgartner. 2012. “From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing.” Policy Studies Journal 40(1), 1 – 20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kay, A. and P. Baker. 2015. “What Can Causal Process Tracing Offer to Policy Studies? A Review of the Literature.” The Policy Studies Journal 43(1), 1 – 21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kickert W., T. Randma-Liiv and R. Savi. 2013. Fiscal consolidation in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. COCOPS deliverable 7.2, September. Available at http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/WP7-trend-report_final.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovač, P. 2014. “Evaluation of Agencification within Public Administration Reform: Case Study of Slovenia.” Paper for the EGPA 2014 conference (Speyer, Germany).]Search in Google Scholar
[Meier, K. J. and L. J. O’Toole Jr. 2012. “Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1 – 27 (first published online).]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. 2012. Civil Service Professionalisation in the Western Balkans. SIGMA Paper: 48, GOV/SIGMA: (2012)1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. 2009. Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after EU Accession. SIGMA Paper: 44, GOV/SIGMA: (2009)1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakrošis, V., R. Vilpišauskas and V. Kuokštis. 2015. “Fiscal Consolidation and Structural Reforms in Lithuania in the Period 2008 – 2012: From Grand Ambitions to Hectic Fire-Fighting.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(3). (accepted for publication).10.1177/0020852315581786]Search in Google Scholar
[Neshkova, M. I. and T. Kostadinova. 2012. “The Effectiveness of Administrative Reform in New Democracies.” Public Administration Review 72(3): 324 – 333. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02483.x.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02483.x]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2010. Making Reform Happen: Lessons From OECD Countries. Place: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/site/sgemrh/46159078.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, C. 2009. “Structural Change and Public Service Performance: International Lessons?” Public Money and Management 29(5), 285 – 291.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabatier, P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In P. A. Sabatier (ed.). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 117 – 166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savage, L. 2013. “Party System Polarisation and Government Duration in Central and Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 36(5), 1029 – 1051.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schimmelfennig, F. and U. Sedelmeier (eds). 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spendzharova, A. B. and M. A. Vachudova. 2012. “Catching Up? Consolidating Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after EU Accession.” West European Politics 35(1), 39 – 58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tompson W. 2009. The Political Economy of Reform: Lessons from Pensions, Product Markets and Labour Markets in Ten OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.10.1787/9789264073111-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Weaver, R. K. and B. A. Rockman (eds). 1993. Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weible, C. M., P. A. Sabatier, H. C. Jenkins-Smith, D. Nohrstedt, A.D. Henry and P. deLeon. 2011. “A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Policy Studies Journal 39(3), 349 – 360.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, J. (ed.). 1994. The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zubek, R. and H. Klüver. 2013. “Legislative Pledges and Coalition Government.” Party Politics 1(12) (published online before print).10.1177/1354068813487126]Search in Google Scholar