Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Materials Science-Poland
Édition 34 (2016): Edition 2 (June 2016)
Accès libre
Magnetic studies of 0.7(Fe
2
O
3
)/0.3(ZnO) nanocomposites in nanopowder form and dispersed in polymer matrix
Janusz Typek
Janusz Typek
,
Kamil Wardal
Kamil Wardal
,
Grzegorz Zolnierkiewicz
Grzegorz Zolnierkiewicz
,
Anna Szymczyk
Anna Szymczyk
,
Nikos Guskos
Nikos Guskos
,
Urszula Narkiewicz
Urszula Narkiewicz
et
Elzbieta Piesowicz
Elzbieta Piesowicz
| 24 mai 2016
Materials Science-Poland
Édition 34 (2016): Edition 2 (June 2016)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Research Article
Publié en ligne:
24 mai 2016
Pages:
286 - 296
Reçu:
20 mai 2015
Accepté:
11 janv. 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/msp-2016-0032
© 2016 Wroclaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
SEM (left) and TEM (right) images of 0.7(Fe2O3)/0.3(ZnO) nanopowder.
Fig. 2
Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility in ZFC and FC modes of 0.7(Fe2O3)/0.3(ZnO) nanopowder (a) and dispersed in polymer 0.7(Fe2O3)/0.3(ZnO) (b) measured in two different magnetic fields (100 Oe and 1000 Oe).
Fig. 3
Isothermal magnetization M(H) of nanopowder sample (a, b) and polymer sample (c, d). Solid line in (a) for T = 290 K is the fit to the modified Langevin function. (b) and (d) present magnetization in low magnetic fields (hysteresis loops).
Fig. 4
FMR spectra of 0.7(Fe2O3)/0.3(ZnO) nanopowder (a, b) and dispersed in polymer 0.7(Fe2O3)/0.3(ZnO) (c, d) recorded at a few different temperatures.
Fig. 5
Integrated intensity (left axis) of nanopowder (full squares) and polymer (full triangles) samples, and apparent resonance field (right axis) of nanopowder (open squares) and polymer (open triangles) samples.
Fig. 6
Experimental (dots) and fitted (line) FMR spectra, with two components of fitted line of 0.7(Fe2O3)/0.3(ZnO) nanocomposite at 15 K (a), 290 K (b) and the nanocomposite doped in the polymer PEN-b-PTMO at 17 K (c), 290 K (d).
Fig. 7
Temperature dependence of the calculated true resonance field of the nanopowder (full and open squares) and the polymer (full and open triangles) samples.
Fig. 8
Temperature dependence of the calculated true linewidth of the nanopowder (full and open squares) and the polymer (full and open triangles) samples.
Fig. 9
Temperature dependence of the effective anisotropy field Ha calculated from equation 3 for both types of samples.
Fig. 10
Heat flow of neat PEN-b-PTMO (full squares) and PEN-b-PTMO containing 0.1 % of the nanopowder (full triangles), mass loss of neat PEN-b-PTMO (open squares) and PEN-b-PTMO containing 0.1 % of the nanopowder (open triangles), in air (a) and in argon (b) atmosphere.