[AN, L., BROWN, D. G., NASSAUER, J. I., LOW, B. (2011): Variations in development of exurban residential landscapes: Timing, location, and driving forces. Journal of Land Use Science, 6(1): 13-32.10.1080/1747423X.2010.500686]Search in Google Scholar
[ANGILERI, V., TOCCOLINI, A. (1993): The assessment of visual quality as a tool for the conservation of rural landscape diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 24: 105-112.10.1016/0169-2046(93)90089-V]Search in Google Scholar
[ARENDT, D., BRABEC, E., DODSON, H. L., REID, C., YARO, R. D. (1994): Rural by Design: Maintaining Small Town Character. Washington, D.C.: APA Planners Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[ARRIAZA, M., CAÑAS-ORTEGA, J. F., CAÑAS-MADUEÑO, J. A., RUIZ-AVILES, P. (2004): Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 115-125.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029]Search in Google Scholar
[BANSKI, J., WESOLOWSKA, M. (2010): Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland’s Lublin region-influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94: 116-126.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[BERUBE, A., SINDER, A., WILSON, J. H. FREY, W. H. (2006): Finding exurbia: America’s fast-growing communities at the metropolitan fringe. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOURASSA, S. C. (1988): Toward a Theory of Landscape Aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15: 241-252.10.1016/0169-2046(88)90048-5]Search in Google Scholar
[BOURASSA, S. C. (1990): A Paradigm for Landscape Aesthetics. Environment and Behavior, 22: 787-812.10.1177/0013916590226004]Search in Google Scholar
[BRABEC, E. (2001): An evaluation of the effectiveness of cluster development in the town of Southampton, New York. Urban Ecosystems, 5(1): 27-47.10.1023/A:1021825601746]Search in Google Scholar
[BRUSH, R., CHENOWETH, R. E., BARMAN, T. (2000): Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47(1): 39-45.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00073-0]Search in Google Scholar
[BULUT, Z., YILMAZ, H. (2009): Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154: 459-468.10.1007/s10661-008-0412-518584297]Search in Google Scholar
[CARRUTHERS, J. I., VIAS, A. C. (2005): Urban, Suburban, and Exurban Sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West: Evidence from Regional Adjustment Models. Journal of Regional Science, 45(1): 21-48.10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00363.x]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMPION, A. G. (1998): Studying counter-urbanization and the rural population turnaround. In: Boyle, P. and Halfacree, K. [eds.]: Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues (pp. 21-40). Sussex, John Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[CLAY, G. R., DANIEL, T. C. (2000): Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49: 1-13.10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00055-4]Search in Google Scholar
[CLAY, G. R., SMIDT, R. K. (2004): Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66: 239-255.10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00114-2]Search in Google Scholar
[COETERIER, J. F. (1996): Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34: 27-44.10.1016/0169-2046(95)00204-9]Search in Google Scholar
[COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2000): European Landscape Convention. Florence, Italy.]Search in Google Scholar
[DANIEL, T. C. (2001): Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 267-281.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4]Search in Google Scholar
[DE VAL DE LA FUENTE, G., ATAURI, A., DE LUCIO, J. C. (2006): Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: a test study in Mediterranean-climate landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77: 393-407.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[DEARDEN, P. (1981): Consensus and the landscape quality continuum: a research note, Landscape Research, 6: 31.10.1080/01426398108705969]Search in Google Scholar
[DRAMSTAD, W. E., TVEIT, M. S., FJELLSTAD, W. J., FRY, G. L. A. (2006): Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 465-474.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006]Search in Google Scholar
[EBEN SALEH, M. A. (2001): Environmental cognition in the vernacular landscape: assessing the aesthetic quality of Al-Alkhalaf village, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Building and Environment, 36: 965-979.10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00038-X]Search in Google Scholar
[EWALD, K. C. (2001): The neglect of aesthetics in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 255-266.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00140-2]Search in Google Scholar
[FJELLSTAD, W. J., DRAMSTAD, W. E. (1999): Patterns of change in two contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 45: 177-191.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00055-9]Search in Google Scholar
[FLORIDA, R., MELLANDER, C., STOLARICK, K. (2011): Beautiful Places: The Role of Perceived Aesthetic Beauty in Community Satisfaction. Regional Studies, 45: 33-48.10.1080/00343404.2010.486784]Search in Google Scholar
[FOLEY, K., SCOTT, M. (2014): Accommodating new housing development in rural areas? Representations of landscape, land and rurality in Ireland. Landscape Research, 39(4): 359-386.10.1080/01426397.2012.723680]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANTÁL, B., MALÝ, J., OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., NEMEŠKAL, J. (2016): Distance matters. Assessing socioeconomic impacts of the Dukovany nuclear power plant in the Czech Republic: Local perceptions and statistical evidence. Moravian Geographical Records, 21: 2-13.10.2478/mgr-2013-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[FREDERICK, W. C. (2007): Nature and Business Ethics. In: Frederick, R. E. [ed.]: A Companion to Business Ethics (pp. 100-111). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.10.1002/9780470998397.ch9]Search in Google Scholar
[FYHRI, A., JACOBSEN, J. K. S., TØMMERVIK, H. (2009): Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian costal region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91: 202-211.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[GOSNELL, H., ABRAMS, J. (2011): Amenity migration: diverse conceptualization of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, 76: 303-322.10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4]Search in Google Scholar
[HÄGERHALL, C. M. (2001): Consensus in landscape preference judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology: 21: 83-92.10.1006/jevp.2000.0186]Search in Google Scholar
[HALLEUX, J. M., MARCINCZAK, S., VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2012): The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29(4): 887-898.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.008]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMMITT, W. E., PATTERSON, M. E., NOE, F. P. (1994): Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29: 171-183.10.1016/0169-2046(94)90026-4]Search in Google Scholar
[HART, J. F. (1995): Rural and “farm” no longer mean the same. In: Castle, E. N. [ed.]: The changing American countryside (pp. 63-76). Lawrence, University of Kansas.]Search in Google Scholar
[HART, J. F. (1998). The rural landscape. London: The John Hopkins University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOUFKOVÁ, P., BUMERL, J., POSPÍŠIL, L., KARLÍK, P., BENEŠ, J., BERNARDOVÁ, A., HRABALÍKOVÁ, M., JANEČKOVÁ MOLNÁROVÁ, K., HEJCMAN, M. (2015): Origin and development of long-strip field patterns: A case study of an abandoned medieval village in the Czech Republic. Catena, 135: 83-91.10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.017]Search in Google Scholar
[HOWLEY, P., HYNES, S., DONOGHUE, C. O. (2012): Countryside preferences: Exploring individuals' willingness to pay for the conservation of the traditional farm landscape. Landscape Research, 37(6): 703-719.10.1080/01426397.2011.637619]Search in Google Scholar
[HUNZIKER, M. (1995): The spontaneous reafforestation in abandoned agricultural lands: perception and aesthetic assessment by locals and tourists. Landscape and urban planning, 31(1): 399-410.10.1016/0169-2046(95)93251-J]Search in Google Scholar
[HURLEY, P. T., WALKER, P. A. (2004): Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A, 36(9): 1529-1547.10.1068/a36186]Search in Google Scholar
[IHATSU, E. (2005): The attractive village - enhancing character and image as sources of local wealth (pp. 201-203). The second international scientific conference: Rural development 2005, Proceedings 2. Kaunas, Lithuania.]Search in Google Scholar
[JESSEL, B. (2006): Elements, characteristics and character - Information functions of landscapes in terms of indicators. Ecological Indicators, 6: 153-167.10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.009]Search in Google Scholar
[JORGENSEN, A. (2011): Beyond the view: Future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100: 353-355.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.023]Search in Google Scholar
[KALIVODA, O., VOJAR, J., SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., ZAHRADNÍK, D. (2014): Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effect of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondent characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management 137: 36-44.10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]Search in Google Scholar
[KAPLAN, S., KAPLAN, R. (1982): Cognition and Environment, Functioning in an uncertain world. New York, Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[KAPLAN, A., TAŞKIN, T., ÖNENÇ, A. (2006): Assessing the visual quality of rural and urban-fringed landscapes surrounding livestock farms. Biosystems Engineering, 95(3): 437-448.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.07.011]Search in Google Scholar
[KATES, R. W. (1967): The pursuit of beauty in the environment. Landscape, 16: 21-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[KURDOGLU, O., KURDOGLU, B. C. (2010): Determining recreational, scenic, and historical-cultural potentials of landscape features along a segment of the ancient Silk Road using factor analyzing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170: 99-116.10.1007/s10661-009-1219-8]Search in Google Scholar
[KUREK, S., WÓJTOWICZ, M., GAŁKA, J. (2015): The changing role of migration and natural increase in suburban population growth: The case of a non-capital post-socialist city (The Krakow Metropolitan Area, Poland). Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(4): 59-70.10.1515/mgr-2015-0025]Search in Google Scholar
[LAGRO, J. A. (1994): Population growth beyond the urban fringe: implications for rural land use policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28(2): 143-158.10.1016/0169-2046(94)90004-3]Search in Google Scholar
[LAGRO JR, J. A. (1998): Landscape context of rural residential development in Southeastern Wisconsin (USA). Landscape Ecology, 13(2): 65-77.10.1023/A:1007943304840]Search in Google Scholar
[LAPPING, M., DANIELS, T., KELLER, J. (1989): Rural Planning and Development in the United States. New York, The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[LITWIN, U., PLUTA, M. (2015): Spatial planning in Poland in years 1928-2003. Review and research of Acts records. Geomatics, Land management and Landscape, 4: 61-67.10.15576/GLL/2015.4.61]Search in Google Scholar
[LOTHIAN, A. (1999): Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44: 177-198.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5]Search in Google Scholar
[LÖW, J., MÍCHAL, I. (2003): Krajinný ráz. Kostelec nad Černými Lesy, Lesnická práce.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAIER, K. (1998): Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies, 3(3): 351-365.10.1080/13563479808721719]Search in Google Scholar
[MARCOUILLER, D. W., LAPPING, M. B., FURUSETH, O. J. [eds.] (2011): Rural Housing, Exurbanization, and Amenity-driven Development: Contrasting the “Haves” and the “Have Nots”. Farnham, Ashgate Publishing.10.1080/07293682.2011.639284]Search in Google Scholar
[NASAR, J. L., KANG, J. (1999): House style preference and meanings across taste cultures. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(1): 33-42.10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00109-1]Search in Google Scholar
[NASSAUER, J. I. (1988): Landscape care: Perceptions of local people in landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape and Land Use Planning, 8: 27-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[NASSAUER, J. I. (1989): Agricultural policy and aesthetic objectives. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 44(5): 384-387.]Search in Google Scholar
[NASSAUER, J. I. (1995): Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 10(4): 229-237.10.1007/BF00129257]Search in Google Scholar
[NUGA, M., METSPALU, P., ORG, A., LEETMAA, K. (2015): Planning post-summurbia: From spontaneous pragmatism to collaborative planning? Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(4): 36-46.10.1515/mgr-2015-0023]Search in Google Scholar
[NUSSL, H., RINK, D. (2005): The production of urban sprawl in Eastern Germany as a phenomenon of postsocialist transformation. Cities, 22: 123-134.10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[ODE, Å., FRY, G.,TVEIT, M. S., MESSAGER P., MILLER, D. (2009): Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 375-383.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.01318280633]Search in Google Scholar
[PALMER, J. F. (2004): Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 201-218.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.010]Search in Google Scholar
[PALMER, J. F., HOFFMAN, R. E. (2001): Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 149-161.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5]Search in Google Scholar
[PÁNEK, J., TŮMA, O. (2009): A history of the Czech lands. Prague, Karolinum]Search in Google Scholar
[PELTAN, T. (2012): Suburbanizace a energetická náročnost dojížďky. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 15: 21-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[PURCELL, A. T., LAMB, R. J. (1984): Landscape perception: an examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area. Journal of Environmental Management, 19: 31-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[PURCELL, A. T., NASAR, J. L. (1992): Experiencing other people’s houses: a model of similarities and differences in environmental experience, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12: 199-211.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80135-5]Search in Google Scholar
[PYNNONEN, D., PROPST, D., VOGT, C., MCDONOUGH, M. (2005): Role of natural and cultural features in residents’ perceptions of rural character. In: Peden, J. G. and Schuster, R. M. [eds.]: Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania (pp. 32-38). USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.]Search in Google Scholar
[RECHTMAN, O. (2013): Visual perception of agricultural cultivated landscapes: Key components as predictors for landscape preferences. Landscape Research, 38(3): 273-294.10.1080/01426397.2012.672639]Search in Google Scholar
[ROGGE, E., NEVENS, F., GULNICK, H. (2007): Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82: 159-174.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006]Search in Google Scholar
[RYAN, R. L. (2002): Preserving rural character in New England: local residents’ perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61: 19-35.10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00066-X]Search in Google Scholar
[SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., BRABEC, E., KUMBLE, P., PITTNEROVA, B., PIXOVA, K., SALEK, M. (2009): Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agriculture, ecosystems, environment, 129(4): 465-473.10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.026]Search in Google Scholar
[SKLENICKA, P., JANOVSKA, V., SALEK, M., VLASAK, J., MOLNAROVA, K. (2014): The Farmland Rental Paradox: extreme land ownership fragmentation as a new form of land degradation. Land Use Policy, 38: 587-593.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.006]Search in Google Scholar
[SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K. (2010): Visual perception of habitats adopted for post-mining landscape rehabilitation. Environmental management, 46(3): 424-435.10.1007/s00267-010-9513-320556383]Search in Google Scholar
[SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., PIXOVA, K. C., SALEK, M. E. (2013): Factors affecting farmland prices in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 30(1): 130-136.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., KALIVODA, O., SKLENIČKA, P. (2014): Driving factors for visual landscape preferences in protected landscape areas. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 45: 36-43.10.7160/sab.2014.450105]Search in Google Scholar
[STAMPS, A. E. (1990): Use of photographs to stimulate environments. A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(33): 907-913.10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.907]Search in Google Scholar
[STAMPS, A. E. (1994): A study in scale and character: contextual effects on environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 42: 223-245.10.1006/jema.1994.1070]Search in Google Scholar
[STAMPS, A. E. (1997): Some streets of San Francisco: preference effects of trees, cars, wires, and buildings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24: 81-93.10.1068/b240081]Search in Google Scholar
[STAMPS, A. E., NASAR, J. L. (1997): Design review and public preferences: effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17: 11-32.10.1006/jevp.1996.0036]Search in Google Scholar
[STEWART, T. R., MIDDLETON, P., DOWNTON, M., ELY, D. (1984): Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4: 283-302.10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80001-8]Search in Google Scholar
[STRUMSE, E. (1994): Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14: 293-303.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80220-8]Search in Google Scholar
[SULLIVAN, W. C. (1994): Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29: 85-101.10.1016/0169-2046(94)90020-5]Search in Google Scholar
[SVOBODOVA, K., SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., VOJAR, J. (2014): Does the composition of landscape photographs affect visual preferences? The rule of the Golden Section and the position of the horizon. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38: 143-152.10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.005]Search in Google Scholar
[SVOBODOVA, K., SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., SALEK, M. (2012): Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43: 34-44.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007]Search in Google Scholar
[SWANWICK, C., LAND USE CONSULTANTS (2002): Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland. Cheltenham, The Countryside Agency and Edinburgh: Scottish Natural Heritage.]Search in Google Scholar
[SWANWICK, C. (2009): Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy, 26: 62-75.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠPULEROVÁ, J., DOBROVODSKÁ, M., IZAKOVIČOVÁ, Z., KENDERESSY, P., ŠTEFUNKOVÁ, D., PETROVIČ, F. (2013): Developing a strategy for the protection of traditional agricultural landscapes based on a complex landscape-ecological evaluation (the case of a mountain landscape in Slovakia). Moravian Geographical Reports, 21(4): 15-26.10.2478/mgr-2013-0017]Search in Google Scholar
[TAYLOR, L. (2011): No boundaries: exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal, 76: 323-339.10.1007/s10708-009-9300-y]Search in Google Scholar
[TILT, J. H., KEARNEY, A. R., BRADLEY, G. (2007): Understanding rural character: cognitive and visual perceptions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81: 14-26.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.007]Search in Google Scholar
[THORBECK, D. (2012): Rural Design. A New Design Discipline. New York, Routledge.10.4324/9780203162545]Search in Google Scholar
[TVEIT, M. S., ODE, Å., FRY, G. (2006): Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31(3): 229-255.10.1080/01426390600783269]Search in Google Scholar
[TVEIT, M. S. (2009): Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2882-2888.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.02118951696]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (1995): Landscape Aesthetics, a Handbook for Scenery Management. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2004): Measuring rurality: rural-urban continuum codes, Washington, D.C.: Economic research service, USDA.]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN DEN BERG, A. E., KOOLE, S. L. (2006): New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 362-372.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[VOREL, I., BUKÁČEK, R., MATĚJKA, P., CULEK, M., SKLENIČKA, P. (2003): A method for assessing the visual impact on landscape character of proposed construction, activities or changes in land use. Prague, Nakladatelství Naděžda Skleničková.]Search in Google Scholar
[WALKER, P., FORTMANN, L. (2003): Whose landscape? A political ecology of the ‘exurban’ Sierra. Cultural Geographies, 10(4): 469-491.10.1191/1474474003eu285oa]Search in Google Scholar
[WALKER, A. J., RYAN, R. L. (2008): Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: a Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86: 141-152.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[ZABIK, M. J., PRYTHERCH, D. L. (2013): Challenges to planning for rural character: A case study from exurban southern New England. Cities, 31: 186-196.10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.009]Search in Google Scholar