[[1] E. Brill, A simple rule-based part of speech tagger, In Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, HLT’91, pp. 112-116, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 199210.3115/1075527.1075553]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] C. D. Manning and H. Sch¨utze, Foundations of statistical natural language processing, MIT press, 1999]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3-55, 200110.1145/584091.584093]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] N. Chomsky, Three models for the description of language, Information Theory, IRE Transactions on, vol. 2, no. 3, pp.113-124, 195610.1109/TIT.1956.1056813]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] W. A. Gale, K. W. Church, and D. Yarowsky, Work on statistical methods for word sense disambiguation, In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, vol. 54, p. 60. 1992]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] J. Kupiec, Robust part-of-speech tagging using a hidden markov model, Computer Speech & Language, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 225 - 242, 199210.1016/0885-2308(92)90019-Z]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] H. Schmid, Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees, in Proceedings of the international conference on new methods in language processing, vol. 12, pp. 44-49. Citeseer, 1994]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] A. Ratnaparkhi et al, A maximum entropy model for part-of-speech tagging, in Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, vol. 1, pp. 133-142. Philadelphia, USA, 1996]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] P. F. Brown, V. J. D. Pietra, S. A. D. Pietra, and R. L. Mercer, The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation, Computational linguistics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 263-311, 1993]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] H. Hotta, M. Kittaka, and M. Hagiwara,Word vectorization using relations among words for neural network, IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, vol. 130, pp. 75-82, 201010.1541/ieejeiss.130.75]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] G. Tsatsaronis, I. Varlamis, and M. Vazirgiannis, Text relatedness based on a word thesaurus, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-40, 201010.1613/jair.2880]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] G. Tsatsaronis, I. Varlamis, and M. Vazirgiannis, Word sense disambiguation with semantic networks, In Text, Speech and Dialogue, pp. 219-226. Springer, 200810.1007/978-3-540-87391-4_29]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] R. Collobert, J. Weston, L. Bottou, M. Karlen, K. Kavukcuoglu, and P. Kuksa, Natural language processing (almost) from scratch, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2493-2537, 2011]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] T. Sagara and M. Hagiwara, Natural language neural network and its application to questionanswering system, Neurocomputing, vol. 142, pp. 201 - 208, 201410.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.048]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] L. Dong, F. Wei, M. Zhou, and K. Xu, Question answering over Freebase with multi-column convolutional neural networks, in Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 260-269. Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China, July 201510.3115/v1/P15-1026]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate, CoRR, vol. abs/1409.0473, 2014]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping, Psychological Review, vol. 104, no. 3, p. 427, 199710.1037/0033-295X.104.3.427]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, A symbolicconnectionist theory of relational inference and generalization, Psychological review, vol. 110, no. 2, p. 220, 200310.1037/0033-295X.110.2.220]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, Relational reasoning in a neurally plausible cognitive architecture an overview of the LISA project, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 153-157, 200510.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00350.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] M. Saito and M. Hagiwara, Natural language processing neural network for analogical inference, In The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp.1-7, 201010.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596742]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] T. Kudo and H. Kazawa, Web Japanese N-gram version 1, Gengo Shigen Kyokai, vol. 14, 2007]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] M. Fukuda, S. Nobesawa, and I. Tahara, Knowledge representation for query-answer, In Forum on Information Technology, vol. 3, pp. 233-236, Information Processing Society of Japan, 2004]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] S. Ikehara, M. Miyazaki, S. Shirai, A. Yokoo, H. Nakaiwa, K. Ogura, Y. Ooyama, and Y. Hayashi, GoiTaikei-A Japanese Lexicon, Iwanami Shoten, 1997]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] T. Kudo, K. Yamamoto, and Y. Matsumoto, Applying conditional random fields to Japanese morphological analysis, in Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 2004, pp. 230-237. 2004]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] G. A. Miller, WordNet: a lexical database for english, Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 39-41, 199510.1145/219717.219748]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] G. Miller and C. Fellbaum, WordNet: An electronic lexical database, 199810.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] M. P. Marcus, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini, Building a large annotated corpus of english: The Penn Treebank, Comput. Linguist., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 313-330, June 199310.21236/ADA273556]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] M. Marcus, G. Kim, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, R. MacIntyre, A. Bies, M. Ferguson, K. Katz, and B. Schasberger, The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, HLT ’94, pp. 114-119, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 199410.3115/1075812.1075835]Search in Google Scholar
[[29] P. K. Martha and M. Palmer, From Treebank to Propbank, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2002, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 2002]Search in Google Scholar
[[30] P. Kingsbury, M. Palmer, and M. Marcus, Adding semantic annotation to the penn treebank, in Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, pp. 252-256, Citeseer, 2002]Search in Google Scholar
[[31] M. Palmer, D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury, The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles, Comput. Linguist., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71-106, March 200510.1162/0891201053630264]Search in Google Scholar
[[32] P. E.Woodford, The test of english for international communication (TOEIC), 1980]Search in Google Scholar
[[33] National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST TREC Document Database: Disk 4, Retrieved June 25, 2016, from http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd22.cfm]Search in Google Scholar
[[34] National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST TREC Document Database: Disk 5, Retrieved June 25, 2016, from http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd23.cfm]Search in Google Scholar
[[35] E. M. Voorhees et al. The TREC-8 question answering track report, in Proceedings of the 8th Text Retreval Conference, vol. 99, pp.77-82. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999]Search in Google Scholar
[[36] L. Loungheed, Longman preparation series for the new TOEIC test: More practice tests, 2006]Search in Google Scholar
[[37] T. S. Committee et al., TOEIC program data & analysis, 2014]Search in Google Scholar
[[38] E. T. Service, Examinee handbook listening & reading, 2008]Search in Google Scholar