[Adams, D. (2004). Usable knowledge in public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 63(1): 29-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adler, E. and Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization 46(1): 367-390.]Search in Google Scholar
[Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In: W. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, (pp. 205-224), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Atkinson, M. and Coleman, W. (1989) Strong states and weak states: sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. British Journal of Political Science 19(1): 46-67.10.1017/S0007123400005317]Search in Google Scholar
[Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policymakers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3(4): 24-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bader, V. (2014). Sciences, politics, and associative democracy: democratizing science and expertising democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 27(4): 420-441.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badger, D., Nursten, J., Williams, P. and Woodward, M. (2000). Should all literature reviews be systematic? Evaluation and Research in Education 14(3/4): 220-230.10.1080/09500790008666974]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy sciences 25(3): 275-294.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biegelbauer, P. (2007). Learning from abroad: the Austrian competence centre programme Kplus. Science and Public Policy, 34(9), 606-618.10.3152/030234207X264926]Search in Google Scholar
[Biegelbauer, P. (2013). Wie lernt die Politik?: Lernen aus Erfahrung in Politik und Verwaltung. Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bielak, A. T., Campbell, A., Pope, S., Schaefer, K. and Shaxson, L. (2008). From science communication to knowledge brokering: the shift from “science push” to “policy pull.” In: D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices (pp. 201-226), Amsterdam: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boswell, Ch. (2009). The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge. Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581120]Search in Google Scholar
[Brand, U. and Vadrot, A. B. M. (2013). Epistemic selectivities and the valorisation of nature: the cases of the Nagoya Protocol and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Law, Environment and Development Journal 9(2): 202-220.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cabinet Office (1999a). Modernizing Government: Green Paper. London: Stationary Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cabinet Office (1999b). Professional Policy Making for 21st Century. London: Stationary Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, D. T. (1991). Methods for Experimenting Society. American Journal of Evaluation 12(3): 223-260.]Search in Google Scholar
[Canary, H. (2010). Constructing policy knowledge: contradictions, communication, and knowledge frames. Communication Monographs 77(2): 181-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist 22(3): 459-470.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carden, F. (2005). Making the Most of Research: The Influence of IDRC-supported Research on Policy Processes. Paper for the international conference African Economic Research Institutions and Policy Development: Opportunities and Challenges, Dakar, 28-29 January 2005. URL: http://www.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/11085518871Making_the_Most_of_Research.pdf ]Search in Google Scholar
[Cash, D W., Clark, W C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N M., Eckley, N., Guston, D H., Jaeger, J. and Mitchell, R B. (2003). Knowledge Systems for sustainable development. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14): 8086-8091.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, R. and Holmes, J. (2010). Improving input from research to environmental policy: challenges of structure and culture. Science and Public Policy 37(10): 751-764.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M, Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M. and McNie, E. (2011). Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). PNAS www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0900231108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, D. K. and Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Solving problems of bureaucracy: limits on social science. In: C. H. Weiss and A. H. Barton (Eds.), Making Bureaucracies Work (pp. 125-138), Beverly Hills: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Colebatch, H. K. (2006). What work makes policy? Policy Science 39: 309-321.10.1007/s11077-006-9025-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Coleman, W. and Skogstad, G. (1990) Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Ontario: Copp Clark Pitman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coleman, W. and Skogstad, G. (1990). Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Ontario: Copp Clark Pitman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins, H. M. and Pinch, T. J. (1982). Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4): 381-400.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortner, H. J. (2000). Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy 3: 21-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies P. (2004). Is Evidence-Based Government Possible? Jerry Lee Lecture 2004, presented to the Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC, 19 February 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, H, Nutley, S. M. and Walter, I. (2005). Assessing the Impact of Social Science Research: Conceptual, Methodological and Practical Issues. A background discussion paper for ESRC Symposium on Assessing Non-Academic Impact of Research. St Andrews: University of St Andrews, Research Unit for Research Utilisation. URL: http://www.odi.org.uk/rapid/Meetings/ESRC/Index.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, H., Nutley, S. and Walter, I. (2008). Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 13(3): 188-190.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, H., Nutley, S. M. and Smith, P. C. (2000). Introducing evidence-based policy and practice in public services. In: H. Davies, S. M. Nutley and P.C. Smith (Eds.), What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services (pp. 1-12), Bristol: The Policy Press. de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobbins, M., Robeson, P., Ciliska, D., Hanna, S., Cameron, R., O’Mara, L., DeCorby, K. and Mercer, S. (2009). A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implementation Science 4(23).10.1186/1748-5908-4-23]Search in Google Scholar
[Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996). “Who learns what from whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature,” Political Studies, 44, 343-57.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance 13 (1): 5-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donaldson, S. I., Christie, C. A. and Mark, M. M. (2009). What counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice? London: Sage.10.4135/9781412995634]Search in Google Scholar
[Dror, Y. (1979). Think tanks: a new invention in government. In: Weiss, C. H. and Barton, A. H. (Eds.), Making Bureaucracies Work (pp. 139-152), Beverly Hills: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estabrooks, C. (1999). The conceptual structure of research utilization. Research in Nursing & Health 22(3): 203-216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Etzioni, A. (1968). The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York, NY: The Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2001). European Governance: A White Paper. COM(2001) 428 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2008). Scientific Evidence for Policy-making. EUR 22982 EN. Brussels: DG Research, Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ssh/docs/20080619en.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eyestone, R. (1977) Confusion, diffusion and innovation. American Political Science Review 71: 441-447.10.1017/S0003055400267361]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newsbury Park: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, F. and J. Forester (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810503]Search in Google Scholar
[Foucault, M. (1978). Governmentality. In: P. Rabinow and N. Rose (Eds.), (2003) The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 229-245), New York: The New Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, R. (2006). Learning in public policy. In: M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367-388]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, R. and Sturdy, S. (2014). Introduction: knowledge in policy - embodied, inscribed, enacted. In: R. Freeman and S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in Policy: Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabbay J. and le May, A. C. (2004). Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines”? Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 329: 1013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from nonscience: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781-795.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glasbergen, P. (1996). “Learning to manage the environment,” Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects, 175-193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glaser, G. and Bates, P. (2011). Enhancing Science-Policy Links for Global Sustainability. Report for the Stakeholder Forum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, J. A. M. (1997). Evidence-based healthcare: How to make health policy and management decisions. New York: Churchill Livingstone.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organisations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26(4): 399-408.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, P. M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization 43(3): 377-403 10.1017/S0020818300032975]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, P. M. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46: 1-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haddow, G. and Klobas, E. (2004). Communication of research to practice in library and information science: closing the gap. Library & Information Science Research 26: 29-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajer, M. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajer, M. and Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In: M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251-268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, P. A. (1993). “Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy-making in Britain,” Comparative Polics 25: 275-296.10.2307/422246]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, P. A. (ed.) (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221380]Search in Google Scholar
[Havelock, R. (1969). Planning for Innovation through the Dissemination and Utilization of Scientific Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK, Institute for Social Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Head, B. W. (2010). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: key issues and challenges. Policy and Society 29: 77-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Healey, P. (2007). Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social policies in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heclo, Hugh. (1974). Modern Social Policy in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven.]Search in Google Scholar
[Higging, P. T. and Green, S. (Eds.), (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holmes, J. and Lock, J. (2010). Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management. Marine Policy 34: 29-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’. Science and Public Policy 26(3): 201-210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoppe, R. (2005). Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis 3(3): 199-215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoppe, R. (2009). Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work. Poiesis and Praxis 6: 235-263.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A. and Cairns, R. (2013). Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4(4): 283-300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, M., Kroehler, C. J. and Vander, J. W. (2002). Sociology: The Core. New York: McGraw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers. Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasanoff, S. (1996) Science and norms in global environmental regimes. In: F. Osler Hampson and J. Reppy (Eds.): Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice, (pp. 173-197), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasanoff, S. (1997). Social Learning in the Risk Society. Committee for the Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasanoff, S. (Ed.) (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998). Science and decision-making. In: S. Rayner and E. Malone (Eds.): Human choice and climate change: an international assessment. Vol. 1: The Societal Framework (pp. 1-112), Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and P. A. Sabatier (1993). “The dynamics of policy-oriented learning,” In: Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and P. A. Sabatier (Eds.) Policy Change and Learning: The Advocacy Coalition Framework. Pp. 41-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Penn State University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, A. C. (2009). Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Advice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262013123.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins College.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knorr-Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32(4): 361-375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knott, J. and Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1(4): 537-578.10.1177/107554708000100404]Search in Google Scholar
[Kothari, A., MacLean, L. and Edwards, N. (2009). Increasing capacity for knowledge translation: understanding how some researchers engage policy-makers. Evidence and Policy 5(1): 33-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lahsen, M. (2004). Transnational locals: Brazilian experiences of the climate regime. In: S. Jasanoff and M. L. Martello (eds.): Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, (pp. 151-172), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: drawing things together. In H. Kuklick and E. Long (eds.): Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6: 1-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latour, B. (1988). Mixing humans and non-humans together: the sociology of a doorcloser. Social Problems 35(3): 298-310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355]Search in Google Scholar
[Likens, G. E. (2010). The role of science in decision making: does evidence-based science drive environmental policy? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8(6): e1-e9.10.1890/090132]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review 19(2): 79-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. Macmillan: London.]Search in Google Scholar
[May, P. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy 12(4): 331-354.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, M. (2010). The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication 32(1): 118-127.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, M. and Molyneux-Hodgson, S. (2010). Introduction: the dynamics of epistemic communities. Sociological Research Online 15(2): 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michaels, S. (2009). Matching knowledge brokerage strategies to environmental problems and settings. Environmental Science and Policy 12: 994-1011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikulskiene, B. (2013). Research-based Knowledge for Policy Decision Making: Maximizing the Opportunities of Impact. European Integration Studies 7: 35-41. Miller, C. A. (2004). Climate science and the making of a global political order. In: Jasanoff, S. (ed.): States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Montpetit, E. (2007) Policy Learning in the Midst of Controversy: A Comparative Survey of Biotechnology Policy Actors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nassehi, A., von der Hagen-Demszky, A. and Mayr, K. (2007). The Structures of Knowledge and of Knowledge Production. Literature Review and Theoretical Framework Report (Part 8). Know & Pol project. URL: http://knowandpol.eu/IMG/pdf/lr.tr.nassehi_al.eng.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (2003). Introduction: Toward a Practice-Based View of Knowing and Learning in Organizations. In: D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi and D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach (pp. 3-31), Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowotny H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41: 179-194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nutley, S. M. and Webb, J. (2000). Evidence and the policy process. In: H. Davies, S. M. Nutley and P.C. Smith (Eds.), What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services (pp. 13-41), Bristol: The Policy Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nutley, S. M., Walter, I. and Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oldham, G. and McLean, R. (1997). Approaches to Knowledge-Brokering. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Winnipeg: IISD. URL: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2001/networks_knowledge_brokering.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Ottoson, J. M. (2009). Knowledge-for-action theories in evaluation: knowledge utilization, diffusion, implementation, transfer, and translation. New Directions for Evaluation 124 (Winter): 7-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owens, S., Petts, J. and Bulkeley, H. (2006). Boundary work: knowledge, policy, and the urban environment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24: 633-643.]Search in Google Scholar
[Page, E. C. and Wright, V. (2007). Introduction: from the active to the enabling state. In: Page, E. C. & Wright, V. (Eds.), From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations (pp. 1-14), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parsons, W. (2002). “From Muddling Through to Muddling Up - Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernization of the British Government. Public Policy and Administration 17 (3): 43-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration 63(1): 43-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy. A Realistic Perspective. London: Sage Petts J. and Brooks, C. (2006) Expert conceptualisations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decisionmaking: challenges for deliberative democracy. Environment and Planning A 38: 1045-1059.10.4135/9781849209120]Search in Google Scholar
[Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pons, X., and van Zanten, A. (2007). Knowledge Circulation, Regulation and Governance. Literature Review and Theoretical Framework Report (Part 6). Know & Pol project. URL: http://knowandpol.eu/IMG/pdf/lr.tr.pons_vanzanten.eng.pdf ]Search in Google Scholar
[Pregernig, M. (2004). Linking knowledge and action: the role of science in NFP processes. In: P. Glück and J. Voitleithner (Eds.), NFP Research: Its Retrospect and Outlook (pp. 195-215), Vienna: Institute for Forest Sector Policy and Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reckwitz, A. (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken: Eine sozialtheoretische Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32(4): 282-301.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rice, J. L., Burke, B. J. and Heynen, N. (2015). Knowing climate change, embodying climate praxis: experiential knowledge in Southern Appalachia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105(2): 1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, R. (1991). “What is lesson-drawing?” Journal of Public Policy, 11, (1), 3-30.10.1017/S0143814X00004918]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy. A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space, Chatham NJ: Chatham House Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenberg, W. and Donald, A. (1995). Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ 310(6987): 1122-1126.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rutherford, P. (1999). The entry of life into history. In: É. Darier (Ed.), Discourses of the Environment, (pp. 37-62), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabatier, P. A. 1988. Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change an advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication 8(4): 649-692.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabatier, P. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment, In: Sabatier, P. (Ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sager, F. (2007). Making transport policy work: polity, policy, politics and systematic review. Policy & Politics, 35(2), 269-288.10.1332/030557307780712951]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanderson, I. (2000). Evaluation in Complex Policy Systems. Evaluation 6(4): 433-454.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schatzki T. R. (2012). A primer on practices. In: J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings and F. Trede (Eds.): Practice-based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, (pp. 13-26) Rotterdam: Sense.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schön, D. A. and Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shanley, P. and López, C. (2009). Out of the loop: why research rarely reaches policy makers and the public and what can be done. Biotropica 41(5): 535-544.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sherman, L. W. and Strang, H. (2007). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. London: Smith Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shulock, N. (1999). The Paradox of policy analysis: if it is not used, why do we produce so much of it? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18(2): 226-244.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<226::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-J]Search in Google Scholar
[Sidney, M. S. (2007). Policy formulation: design and tools. In: F. Fischer, G. J. Miller and M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (pp. 79-87), Boca Raton: CRC Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, A. F. (1996). Mad cows and ecstasy: chance and choice in an evidence-based society. Royal Statistical Society Series, 159, 367-384.Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387-420. Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy 40(2): 237-255.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stone, D. (1997). Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: Norton & Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stone, D. (2001). Learning Lessons, Policy Transfer and the International Diffusion of Policy Ideas. CSGR Working Paper No. 69/01.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stone, D. (2002). Using knowledge: the dilemmas of “bridging research and policy”. Compare 32(3): 285-296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Task Force (1996). Connecting with the World: Priorities for Canadian Internationalism in the 21st Century. Report of a Task Force led by Maurice F. Strong, tasked the IDRC, IISD and NSI. Ottawa. URL: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/14538/1/105111_e.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Tingling, P. M. and Brydon, M. J. (2010). Is decision-based evidence making necessarily bad? MIT Sloan Management Review 51(4): 70-76. van den Hove, S. (2007). A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures 39: 807-826.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagenaar, H. (2004). ‘Knowing’ the rules: administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review 6: 643-655.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagenaar, H. (2007). Interpretation and intention in policy analysis. In: Fischer, F., Miller, G. J., and Sidney, M. S. (eds.) Handbook of Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 429-441.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, V., House, A. and Hamer, S. (2009). Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence and Policy 5(3): 267-279.10.1332/174426409X463811]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, M. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. In H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert‐based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Weingart, P. (2001). Die Stunde der Wahrheit: Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft. Weilerswilst: Velbrück Wissenschaft.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. (1977). “Research for Policy’s Sake: The Enlightenment Function of Social Science Research”. Policy Analysis, 3 (4): 531-545.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of knowledge utilization. Public Administration Review 39 (September/October): 426-431.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1(3): 381-404.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. H. (1999). The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation 5(4): 468-486.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. H., Murphy G. E., Petrosino, A. and Ghandi, A. G. (2008). The fairy godmother and her warts: making the dream of evidence-based policy come true. American Journal of Evaluation 29(1): 29-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932]Search in Google Scholar
[Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledge in Context. Science, Technology and Human Values 16: 111-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds.): Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. London: Sage, 44-83. ]Search in Google Scholar
