The Errors in Visual Estimation of Plants Cover in the Context of Education of Phytosociology

[1] Everson CS, Clarke GPY. A comparison of six methods of botanical analysis in the montane grasslands of Natal. Vegetatio. 1987;73(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1007/BF00031850.10.1007/BF00031850Search in Google Scholar

[2] Griffin GF. An enhanced wheel-point method for assessing cover, structure and heterogeneity in plant communities. J Range Manage Arch. 1989;42(1):79-81. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/viewFile/4810/4421.10.2307/3899664Search in Google Scholar

[3] Evans RA, Love RM. The step-point method of sampling-a practical tool in range research. J Range Manage Arch. 1957;10(5):208-212. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/viewFile/4810/4421.10.2307/3894015Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kent M. Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach. John Wiley Sons; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Londo G. The decimal scale for relev6s of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio. 1976;33:61-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00055300.10.1007/BF00055300Search in Google Scholar

[6] Van der Maarel E. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio. 1979;39(2):97-114. DOI: 10.1007/BF00052021.10.1007/BF00052021Search in Google Scholar

[7] Van der Maarel E. Transformation of cover abundance values for appropriate numerical treatment. Alternatives to the proposals by Podani. J Veg Sci. 2007;18(5):767-770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02592.x.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02592.xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Podani J. Braun-Blanquet’s legacy and data analysis in vegetation science. J Veg Sci. 2006;17:113-117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02429.x.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02429.xSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Domin K. Problémy a metody rostlinné sociologie a jejich použiti pro výzkum lučnich a pastvinǽch porosto Republiky Ceskoslovenské [Problems and methods of plant sociology and their application for the analysis of meadows and pastures]. Publ. Min. Zem. 1923;39:1-376.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Currall JEP. A transformation of the Domin scale. Vegetatio. 1987;72(2):81-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF00044837.10.1007/BF00044837Search in Google Scholar

[11] Doing Kraft H. L’analyse. des carrés permanents. (Analyses. Permanent quadrats). Acta Bot Neerl. 1954;3(3):421-424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1954.tb00307.x.10.1111/j.1438-8677.1954.tb00307.xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Lepš J, Hadincová V. How reliable are our vegetation analyses? J Veg Sci. 1992;3:119-124. DOI: 10.2307/3236006.10.2307/3236006Search in Google Scholar

[13] Klimeš L. Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover. J Veg Sci. 2003;14:815-821. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02214.x.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02214.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Górecki A, Kozłowski J, Gębczyński M. Ćwiczenia z ekologii. Podręcznik dla studentów biologii ogólnej i biologii środowiskowej [Ecology excercises. Handbook for student of basic ecology and environmental biology]. Kraków, Białystok: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Filia Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego; 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-1. 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Search in Google Scholar

[16] R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Austria: 2016. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Baselga A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19:134-143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.xSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Baselga A. The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21:1223-1232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00756.x.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00756.xSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Roe CM, Parker GC, Korsten AC, Lister CJ, Weatherall SB, Lodge L, et al. Small-scale spatial autocorrelation in plant communities: the effects of spatial grain and measure of abundance, with an improved sampling scheme. J Veg Sci. 2012;23(3):471-482. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01375.x.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01375.xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Hurlbert SH. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr. 1984;54(2):187-211. DOI: 10.2307/1942661.10.2307/1942661Search in Google Scholar

[21] Beatty SW, Stone EL. The variety of soil microsites created by tree falls. Can J Forest Res. 1986;16(3):539-548. DOI: 10.1139/x86-094.10.1139/x86-094Search in Google Scholar

[22] Klama H. Distribution patterns of liverworts in natural forest communities (Białowieża Primeval Forest, NE Poland). Bielsko-Biała: Wyd. Akad. Techniczno-Humanistycznej; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Drew WB. Studies on the use of the point-quadrat method of botanical analysis of mixed pasture vegetation. J Agr Res. 1944;69(7):289-297.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D. Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry. 1999;72(1):59-74. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/72.1.59.10.1093/forestry/72.1.59Search in Google Scholar

[25] Chmura D, Salachna A, Sierka E. Porównanie oceny zwarcia drzewostanu za pomocą metody wizualnej i zwarciomierza [Comparison of visual estimation of the canopy cover with the canopyscope assessment]. Sylwan. 2016;160(6):475-481. https://sylwan.lasy.gov.pl.Search in Google Scholar