[1. Allende, G. B., G. St Ill. Solving Bi-Level Programs with the KKT-Approach. – Math. Program, Ser. A., Vol. 138, 2013, pp. 309-332. DOI 10.1007/s10107-012-0535-x.art%3A10.1007%2Fs10107-012-0535-x.pdf10.1007/s10107-012-0535-x.art%3A10.1007%2Fs10107-012-0535-x.pdf]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Angelova, V. Investigations in the Area of Soft Computing. Targeted State of the Art Report. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 1, pp. 18-24. http://www.cit.iit.bas.bg/CIT_09/v9-1/18-24.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bard, J. F. Coordination of Multi-Divisional Firm through Two Levels of Management. – Omega, Vol. 11, 1982, No 5, pp. 457-465.10.1016/0305-0483(83)90038-5]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bard, J. F. Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications. The Netherlands, Kluwer, 1998.10.1007/978-1-4757-2836-1]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Calvete, H. I., C. Galé, M. Oliveros. Bi-Level Model for Production Distribution Planning Solved by Using Ant Colony Optimization. – Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 38, 2011, No 1, pp. 320-327.10.1016/j.cor.2010.05.007]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Cecchini, M., J. Ecker, M. Kupferschmid, R. Leitch. Solving Nonlinear Principalagent Problems Using Bilevel Programming. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 230, 2013, No 2, pp. 364-373.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.014]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Colson, B., P. Marcotte, G. Savard. An Overview of Bi-Level Optimization. – Annals of Operational Research, Vol. 153, 2007, pp. 235-256.10.1007/s10479-007-0176-2]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dempe, S. Annotated Bibliography on Bilevel Programming and Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. – Optimization, Vol. 52, 2003, No 3, pp. 339-359.10.1080/0233193031000149894]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dempe, S., V. V. Kalashnikov, G. A. Pérez-Valdés, N. Kalashnykova. Natural Gas Bi-Level Cash-Out Problem: Convergence of a Penalty Function Method. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 215, 2011, No 3, pp. 532-538.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Fampa, M., L. Barroso, D. Candal, L. Siimonetti. Bi-Level Optimization Applied to Strategic Pricing in Competitive Electricity Markets. – Computational Optimization and Applications, Vol. 39, 2008, No 2, pp. 121-142.10.1007/s10589-007-9066-4]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Fang, S., P. Guo, M. Li, L. Zhang. Bi-Level Multi-Objective Programming Applied to Water Resources Allocation. – Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2013, 2013, Article ID 837919. 9 p.10.1155/2013/837919]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ford, L. R. Jr., D. R. Fulkerson. Maximal Flow through a Network. – Canadian Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 8, 1956, pp. 399-404. DOI:10.4153/cjm-1956-045-5, MR 007925110.4153/CJM-1956-045-5]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Gomory, R. E., T. C. H u. Multi-Terminal Network Flows. – Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 9, December 1961, No 4, pp. 551-570.10.1137/0109047]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Harris, T. E., F. S. Ross. Fundamentals of a Method for Evaluating Rail Net Capacities. (U), RM-1 573, 24 October, 1955.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Ho, H. W., S. C. Wong. Housing Allocation Problem in a Continuum Transportation System. – Transportmetrica, Vol. 3, 2007, No 1, pp. 21-39.10.1080/18128600708685666]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kalashnikov, V., S. Dempe, G. A. Pérez-Valdés, N. Kalashnykova, J. F. Camacho-Vallejo. Bilevel Programming and Applications. Review Article. – Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2015, 2015, Article ID 310301. 16 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/31030110.1155/2015/310301]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Kara, B. Y., V. Verter. Designing a Road Network for Hazardous Materials Transportation. – Transportation Science, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 188-196.10.1287/trsc.1030.0065]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Kheirkhah, A., N. Hamid Reza, M. B. Masume. A Bi-Level Network Interdiction Model for Solving the Hazmat Routing Problem. – Special Issue: Transportation in Supply Chain Management, Vol. 54, 2016, Issue 2, pp. 459-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.108406110.1080/00207543.2015.1084061]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Kkaydin, Hande, Necati Aras, I. Kuban Altnel. Competitive Facility Location Problem with Attractiveness Adjustment of the Follower: A Bilevel Programming Model and Its Solution. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 208, 2011, No 3, pp. 206-220.10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.009]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kovacevic, R., G. Ch. Pflug. Electricity Swing Option Pricing by Stochastic Bilevel Optimization: A Survey and New Approaches. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 237, 2014, Issue 2, pp. 389-403.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.029]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Kücükaydin, H., N. Aras, I. K. Altinel. Competitive Facility Location Problem with Attractiveness Adjustment of the Follower: A Bi-Level Programming Model and Its Solution. – European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 208, 2011, No 3, pp. 206-220.10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.009]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Morton, D., F. Pan, K. Saeger. Models for Nuclear Smuggling Interdiction. – IIE Transactions, Vol. 39, 2007, No 1, pp. 3-14.10.1080/07408170500488956]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Outrata, J., M. Kocvara. Effective Reformulations of the Truss Topology Design Problem. – Optimization and Engineering, Vol. 7, 2006, pp. 201-219.10.1007/s11081-006-6839-z]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Peneva V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Relations. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 8, 2008, No 4, pp. 3-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, pp. 58-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Radeva, I. Multicriteria Models for Clusters Design. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 13, 2013, No 1, pp. 18-33. http://www.cit.iit.bas.bg/CIT_2013/v13-1/Radeva.pdf10.2478/cait-2013-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Schrijver, A. On the History of the Transportation and Maximum Flow Problems. – Documenta Mathematica, Extra Volume ISMP, 2012, pp. 169-180. http://www.math.uiuc.edu/documenta/vol-ismp/33_schrijver-alexander-tmf.pdf10.4171/dms/6/20]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Stoilov, T., K. Stoilova, M. Papageorgiou, I. Papamichail. Bi-Level Optimization in a Transport Network. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 15, 2015, No 5, pp. 37-49.10.1515/cait-2015-0015]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Stoilova, K., T. Stoilov, K. Nikolov. Autonomic Properties in Traffic Control. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 13, 2013, No 4, pp. 18-32.10.2478/cait-2013-0050]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Sun, H., Z. Gao, J. Wu. A Bi-Level Programming Model and Solution Algorithm for the Location of Logistics Distribution Centers. – Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 32, 2008, No 4, pp. 610-616.10.1016/j.apm.2007.02.007]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Vicente, L. N., P. H. Calamai. Bilevel and Multilevel Programming: A Bibliography Review. – Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 5, 2004, No 3, pp. 291-306.10.1007/BF01096458]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Wang, F. J., J. Periaux. Multi-Point Optimization Using Gas and Nash/Stackelberg Games for High Lift Multi-Airfoil Design in Aerodynamics. – In: Proc. of Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2001), 2001, pp. 552-559.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Xu, J., Y. Tu, Z. Zeng. Bi-Level Optimization of Regional Water Resources Allocation Problem under Fuzzy Random Environment. – Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 139, 2013, No 3, pp. 246-264.10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000248]Search in Google Scholar
[34. https://yalmip.github.io/command/solvebilevel/]Search in Google Scholar