Bicameralism: European Tendencies and Perspectives for Ukraine

Aroney, N. (2008), ‘Four reasons for an upper house. Representative democracy, public deliberation, legislative outputs and executive accountability,’ Adelaide Law Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 205-246.Search in Google Scholar

Avtonomov, A. S. (2013), ‘Istoki i smysl dvukhpalatnosti parlamentov [The origins and meaning of bicameral parliaments],’ Vìsnik Mariupol′s′kogo derzhavnogo universitetu, vol. 5, pp. 35-42.Search in Google Scholar

Bean, C. S. & Wattenberg, M. P. (1998), ‘Attitudes towards divided government and ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114985070510.1080/10361149850705Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1816), Tactiques de assemblée legislatives, suivi d’un traité des sophismes politiques, 2nd vol., translated by Dumont, Geneva & Paris: J. J. Paschaud.Search in Google Scholar

Bordenyuk, V. I. (2011), ‘Deiaki pytannia stvorennia dvopalatnoho parlamentuv Ukrayini u konteksti zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Some issues of creating a bicameral parliament in Ukraine in the context of foreign experience],’ Derzhava i Pravo, vol. 51, pp. 201-208.Search in Google Scholar

Bradbury, J. Ch. & Crain, W. M. (2001), ‘Legislative organization and government spending: cross-country evidence,’ Journal of Public Economics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00150-X10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00150-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bradbury, J. Ch. & Crain, W. M. (2002), ‘Bicameral legislatures and fiscal policy,’ Southern Economic Journal, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 646-659. https://doi.org/10.2307/106172310.2307/1061723Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brennan, G. & Hamlin, A. (1992), ‘Bicameralism and majoritarian equilibrium,’ Public Choice, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0014076510.1007/BF00140765Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Coakley, J. (2014), ‘The strange revival of bicameralism’, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.92616810.1080/13572334.2014.926168Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Coakley, J. & Laver, M. (1996), ‘Options for the Future of Seanad Éireann,’ in The All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, Second Progress Report, pp. 32-107. Retrieved from https://www.constitution.ie/Documents/Oireachtas%202nd-Report-Seanad%201997.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017] https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.92616810.1080/13572334.2014.926168Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Congleton, R. D. (2003), ‘On the merits of bicameral legislatures: policy predictability within partisan polities,’ Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, vol. 22, pp. 29-49.Search in Google Scholar

Constitution of Ukraine (1996), Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny, Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny, 1996, 30, 141.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Assembly of Ukraine (2013), Pro proekt Kontseptsiyi vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsiyi Ukrayiny [On the concept of amending the Constitution of Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://jurliga.ligazakon.ua/news/2013/6/20/93050.htm [accessed 9 Dec 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Dhami, S. & al-Nowaihi, A. (2007), ‘Optimal distribution of powers in a federation: a simple, unified framework,’ Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 197-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-3378.2007.00257.x10.1111/j.0307-3378.2007.00257.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Drexhage, B. (2015), Bicameral Legislatures: An International Comparison, The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Directorate of Constitutional Affairs and Legislation.Search in Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. & Thies, M. F. (2002), ‘The importance of concurrence: the impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 760-771. https://doi.org/10.2307/308843210.2307/3088432Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Esmein, A. (1896), Éléments de droit constitutionnel, Paris: Librarie Larose. Search in Google Scholar

Fisun O. A., ed. (2008), Dvopalatnyi parlament: svitovyi dosvid ta ukrayins′ki realiyi [Bicameral parliament: world experience and Ukrainian realities], Kharkiv: Zoloti Storinky.Search in Google Scholar

Forum of the World’s Senates (2000), Bicameralism around the World: Position and Prospects. Retrieved from http://www.senat.fr/senatsdumonde/forumdessenats/senats_secondeschambresmonde/english/english-synthese.html#fn1 [accessed 9 Dec 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Ganghof, S. (2014), ‘Bicameralism as a form of government (or: why Australia and Japan do not have a parliamentary system),’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss08110.1093/pa/gss081Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gélard, P. (2006), ‘Parliamentary complexity or democratic necessity?’ Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) Report, 11.08.2006. Retrieved from http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL(2006)059-e [accessed 9 Dec 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Goot, M. (1999), ‘Whose mandate? Policy promises, strong bicameralism and polled opinion,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114995026310.1080/10361149950263Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hammond, T. H. & Miller, G. J. (1987), ‘The core of the Constitution,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1155-1174. https://doi.org/10.2307/196258310.2307/1962583Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heller, W. B. (1997), ‘Bicameralism and budget deficits: the effect of parliamentary structure on government spending,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 485-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/44034010.2307/440340Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heller, W. B. (2001), ‘Political denials: the policy effect of intercameral partisan differences in bicameral parliamentary systems,’ Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/17.1.3410.1093/jleo/17.1.34Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Herman, V. & Mendel, F. (1976), Parliaments of the World: A Reference Compendium, London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311169105310.1515/9783111691053Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hickey, R. (2013), ‘Bicameral bargaining and federation formation,’ Public Choice, vol. 154, nos. 3-4, pp. 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9815-x 10.1007/s11127-011-9815-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Holovaty S. P., ed. (1997), Konstytutsiia nezalezhnoyi Ukrayiny [The Constitution of the independent Ukraine], vol. 1, Kyiv: Ukrainian Legal Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Inter-Parliamentary Union (1962), Parliaments: A Comparative Study on the Structure and Functioning of Representative Institutions in Forty-One Countries, London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Inter-Parliamentary Union (1986), Parliaments of the World: A Comparative Reference Compendium, vol. 2, New York: Facts on File Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Joyal, S. (2003), Protecting Canadian Democracy: The Senate You Never Knew, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.1515/9780773571341Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T. (2016), ‘Estonia as an EU Member State: Lack of pro-active constitutional dialogue,’ in A. H. Morawa (ed.) Constitutional Evolution in Central and Eastern Europe: Expansion and Integration in the EU, Routledge, pp. 11-41.Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T. & Chochia, A., eds. (2016), Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham, Heidelberg & New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-910.1007/978-3-319-27383-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2tOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Luther, J.; Passaglia, P. & Tarchi, R. (2006), A World of Second Chambers. Handbook for Constitutional Studies on Bicameralism, Milan: Giuffre.Search in Google Scholar

Manning, H. & Loomis, B. A. A. (2014), ‘Bicameralism, Representation and Governance: An Australian-American Comparison,’ Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association Conference University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 28 September - 1 October 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.250073010.2139/ssrn.2500730Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Massicotte, L. (2001), ‘Legislative unicameralism: a global survey and a few case studies,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/71400386510.1080/714003865Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mastlas, J. & Grange, L., eds. (1987), Les secondes chambres du parlement en Europe occidentale, Paris: Economica.Search in Google Scholar

Mughan, A. & Patterson, S. Ch. (1999), ‘Senates: A Comparative Perspective,’ in S. Ch. Patterson & A. Mughan (eds.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

One Text Initiative Research & Development (2011), An Introduction to Bicameral Legislature: Theory and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.onetext.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/02_May-2011.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Prelot, M. (1955), Precis de droit constitutionnel, 3rd ed., Paris: Librarie Dalloz. Search in Google Scholar

Riker, W. H. (1992), ‘The justification of bicameralism,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121920130010710.1177/019251219201300107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Russell, M. (2000), Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from Overseas, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Russell, M. (2001), ‘What are second chambers for?’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 54, pp. 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/54.3.44210.1093/parlij/54.3.442Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schmitt, P. (2014), ‘Comparative Overview of Consultative Practices within the Second Chambers of EU National Legislatures,’ European Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from http://cor.europa.eu/en/documentation/studies/Documents/comparative-overview-of-consultative-practices-within-the-second-chambers-ofeu-national-legislatures.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Senates and Representation of Local Authorities (2001), [Home page]. Retrieved from http://www.senateurope.org/eng/06062001.html [accessed 9 Dec 2017]Search in Google Scholar

Slovska, I. Ye. (2013), Konstytutsiyno-pravovyi status parlamentu - Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny [Constitutional and legal status of parliament], Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, D. E. (2003), The Canadian Senate in Bicameral Perspective, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/978144268060910.3138/9781442680609Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Svyatotsky, A. & Chushenko, B. (1998), ‘Pytannia teoriyi i praktyky konstytutsionalizmu v Ukrayini’ [Problems in the theory and practice of constitutionalism in Ukraine], Pravo Ukrayiny, vol. 2, pp. 17-20.Search in Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. & Money, J. (1997), Bicameralism, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609350Search in Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. & Rash, B. E. (1995), ‘Patterns of bicameralism,’ in H. Döring (ed.) Parliaments in Western Europe: Majority Rule and Minority Rights, New York: St. Martin Press, pp. 365-390.Search in Google Scholar

Tsybulenko, E. & Pakhomenko, S. (2016), ‘The Ukrainian crisis as a challenge for the Eastern Partnership,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal erspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer, pp. 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_1110.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Uhr, J. (1999), ‘Generating divided government: the Australian Senate,’ in S. Ch. Patterson & A. Mughan (eds.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, pp. 93-119.Search in Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (2012), ‘Bicameralism’: Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper 12-19, New York: New York University School of Law.Search in Google Scholar

Warwick, P. (1992), ‘Ideological diversity and governmental survival in Western European parliamentary democracies,’ Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 332-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041409202500300310.1177/0010414092025003003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Warwick, P. (1994), Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511528132Search in Google Scholar

Wasowicz, М. (1992), ‘Les changements des attributions de la chambre haute des parlements en Europe au XIXe siècle et au début du XXe siècle,’ in H. Blom, W. Blockmans & H. de Schepper (eds.) Bicameralisme, Tweekamerstelsel vroeger en nu - Handelingen van de Internationale Conferentie ter gelegenheid van het 175-jarig bestaan van de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal in de Nederlanden, Den Haag, pp. 131-138.Search in Google Scholar

Zhuravskiy, V. (2001), Ukrayins′kyi parlamentaryzm na suchasnomu etapi. Teoretykopravovyi aspect [Ukrainian parliamentarism on the modern stage. Theoretical and legal aspects], Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Korets′koho NAN Ukrayiny.Search in Google Scholar