[1. Hansen N.: Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening, Scripta Materialia, 51 8 (2004) 801–806.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Świątek-Prokop J.: Theses Academy. Jan Dlugosz in Czestochowa, series: Technical Education and Informatics. 2012 z. VII, http://www.pneti.ajd.czest.pl/docs/tom7/art/js_a.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Price R.L., Waid M.C., Haberstroh K.M., Webster T.J.: Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 1877.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Grabowska J.: Fulereny – przyszłość zastosowań w medycynie i farmacji, Gazeta Farmaceutyczna 6 (2008) 38.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Rupp R., Rosenthal S.L., Stanberry L.R.: VivaGel (SPL7013 Gel): a candidate dendrimer--microbicide for the prevention of HIV and HSV infection., Int. J. Nanomedicine, 2 (2007) 561.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Madani S.Y, Tan A., Dwek M., Seifalian A.M.: Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their binding to cancer cells. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 7 (2012) 905.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Główka E., Sapin-Minet A., Leroy P., Lulek J., Maincent P.: Preparation and in vitro-in vivo evaluation of salmon calcitonin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles. J. Microencapsul. 27 (1) (2010) 25.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Wang X., Wei F., Liu A., Wang L., Wang J-C., Ren L., Liu W., Tu Q., Wang L.: Cancer stem cell labeling using poly(l-lysine)-modified iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 33 (14) (2012) 3719.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Chang Y., Liu Y., Ho J., Hsu S., Lee O.: Amine surface modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles interfere with differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. of Orthopaedic Research. 2 (2012) 1499-506.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Jędrzejczyk W., Nanotechnology in medycine, Meritum 2, (2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Donaldson L.: Nanosystem for effectively targeting glioblastoma: Biomaterials. Materials today, vol.14, 12 (2011) 576.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Masaoka S., Ohe T., Sakota N.: Production of cellulose from glucose by Acetobacter xylinum. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 75 (1993) 18–22.10.1016/0922-338X(93)90171-4]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Park J. K., Jung J. Y., Park Y. H.: Cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii in a medium containing ethanol. Biotechnol. Lett. 25 (24) (2003) 2055–2059.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Keshk S., Sameshima K.: Influence of lignosulfonate on crystal structure and productivity of bacterial cellulose in a static culture. Enzyme and Microbiol. Technology 40 (2006) 4–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Toda K., Asakura T., Fukaya M., Entani E., Kawamura Y.: Cellulose production by acetic acid-resistant Acetobacter xylinum J. Ferment. Bioeng. 84 (3) (1997) 228–231.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Bae S., Shoda M.: Statistical optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production using Box-Behnken design. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90 (1) (2005) 20–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Premjet S., Premjet D., Ohtani Y.: The effect of ingredients of sugar cane molasses on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 10245. Sen-I Gakkaishi 63 (8) (2007) 193–199.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kong H. :Invention controls weavers of nanoscale biomaterials, Tech V. November 12 (2008) http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Beck-Candanedo S., Roman M., Gray D. G.: Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Properties and Behavior of Wood Cellulose Nanocrystal Suspensions. Biomacromolecules. 6 (2005) 1048-1054.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Klemm D., Philipp B., Heinze T., Heinze U., Wagenknecht W.: Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry Volume 1and 2. Wiley-VCH [ed]. Germany. (1998).10.1002/3527601937]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Klemm D., Heublein B., Fink H.P., Bohn A.: Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material Biopolymers, Angew. Chem. Int. [ed]. 44 3358 (2005).10.1002/anie.20046058715861454]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Klemm D., Schmauder H. P., Heinze T., Steinbüchel A., Wiley-VCH [ed]. Germany. p. 257. (2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hon D. N. S., Shiraishi N.: Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry 2nd. Marcel Dekker Inc. [ed]. New York. (2001).]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Kamide K.: Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives. Elsevier. Netherlands (2005).]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Zugenmaier P.: Crystalline Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg (2007).10.1007/978-3-540-73934-0]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Brown R. M., Saxena I. M.: Cellulose: Molecular and Structural Biology. Springer. Netherlands (2007).10.1007/978-1-4020-5380-1]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Helenius G., Bäckdahl H., Bodin A., Nanmark U., Gatenholm P., Risberg B.: In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 76 (2) (2006) 431.10.1002/jbm.a.3057016278860]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Esguerra M., Fink H., Laschke M. W., Delbro D., Jeppsson A., Gatenholm P., Menger M. G., Risberg B.: Polysaccharides as Cell Carriers for Tissue Engineering: the Use of Cellulose in Vascular Wall Reconstruction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. (2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Yamanaka S., Watanabe K., Kitamura N., Iguchi M., Mitsuhashi S., Nishi Y., Uryu M.: The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J. Mater. Sci. 24 (1989) 3141.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Cannon R. E., Anderson S. M.: Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 17 (1991) 435.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Czaja W., Krystynowicz A., Bielecki S., Brown R. M.: Celuloza bakteryjna jako nanobiomateria. Biomaterials 27 (2006)145.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Czaja W. K., Young D. J., Kawecki M., Brown R. M.: The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8 (2007) 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Lanyon Y. H., Marrazza G, Tothill IE, Mascini M: Benzene analysis in workplace air using an FIA-based bacterial biosensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 20 (2005) 2089–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Dourado F., Gama M.: Bacterial Nano Cellulose - innovative Biopolymer in Research and Application. 3rd scientific meeting of the institute for biotechnology and bioengineering. Lisboa. March (2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Andrade F.K., Pertile R.A.N., Dourado F., Gama F.M.: Bacterial Cellulose: properties, production and applications in Cellulose: Structure and Properties. Derivatives and Industrial Uses. Nova Science Publishers. 18 (2010) 427-458.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Nogi M., Yano H.: Transparent nanocomposites based on cellulose produced by bacteria offer potential innovation in the electronics device industry. Adv. Mater. 20 (2009) 1849.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Klemm D., Schumann D., Kramer F., Heßler N., Hornig M., Schmauder H. P., Marsch S., Nanocelluloses as Innovative Polymers in Research and Application. Adv. Polym. Sci. 205 (2006) 49.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Grande C.J., Torres F.G., Gomez C.M., Troncoso O.P, Canet-Ferrer J., Martinez-Pastor J.: Morphological characterisation of bacterial Cellulose-Starch nanocomposites. Polym. Composites. 16 (2008) 181–185.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Bäckdahl H., Helenius G., Bodin A., Johansson B., Nanmark U., Risberg B., Gatenholm P., Bacterial Cellulose as Potential Scaffold for Tissue Engineered Blood Vessels: Mechanical Properties and Cell Interactions. Biomaterials 27 (2006) 2141.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Yano H., Sugiyama J., Nakagaito A.N., Nogi M., Matsura T., Hikita H., Handa K., Optically Transparent Composites Reinforced with Networks of Bacterial Nanofibers. Adv. Mater. 17 (2005) 153.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Gatenholm P., Klemm D.: Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical Applications. mrs bulletin. (2010) 35.10.1557/mrs2010.653]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Ramana K. V., Singh L.: Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16 (3) (2000) 245–248.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Bacterial Cellulose. October 29. 2010. http://www.warsawvoice.pl. date of download: (2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Majda B., Bowil Biotech, www.biotechnologia.pl. date of download: (2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Bielecki S., Kalinowska H.: Biotechnology nanomaterials. Post. Mikrobiologii, 47 (2008) 163-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Dinand E., Chanzy H., Vignon M. R.: Parenchymal cell cellulose from sugar beet pulp: preparation and properties. Cellulose. 3 (1996) 183-188.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Bijak M.: Sztuczna zastawka serca, www.echirurgia.pl. date of download: (2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Avery N. C., Sims T. J., Warkup C., Bailey A. J.: Collagen cross-linking in porcine m. longissimus lumborum: absence of a relationship with variation in texture at pork weight. Meat Sci. 42 (1996) 355-369.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Dinand E., Vignon M. R.: Isolation and NMR characterization of a (4-O-methyl-D-glucurono)-D-xylan from sugar beet pulp. Carbohydr. Res. 330 (2001) 285-288.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Shah J., Brown M. R. J. R.: Towards electronic paper. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66 (2005) 352-355.10.1007/s00253-004-1756-615538556]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Ślęzak A., Kucharzewski M., Jasik-Ślęzak J.: The characteristics of medical dressings bacterial cellulose membrane. Department of Biology and Biophysics, University of Czestochowa. Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Silesia in Bytom. http://www.dbc.wroc.pl/Content/2112/202_Slez.pdf. date of download: (2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Baptista A., Ferreira I., Borges J.: Cellulose-Based Bioelectronic Devices. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/56721. date of download: (2016).10.5772/56721]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Finkenstadt V. L.: Natural polysaccharides as electroactive polymers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 67 (2005) 735-745.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Xiank Q., Kim J. S., Lee Y. Y.: A comprehensive kinetic model for di lute-acid hydrolyssys of cellulose, App. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105-108 (2003) 337-357.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Ogawa R., Tokura S.: Preparation of bacterial cellulose containing N-acetylglucosamine residues. Carbohydr. Polym. 19 (1992) 171-178.]Search in Google Scholar
