Correlation between age and head diameters in the paediatric patients during CT examination of the head

[1] Kalender WA. X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(13):R29-R43.10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R0316790909Search in Google Scholar

[2] Tootell A, Szczepura A, Hogg P. Analysis of effective and organ dose estimation in CT when using mA modulation: a single scanner pilot study. Radiography. 2017;23(2):159-166.10.1016/j.radi.2017.02.00628390549Search in Google Scholar

[3] Saito H, Ito T, Tsujiguchi T, et al. Characteristics of temporal resolution in 16- and 64-row computed tomography scanners. Radiol Phys Technol. 2018;11(1):100-108.10.1007/s12194-017-0436-z29264837Search in Google Scholar

[4] Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. Am J Radiol. 2009;192(4):887-892.10.2214/AJR.08.1351Search in Google Scholar

[5] Anam C, Budi WS, Adi K, et al. Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: Automated measurements. J Radiol Prot. 2019;39(3):783-793.10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc31117064Search in Google Scholar

[6] Brenner DJ. Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage? Rev Environ Health. 2010;25(1):63-67.10.1515/REVEH.2010.25.1.63Search in Google Scholar

[7] Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-2284.10.1056/NEJMra07214918046031Search in Google Scholar

[8] Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what paediatric health care providers should know. Paediatrics. 2003;112(4):951-957.10.1542/peds.112.4.95114523191Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kalender WA. Dose in x-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(3):R129-R150.10.1088/0031-9155/59/3/R12924434792Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zacharias C, Alessio AM, Otto RK, et al. Pediatric CT: Strategies to lower radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):950-956.10.2214/AJR.12.9026474884623617474Search in Google Scholar

[11] Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Haryanto F, et al. An evaluation of computed tomography dose index measurements using a pencil ionisation chamber and small detectors. J Radiol Prot. 2019;39(1):112-124.10.1088/1361-6498/aaf2b430524057Search in Google Scholar

[12] Leng S, Shiung M, Duan X, et al. Size-specific dose estimates for chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT: Effect of intra-patient variability in water-equivalent diameter. Radiology. 2015;276(1):184-190.10.1148/radiol.15142160447997325734556Search in Google Scholar

[13] The Report of AAPM Task Group 204. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in paediatric and adult body CT examinations. 2011. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[14] The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. Use of water equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. 2014. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_220.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. The evaluation of the effective diameter (Deff) calculation and its impact on the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Atom Indonesia. 2017;43(1):55-60.10.17146/aij.2017.617Search in Google Scholar

[16] Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Toyoda T, et al. A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;179(2):158-168.10.1093/rpd/ncx24129136233Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA, et al. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys. 2012;39(11):6764-6771.10.1118/1.4754303Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wang J, Christner JA, Duan Y, et al. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys. 2012;39(11):6772-6778.10.1118/1.475758623127071Search in Google Scholar

[19] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I. Automated estimation of patient’s size from 3D image of patient for size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). Adv Sci Eng Med. 2015;7(10):892-896.10.1166/asem.2015.1780Search in Google Scholar

[20] Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Roskopf M. Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations. Med Phys. 2000;27(5):838-844.10.1118/1.59894910841385Search in Google Scholar

[21] Menke J. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology. 2005;236(2):565-571.10.1148/radiol.236204132716040914Search in Google Scholar

[22] Toth T, Ge Z, Daly MP. The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. Med Phys. 2007;34(7):3093-3101.10.1118/1.274811317822016Search in Google Scholar

[23] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for truncated computed tomography images. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;175(3):313-320.10.1093/rpd/ncw32627885082Search in Google Scholar

[24] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. A fully automated calculation of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in thoracic and head CT examinations. J Phys: Conf Series. 2016;694:012030.10.1088/1742-6596/694/1/012030Search in Google Scholar

[25] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. The impact of patient table on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017;40(1):153-158.10.1007/s13246-016-0497-z27832459Search in Google Scholar

[26] The Report of AAPM Task Group 293. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for head CT. 2019. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_293.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Menke J. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology. 2005;236(2):565-571.10.1148/radiol.236204132716040914Search in Google Scholar

[28] Boos J, Kröpil P, Bethge OT. Accuracy of size-specific dose estimate calculation from center slice in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;178(1):8-19.10.1093/rpd/ncx06928541574Search in Google Scholar

[29] ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging. ICRU Report 74. J ICRU. 2005;5(2):89.10.1093/jicru_ndi016Search in Google Scholar

[30] Cheng PM, Vachon LA, Duddalwar VA. Automated paediatric abdominal effective diameter measurements versus age-predicted body size for normalization of CT dose. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(6):1151-1155.10.1007/s10278-013-9623-6382492323836080Search in Google Scholar

[31] Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D, et al. Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. Am J Radiol. 2010;194(6):1611-1619.10.2214/AJR.09.377120489103Search in Google Scholar

[32] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. Volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for tube current modulation (TCM) in CT scanning. Int J Radiat Res. 2018;16(3):289-297.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, et al. Automated calculation of water-equivalent diameter (DW) based on AAPM report TG. 220. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(4):320-333.10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171569005927455491Search in Google Scholar

[34] Gabusia M, Riccardia L, Alibertib C, et al. Radiation dose in chest CT: Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction. Phys Med. 2016;32(2):393-397.10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.00826781588Search in Google Scholar

[35] Burton CS, Szczykutowicz TP. Evaluation of AAPM reports 204 and 220: Estimation of effective diameter, water-equivalent diameter, and ellipticity ratios for chest, abdomen, pelvis, and head CT scans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(1):228-238.10.1002/acm2.12223576801429178549Search in Google Scholar

[36] AAPM, Paediatric Routine Head CT Protocols Version 1.1. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocols/documents/PediatricRoutineHeadCT.pdfSearch in Google Scholar