Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention

Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123–1144. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1565-y.BornmannL.2015Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetricsScientometrics10331123114410.1007/s11192-015-1565-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1405–1422. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1893-6.BornmannL.HaunschildR.2016How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter IndexScientometrics10731405142210.1007/s11192-016-1893-6486552627239079Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Adams, J. (2019). Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF). Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 325–340. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.008.BornmannL.HaunschildR.AdamsJ.2019Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF)Journal of Informetrics13132534010.1016/j.joi.2019.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics, 109(3), 1477–1495. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y.BornmannL.HaunschildR.MarxW.2016Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?Scientometrics10931477149510.1007/s11192-016-2115-y512403027942080Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2019). Library and Information Science papers as topics on Twitter: A network approach to measuring public attention. Paper presented at the ISSI 2019—17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rome, Italy.HaunschildR.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.2019Library and Information Science papers as topics on Twitter: A network approach to measuring public attentionPaper presented at the ISSI 2019—17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and InformetricsRome, ItalySearch in Google Scholar

Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 695–707. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008.HaunschildR.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.HellstenI.MarxW.2019Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtagsJournal of Informetrics13269570710.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2020). Corrigendum to “Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags” [J. Informetrics 13 (2019) 695–707]. Journal of Informetrics, 14(1), February 2020, 101020. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101020HaunschildR.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.HellstenI.MarxW.2020Corrigendum to “Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags” [J. Informetrics 13 (2019) 695–707]Journal of Informetrics141February202010102010.1016/j.joi.2020.101020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hellsten, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2020). Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio-semantic networks. JASIST, 71(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1002/asi.24207HellstenI.LeydesdorffL.2020Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio-semantic networksJASIST71131510.1002/asi.24207Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 3.6.0). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/R Core Team2019R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 3.6.0)Vienna, AustriaR Foundation for Statistical ComputingRetrieved from https://www.r-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Isett, K., Melkers, J., & Hicks, D. (2017). The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0183551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183551.Robinson-GarciaN.CostasR.IsettK.MelkersJ.HicksD.2017The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articlesPLOS ONE128e018355110.1371/journal.pone.0183551557026428837664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thelwall, M. (2018). Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1231–1240. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2715-9.ThelwallM.2018Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation countsScientometrics11531231124010.1007/s11192-018-2715-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wouters. P., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2019) Social media metrics for new research evaluation. In: Glänzel W., Moed H.F., Schmoch U., Thelwall M. (eds) Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham, pp 687–713.WoutersP.ZahediZ.CostasR.2019Social media metrics for new research evaluationIn:GlänzelW.MoedH.F.SchmochU.ThelwallM.(eds)Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer HandbooksSpringerCham68771310.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_26Search in Google Scholar