This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.CampbellD.StanleyJ.1963Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.ChicagoRand-McNallySearch in Google Scholar
Cook T., & Campbell, D.A. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. New York: Houghton Mifflin.CookT.CampbellD.A.1979Quasi-experimentation.New YorkHoughton MifflinSearch in Google Scholar
Carley, S., & Porter, A.L. (2012). A forward diversity index. Scientometrics, 90(2), 407–427.10.1007/s11192-011-0528-1CarleyS.PorterA.L.2012A forward diversity indexScientometrics902407427Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carley, S., Porter, A.L., Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (under review). Visualization of disciplinary profiles: Enhanced science overlay maps. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017(3), 68–111.CarleyS.PorterA.L.RafolsI.LeydesdorffL.(under review)Visualization of disciplinary profiles: Enhanced science overlay mapsJournal of Data and Information Science201736811110.1515/jdis-2017-0015Search in Google Scholar
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.De BellisN.2009Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetricsLanham, MDScarecrow PressSearch in Google Scholar
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batgelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (2nd Edition). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.de NooyW.MrvarA.BatgeljV.2011Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek2ndNew York, NYCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511996368Search in Google Scholar
Garner, J., Porter, A.L., Borrego, M., Tran, E., & Teutonico, R. (2013). Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program, Research Evaluation, 22(2), 134–144.GarnerJ.PorterA.L.BorregoM.TranE.TeutonicoR.2013Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics programResearch Evaluation22213414410.1093/reseval/rvt001Search in Google Scholar
Garner, J., Porter, A.L., & Newman, N.C. (2014). Distance and velocity measures: Using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact. Scientometrics, 100(3), 687–703.10.1007/s11192-014-1316-5GarnerJ.PorterA.L.NewmanN.C.2014Distance and velocity measures: Using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impactScientometrics1003687703Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Garner, J., Porter, A.L., Newman, N.C., & Crowl, T.A. (2012). Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF program. Research Evaluation, 21(2), 89–104.10.1093/reseval/rvs004GarnerJ.PorterA.L.NewmanN.C.CrowlT.A.2012Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF programResearch Evaluation21289104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.10.1023/A:1022378804087GlänzelW.SchubertA.2003A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposesScientometrics563357367Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hall, K.L., Stokols, D., Stipelman, B.A., Vogel, A.L., Feng, A., Masimore, B., Morgan, G., Moser, R.P., Marcus, S.E., & Berrigan, D. (2012). Assessing the value of team science: A study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(2), 157–163.10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.011HallK.L.StokolsD.StipelmanB.A.VogelA.L.FengA.MasimoreB.MorganG.MoserR.P.MarcusS.E.BerriganD.2012Assessing the value of team science: A study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grantsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine422157163358681922261212Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.10.1073/pnas.050765510216275915HirschJ.E.2005An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102461656916572128383216275915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455–476.10.1002/asi.20991KlavansR.BoyackK.W.2009Toward a consensus map of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology603455476Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2017). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 984–998.KlavansR.BoyackK.W.2017Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology68498499810.1002/asi.23734Search in Google Scholar
Kwon, S., Solomon, G.E.A., Youtie, J., & Porter, A.L. (under review). A measure of interdisciplinary knowledge flow between specific fields: Implications for impact and funding. PLoS One.29016631KwonS.SolomonG.E.A.YoutieJ.PorterA.L.(under review)A measure of interdisciplinary knowledge flow between specific fields: Implications for impact and fundingPLoS OneSearch in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosine versus the Jaccard Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.10.1002/asi.20732LeydesdorffL.2008On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosine versus the Jaccard IndexJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology5917785Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 707–714.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.2016The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology67370771410.1002/asi.23408Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science Categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.10.1007/s11192-012-0784-823335826LeydesdorffL.CarleyS.RafolsI.2013Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science CategoriesScientometrics942589593354724423335826Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.10.1002/asi.20967LeydesdorffL.RafolsI.2009A global map of science based on the ISI subject categoriesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology602348362Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP) (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP)2005Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research.Washington, DCNational Academies PressSearch in Google Scholar
Peck, L.R. (2016), Social experiments in practice: The what, why, when, where, and how of Experimental Design & Analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 152 (Winter), New York: Wiley.PeckL.R.2016Social experiments in practice: The what, why, when, where, and how of Experimental Design & AnalysisNew Directions for Evaluation, No. 152 (Winter)New YorkWileySearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Cohen, A.S., Roessner, J.D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5PorterA.L.CohenA.S.RoessnerJ.D.PerreaultM.2007Measuring researcher interdisciplinarityScientometrics721117147Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Garner, J., & Crowl, T. (2012). The RCN (Research Coordination Network) experiment: Can we build new research networks? BioScience, 62, 282–288.PorterA.L.GarnerJ.CrowlT.2012The RCN (Research Coordination Network) experiment: Can we build new research networks?BioScience6228228810.1525/bio.2012.62.3.9Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Newman, N.C., Myers, W., & Schoeneck, D. (2003). Projects and publications: Interesting patterns in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency research.Research Evaluation, 12(3), 171–182.10.3152/147154403781776609PorterA.L.NewmanN.C.MyersW.SchoeneckD.2003Projects and publications: Interesting patterns in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency researchResearch Evaluation123171182Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.PorterA.L.RafolsI.2009Is science becoming more interdisciplinary?Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics81371974510.1007/s11192-008-2197-2Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Roessner, J.D., & Heberger, A.E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273–282.10.3152/095820208X364553PorterA.L.RoessnerJ.D.HebergerA.E.2008How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?Research Evaluation174273282Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Schoeneck, D.J., & Carley, S. (2013). Measuring the extent to which a research domain is self-contained. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2013), July 15–19, Vienna, Austria.PorterA.L.SchoeneckD.J.CarleyS.2013Measuring the extent to which a research domain is self-containedIn Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2013)July 15–19Vienna, AustriaSearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Schoeneck, D.J., Roessner, D., & Garner, J. (2010). Practical research proposal and publication profiling. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 29–44.10.3152/095820210X492512PorterA.L.SchoeneckD.J.RoessnerD.GarnerJ.2010Practical research proposal and publication profilingResearch Evaluation1912944Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Schoeneck, D.J., Solomon, G., Lakhani, H., & Dietz, J. (2013). Measuring and mapping interdisciplinarity: Research & evaluation on education in science & engineering (“REESE”) and STEM. In American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, April 27–May 1, San Francisco.PorterA.L.SchoeneckD.J.SolomonG.LakhaniH.DietzJ.2013Measuring and mapping interdisciplinarity: Research & evaluation on education in science & engineering (“REESE”) and STEMIn American Education Research Association Annual MeetingApril 27–May 1San FranciscoSearch in Google Scholar
Rafols, I. (2014). Knowledge integration and diffusion: Measures and mapping of diversity and coherence. In Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (Eds.) Measuring scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice (pp. 169–190). Berlin: Springer.RafolsI.2014Knowledge integration and diffusion: Measures and mapping of diversity and coherenceDingY.RousseauR.WolframD.Measuring scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice169190BerlinSpringerSearch in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1823–1835.10.1002/asi.21086RafolsI.LeydesdorffL.2009Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effectsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60918231835Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.10.1007/s11192-009-0041-yRafolsI.MeyerM.2010Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscienceScientometrics822263287Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., Porter, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.10.1002/asi.21368RafolsI.PorterA.LeydesdorffL.2010Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library managementJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61918711887Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Riopelle, K., Leydesdorff, L., & Jie, L. (2014). How to Create an Overlay Map of Science Using the Web of Science. Retrieved from http://www.leydesdorff.net/overlaytoolkit/manual.riopelle.pdf.RiopelleK.LeydesdorffL.JieL.2014How to Create an Overlay Map of Science Using the Web of Science.Retrieved fromhttp://www.leydesdorff.net/overlaytoolkit/manual.riopelle.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.10.1098/rsif.2007.0213StirlingA.2007A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and societyJournal of the Royal Society Interface415707719237338917327202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wagner, C.S., Roessner, J.D., Bobb, K., Klein, J.T., Boyack, K.W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., & Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26.10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004WagnerC.S.RoessnerJ.D.BobbK.KleinJ.T.BoyackK.W.KeytonJ.RafolsI.BörnerK.2011Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literatureJournal of Informetrics511426Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, J., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2014). Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance and disparity (December 22, 2014). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2548957 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548957.WangJ.ThijsB.GlänzelW.2014Interdisciplinarity and impactDistinct effects of variety, balance and disparityDecember 222014Retrieved fromhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2548957orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.254895710.2139/ssrn.2548957Search in Google Scholar
Yegros-Yegros, A., Amat, C. B., d’Este, P., Porter, A.L., & Rafols, I. (2010). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher scientific impact? In Science and Technology Indicators (STI) Conference, September 8–11, Leiden, the Netherlands.Yegros-YegrosA.AmatC. B.d’EsteP.PorterA.L.RafolsI.2010Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher scientific impact?In Science and Technology Indicators (STI) ConferenceSeptember 8–11Leiden, the NetherlandsSearch in Google Scholar
Yegros-Yegros A., Rafols, I., & d’Este, P. (2015). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity, PLOS ONE, 10(8). Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135095.26266805Yegros-YegrosA.RafolsI.d’EsteP.2015Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarityPLOS ONE108Retrieved fromhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.013509510.1371/journal.pone.0135095453437926266805Search in Google Scholar
Youtie, J., Porter, A.L., Shapira, P., Tang, L., & Benn, T. (2011). The use of environmental, health and safety research in nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 11(1), 158–166.2144642110.1166/jnn.2011.3840YoutieJ.PorterA.L.ShapiraP.TangL.BennT.2011The use of environmental, health and safety research in nanotechnology researchJournal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology11115816621446421Search in Google Scholar
Youtie, J., Solomon, G.E.A., Carley, S., Kwon, S., & Porter, A.L. (2017). Crossing borders: A citation analysis of connections between Cognitive Science and Educational research and the fields in between. Research, 26(3), 242–255.YoutieJ.SolomonG.E.A.CarleyS.KwonS.PorterA.L.2017Crossing borders: A citation analysis of connections between Cognitive Science and Educational research and the fields in betweenResearch26324225510.1093/reseval/rvx020Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Ning, Z., Bai, X., Kong, X., Zhou, J., & Xia, F. (2017). Exploring time factors in measuring the scientific impact of scholars. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1301–1321.10.1007/s11192-017-2458-zZhangJ.NingZ.BaiX.KongX.ZhouJ.XiaF.2017Exploring time factors in measuring the scientific impact of scholarsScientometrics112313011321Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1257–1265.ZhangL.RousseauR.GlänzelW.2016Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into accountJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6751257126510.1002/asi.23487Search in Google Scholar
