Diagnostic pitfalls in identification of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica

1. Arbune M, Fotea S, Nechita A, Stefanescu V. Emerging Infection with Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in Neonate. A Case Report. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2018;4(3):96-100.10.2478/jccm-2018-0013Search in Google Scholar

2. Carvalho Filho EB, Marson FAL, Levy CE. Challenges in the identification of Chryseobacterium indologenes and Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in cases of nosocomial infections and patients with cystic fibrosis. New Microbes New Infect. 2017;20:27-3310.1016/j.nmni.2017.09.002Search in Google Scholar

3. Lau SKP, Chow WN, Foo CH, et al. Elizabethkingia anopheles bacteremia is associated with clinically significant infections and high mortality. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26045.10.1038/srep26045Search in Google Scholar

4. Lau SKP, Wu AKL, Teng JLL, Tse H, Curreem SOT, Tsui SKW. Evidence for Elizabethkingia anopheles Transmission from Mother to Infant, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):232-41.10.3201/eid2102.140623Search in Google Scholar

5. Lo H-H, Chang S-M. Identification, characterization, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium gleum isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79(3):298-302.10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.01.027Search in Google Scholar