Acceso abierto

Effect of hydrotherapy on sleep deficiency among older people in integrated community health services in Pandak I Bantul


Cite

Introduction

The proportion of aging population is increasing rapidly year by year, and the deep influence of this phenomenon on the economic and social conditions has been studied using multilateral approaches, such as social, physical, and psychological aspects. Data from the Central Bureau of Statistics show that the number of aged persons in Yogyakarta has increased from 492,200 in 2015 to 505,100 in 2016.1 Changes in the sleep pattern are experienced by older people. Bundlie2 states that there are age-related changes in sleep, namely, increased sleep latency, reduced sleep efficiency, increased nocturnal awakening, increased early morning awakening, and increased daytime sleepiness. Sleep quality is essential for older people’s well-being and health. Sleep quality in older people can be influenced by environment, pain,3 lifestyle,3 diet,4 psychological condition,4 treatment, and cognitive disorders.2,5

Relaxation technique is a nonpharmacological treatment that is applied to increase sleep efficiency and improve the quality of sleep. Hydrotherapy, a relaxation technique that uses warm water, can decrease stress,6 muscle stiffness,2,5 and pain, in addition to warming the body.7,5,8 The prevalence of sleep deprivation among older people in the Integrated Community Health Center, Pandak I Bantul, was found to slightly increase year by year. There is no previous study on water treatment for older people with sleep disorder in Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. This research aims to evaluate the effect of hydrotherapy on sleep deprivation among older people in the Integrated Community Health Center, Pandak I Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Methods
Protocol and registration

The research was conducted at the Integrated Community Health Center, Pandak I Bantul, Yogyakarta. The subjects were 66 older people with sleep disorder. The quality of sleep was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI questionnaire was modified by Herlina.4 The PQSI modification had validity and reliability. The r score was 0.528–0.934, and Cronbach’s alpha score was 0.889.7 The PSQI contains 15 questions with seven dimensions: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, duration of sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of medicines, and daytime sleepiness. Respondents were divided into an intervention group receiving hydrotherapy and a control group receiving no treatment; 33 people were included in each group.

Procedure

After choosing the intervention group, the PSQI questionnaire was administered to the participants. The intervention group did hydrotherapy once a day for a total of 7 days. First, they soaked their feet in warm water for 10 minutes. The water temperature was adjusted according to the body temperature, to approximately 40.0°C–43.0°C. Then, they took a bath with warm water. The hydrotherapy was performed in the afternoon for all patients. After 7 days of hydrotherapy, the questionnaires were given again to the participants. The lowest score in this questionnaire is zero and the highest score is 21. A score of zero shows better sleep quality, and the number 21 shows the worst quality of sleep. The quality of sleep is categorized as good if the PSQI score is 5 and as poor if the PSQI score is >5. The control group did not receive hydrotherapy but participated in regular activities.

Statistical analysis

Wilcoxon analysis was used to determine the difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of the effect of hydrotherapy treatment.9

Results

The data showed that the difference between the pretest and posttest scores for quality of sleep in the control group (0.42) with P= 0.059, which showed no significance. In addition, the research found that the mean pretest score for sleep quality in the intervention group was as high as 9.09 (SD: 2.57) and the posttest score was 4.42 (SD: 1.43). The mean score of the difference in sleep quality in the intervention group was 4.67. There was a significant difference in sleep quality before and after intervention using hydrotherapy, with P< 0.05.

Table 1 shows that before intervention, the respondents in the intervention group had poor sleep quality, with mean score = 9.09. After intervention, the mean score was 4.42. Meanwhile, the control group shows mean sleep quality scores as follows: pretest score was 7.51, and posttest score was 7.09.

Pretest and posttest sleep quality indexes in the intervention and control groups (n=33).

Sleep quality indexMeanSDMin–max
Intervention group
Pretest9.092.576–15
Posttest4.421.432–8
Control group
Pretest7.512.006–14
Posttest7.091.624–11

Data in Table 2 show that the mean score for each component of sleep quality index in the intervention group was decreased after hydrotherapy treatment (posttest result).

Sleep quality in the intervention group (n=33).

Sleep quality indexMeanSDMin–max
K1: Subjective sleep quality
Pretest1.390.491–2
Posttest1.000.350–2
K2: Sleep latency
Pretest2.660.641–3
Posttest0.750.750–3
K3: Duration of sleep
Pretest0.930.780–2
Posttest0,540.610–2
K4: Sleep efficiency
Pretest0.630.690–2
Posttest0.030.170–1
K5: Sleep disturbance
Pretest1.720.621–3
Posttest1.300,580–2
K6: Use of medicines
Pretest0.390.740–2
Posttest0.000.000–0
K7: Daytime sleepiness
Pretest1.330.640–3
Posttest0.780.820–2

The most noticeable change noted in Table 2 is that the use of medicines by the elderly in the intervention group decreased extremely, from a mean score of 0.39 to mean score of 0.00 (Table 3).

Sleep quality in the control group (n=33).

Sleep quality indexMeanSDMin–max
K1: Subjective sleep quality
Pretest1.150.440–2
Posttest1.120.410–2
K2: Sleep latency
Pretest1.300.880–3
Posttest0.930.740–3
K3: Duration of sleep
Pretest1.210.890–3
Posttest1.210.810–3
K4: Sleep efficiency
Pretest1.000.860–3
Posttest1.030.880–3
K5: Sleep disturbance
Pretest1.360.540–2
Posttest1.300.580–2
K6: Use of medicines
Pretest0.420.500–1
Posttest0.420.500–1
K7: Daytime sleepiness
Pretest1.000.820–2
Posttest0.930.780–2

Table 4 shows a significant result in the intervention group, with P = 0.000 (P<0.05). The mean score for sleep quality index on the pretest was 9.09 (SD: 2.57), while the posttest mean score was 4.42 (SD: 1.43), with difference in the score being as high as 4.67. The difference between the pretest and posttest scores in the control group was 0.42. However, it showed no significant difference (P=0.059).

The effect of hydrotherapy on sleep quality in the intervention and control groups (pre–post test design) (n=33).

MeanSDDifferenceP
MeanSD
Intervention group
Pretest9.092.574.671.140.000
Posttest4.421.43
Control group
Pretest7.512.000.420.480.059
Posttest7.091.62
Discussion

Hydrotherapy is the external or internal use of water, in the form of ice or warm water, at various temperatures and pressures, for various durations, and applied at different sites, for promotion of health or for treatment of various diseases.5 Hydrotherapy can improve blood circulation by expanding blood vessels. Analysis of the components of sleep quality in the intervention group shows significant difference before and after intervention: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of medicines, and daytime sleepiness. Hydrotherapy affects the level of serotonin hormone and makes people more relaxed, reducing the sleep deprivation of people as a result.5 From the data, it was found that the sleep disorder decreased after hydrotherapy. Low score of sleep quality is an indicator of good sleep quality; therefore, the data obtained from the present study show that hydrotherapy can increase the quality of sleep among older people.

According to the findings of the present study, there is a significant difference in the sleep quality among older people before and after the intervention using hydrotherapy. It shows that hydrotherapy treatment is effective in reducing sleep deficiency among older people. A previous study also found that the quality of life was increased and the depression level was decreased among elderly women who received hydrotherapy treatment.10 Another study also found that sleep quality was increased after hydrotherapy intervention (indoor warm pool) among older people with fibromyalgia (P=0.0001).8

Overall, the results of the study show that hydrotherapy is effective in reduction of sleep deficiency. Therefore, hydrotherapy treatment is recommended because it is effective in reducing sleep disorders among the elderly.

Conclusions

According to the results of the present study, it appears that the hydrotherapy practice is effective in reduction of sleep disorders among older people and can be considered as an effective intervention method. Further studies are required to find the mechanism of hydrotherapy and its use in other conditions, using larger sample sizes.

eISSN:
2544-8994
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing