[Acosta-Martínez V., Cruz L., Sotomayor-Ramírez D., Pérez-Alegría L. 2007. Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed. Applied Soil Ecology, 35, 35-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahmad N., Ul-Hassan F., Qadir G. 2007. Effect of Subsurface Soil Compaction and Improvement Measures on Soil Properties. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9, 509-513.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ammer S., Weber K., Abs C., Ammer C., Prietzel J. 2006.Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of earthworm Communities in pure and converted scots pine stands. Applied Soil Ecology, 33, 10-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arekhi S., Heydari M., Pourbabaei H. 2010. Vegetation- Environmental Relationships and Ecological Species Groups of the Ilam Oak Forest Landscape, Iran. Caspian Journal of Environment Science, 8, 115-125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aubert M., Hedde M., Decaens T., Bureau F., Margerie P., Alard D. 2003. Effects of tree canopy composition on earthworms and other macro-invertebrates in beech forests of upper Normandy (France). Pedobiologia, 47, 904-912.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastida F., Moreno J.L., Hernández T., García C., 2007.The long-term effects of the management of a forest soil on its carbon content, microbial biomass and activity under a semi-arid climate. Applied Soil Ecology, 37, 53-62.10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.03.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhadauria T., Kumar P., Kumar R., Maikhuri R.K., Rao K.S., Saxena K.G. 2012. Earthworm populations in a traditional village landscape in Central Himalaya, India. Applied Soil Ecology, 53, 83-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhardwaj A.K., Jasrotia P., Hamilton S.K., Robertson G.P. 2011. Ecological management of intensively cropped agro-ecosystems improves soil quality with sustained productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140, 419-429.]Search in Google Scholar
[Black C.A. 1979. Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, 2, 771-1572.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blake G.R., Hartage K.H. 1986. Bulk Density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis (ed.: A. Klute), Agronomy Monograph, Madison, 363-367.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouyoucos G.J. 1927. The hydrometer as a new method for the mechanical analysis of soils. Soil Sicience, 23, 343-353.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyer J., Micellon R., Chabanne A., Reversat G., Tiber R. 1991. Effect of terfoli cover crop and earthworm inoculation on maize crop and soil organisms in Reunion Island. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2, 364-370.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brady N., Weil R. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Pearson Perntice Hall, New Jersey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bray R.H., Kurtz L.T. 1945. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils.Soil Science, 59, 39-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bremmer J.M., Mulvaney C.S. 1982. Nitrogen total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 9 (eds.: A.L. Page et al.), American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, 595-624.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchanan M.A., Russel E., Block S.D. 1988. Chemical Characterization and Nitrogen Mineralisation Potentials of Vermicompost Derived from Differing Organic Wastes. In: Earthworm in Waste and Environmental Management (eds.: C.A. Edward and E.F. Neuhauser), SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, 231-240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckerfield J.C., Lee K.E., Davoren C.W., Hannay J.N.1997. Earthworms as indicators of sustainable production in dryland cropping in southern Australia.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29, 547-554.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chan K.Y., Barchia I. 2007. Soil compaction controls the abundance, biomass and distribution of earthworms in a single dairy farm in south-eastern Australia.Soil and Tillage Research, 94, 75-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curry J.P. 1998. Factors affecting earthworm abundance in soils. In: Earthworm Ecology (ed.: C.A. Edwards), Lucie Press, Boca Raton, 37-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curry J.P., Doherty P., Purvis G., Schmidt O. 2008.Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland. Applied Soil Ecology, 39, 58-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlgren R.A., Horwath W.R., Tate K.W., Camping T.J.2003. Blue oak enhance soil quality in California oak woodlands. California Agriculture, 57, 42-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dauda A., Samari A. 2002. Cowpea yield response to soil compaction under tractor traffic on a sandy loam soil in the semi-arid region of northern Nigeria.Soil and Tillage Research, 68, 17-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dinesh R., Ghoshal Chaudhuri S., Ganeshamurthy A.N., Dey C. 2003. Changes in soil microbial indices and their relationships following deforestation and cultivation in wet tropical forests. Applied Soil Ecology, 24, 17-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doran J.W., Parkin T.B. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment (eds.: J.W. Doran, D.C. Coleman, D.F. Bezdick, B.A. Stewart), Soil Science Society of America, Special Publication, No. 35, 3-21. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Doran J.W., Zeiss M.R. 2000. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality.Applied Soil Ecology, 15, 3-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Famiglietti J., Rudnicki J., Rodell M. 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect.Journal of Hydrology, 210, 259- 281.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fonte S.J., Winsome T., Six J. 2009. Earthworm populations in relation to soil organic matter dynamics and management in California tomato cropping systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 41, 206-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glanz J.T. 1995. Saving Our Soil: Solutions for Sustaining Earth’s Vital Resource. Johnson Books, Boulder, CO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habibpoor K., Safri R. 2012. A comprehensive guide to using the SPSS. Loya publication, Tehran.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haynes R.J., Dominy C.S., Graham M.H. 2003. Effect of agricultural land use on soil organic matter status and the composition of earthworm communities in Kwazulu-natal, South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Journal, 95, 453-464.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hendershot W.H., Duquette M. 1986. A simple bariumchloride method for determining cation-exchange capacity and exchangeable cations. Soil Science, 50, 605-608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hendrix P.F., Bonlen P.G. 2002. Exotic Earthworm invasions in North America: Ecological and policy implications. Bioscience, 9, 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Herrick J.E. 2000. Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? Applied Soil Ecology, 15, 75-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hseu Z.Y., Chen Z.S., Wu Z.D. 1999. Characterization of placic horizons in two subalpine forest Inceptisols.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63, 941-947.]Search in Google Scholar
[Islam K.R., Weil R.R. 2000. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79, 9-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jalilvand H., Kooch Y. 2012. Factors influence the distribution and abundance of earthworm communities in difference forest types man - made and natural forests. International Journal of Green and Herbal Chemistry, 1, 26-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalra Y.P., Maynard D.G. 1991. Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Canadian Forest Service, Alberta.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlen D.L., Ditzler C.A., Andrews S.S. 2003. Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma, 114, 145-156.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelemen K., Mihók B., Gálhidy L., Standovár T. 2012.Dynamic response of herbaceous vegetation to gap opening in a Central European beech stand. Silva Fennica, 46, 53-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Khaledian Y., Kiani F., Ebrahimi F., Movahedi Naeini A. 2011. Impact of forest degradation, changing land use and building villas on some indicators of soil quality in the watershed, Golestan province. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 18, 167-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kooch Y., Hosseini S.M., Mohammadi J., Hojjati S.M.2010. The Effects of Gap Disturbance on Soil Chemical and Biochemical Properties in a Mixed Beech - Hornbeam Forest of Iran. Ecologia Balkanika, 2, 39-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kouamé F.N., Bongers F., Poorter L., Traoré D. 2004.Climbers and logging in the Forêt Classée du Haut- Sassandra, Côte-d’Ivoire. Forest Ecology and Management, 194, 259-268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ladd J.N., Foster R.C., Skjemstad J.O. 1993. Soil structure: carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Geoderma, 56, 401-434.]Search in Google Scholar
[Linden D.R., Hendrix F.P., Colemen D.C., Vliet P.C.J.1994. Fauna indicators of soil quality. In: Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment (eds.: J.W. Doran, D.C. Coleman, D.F. Bezdicek, B.A. Stewart), SSSA Special Publication, 35, 91-103.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCune B., Mefford M.J. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marañón T., Ajbilou R., Ojeda F., Arroyo J. 1999. Biodiversity of woody species in oak woodlands of southern Spain and northern Morocco. Forest Ecology and Management, 115, 147-156.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maynard D.G., Kalra Y.P. 1993. Nitrate and exchangeable ammonium nitrogen. In: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (ed.: M.R. Carter), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 25-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mboukou-Kimbatsa I., Bernhard-Reversat F., Loumeto J.J., Ngao J., Lavelle P. 2007. Understory vegetation, soil structure and soil invertebrates in Congolese eucalypt plantations, with special reference to the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata and earthworm populations. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43, 48-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nachtergale L., Ghekiere K., De Schrijver A., Muys B., Luyssaert S., Lust N. 2002. Earthworm biomass and species diversity in windthrow sites of a temperate lowland forest. Pedobiologia, 46, 440-451.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nadiri S., Omrani G.A., Makki Ale Agha M., Emtyazjoo M. 2011. Determination of Biochemical Changes in Cow Manure During the Process of Vermicopost with the Usage of Earthearthworm (Eisenia Fetida).Advances in Environmental Biology, 5, 3624-3628.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemati F., Raiesi F., Hosseinpur A.R. 2011. The Study of Populations and Growth Characteristics of Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) in a Soil Salinized with NaCl and the Importance of Organic Amendments in Alleviating Salinity Effects. Journal of Water and Soil, 24, 1097-1108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nurhidayati, Arisoesilaningsih E., Suprayogo D., Hairiah K. 2011. Long-Term Impact of Conventional Soil Management to Earthworm Diversity and Density On Sugarcane Plantation in East Java, Indonesia.Journal of Nature Studies, 10, 16-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owojori O.J., Reinecke A.J. 2009. Avoidance behaviour of two eco-physiologically different earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Aporrectodea caliginosa) in natural and artificial saline soils. Chemosphere, 75, 279-283.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owojori O.J., Reinecke A.J., Rozanov A.B. 2009. The combined stress effects of salinity and copper on the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Applied Soil Ecology, 41, 277-285.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poier K.R., Richter J. 1992. Spatial distribution of earthworms and soil properties in an arable loess soil.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24, 1601-1608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rashidi M., Seilsepour M. 2008. Modeling of soil cation exchange capacity based on Soil organic carbon.Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 3, 41-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reich P.B., Oleksyn J., Modrzynski, J., Mrozinski P., Hobbie S.E., Eissenstat D.M., Chorover J., Chadwick O.A., Hale C.M., Tjoelker M.G. 2005. Linking litter calcium, earthearthworm and soil properties: A common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecology Letters, 8, 811-818.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rombke J.S., Diden W. 2005. The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.Forest Ecology and Management, 41, 42-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salehi A., Mohammadi A., Safari A. 2011. Investigation and comparison of physical and chemical soil properties and quantitative characteristics of trees in less-damaged and damaged area of Zagross forests (Case study: Poldokhtar, Lorestan province).Iranian Journal of Forest, 3, 81-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sautter K.D., Brown C.G., James S.W., Pasini D.H., Nunesand N., Benito P. 2006. Present knowledge on earthworm biodiversity in the state of Parana, Brazil. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, 296-300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shaoshan A., Zheng F., Zhang F., Pelt V., Hamer V., Makeschin F. 2008. Soil quality degradation processes along a deforestation chronosequence in the Ziwuling area, China. Catena, 75, 248-256.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sommers L.E., Nelson D.W. 1997. Determination of total phosphorus in soils: A rapid percholoric acid digestion procedure. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 36, 902-904.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sumner M.E., Miller W.P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods (ed.: D.L. Sparks), Soil Science Society of America.Book Series 5, Madison, Wis., 1202-1229.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tondoh J., Monin L., Tiho S., Csuzdi C. 2007. Can earthworms be used as bio-indicators of land-use perturbations in semi-deciduous forest. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43, 585-592.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tondoh J.E., Guei A.M., Csuzdi C., Okoth P. 2011. Effect of land-use on the earthworm assemblages insemi-deciduous forests of Central-West Ivory Coast. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 169-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsukamoto J., Sabang J. 2005. Soil macro-fauna in an Acacia mangium plantation in comparison to that in a primary mixed dipterocarp forest in the lowlands of Sarawak, Malaysia. Pedobiologia, 49, 69-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Dang M. 2007. Quantitative and qualitative soil quality assessments oftea enterprises in Northern Vietnam. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2, 455-462.]Search in Google Scholar
[Welke S.E., Parkinson D. 2003. Effect of Aporrectodea trapezoides activity on seedling, growth of Pseudotsuga menziesii nutrient dynamics and microbial activity in different forest soils. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 173, 169-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zandebasiri M., Ghazanfari M., Sepahvand H., Fatehi P. 2010. Presentation of decision making pattern for forest management unit under uncertainty conditions (Case study: Taf local area-Lorestan ]Search in Google Scholar
