Features of the Application of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Courts in Tax Cases

Babin, I. I. (2016). The modern system of local taxes and fees of Ukraine. Societas et Iurusprudentia, IV (3), 21–40.BabinI. I.2016The modern system of local taxes and fees of UkraineSocietas et IurusprudentiaIV32140Search in Google Scholar

Babin, I. I. (2018). Tax Law: Textbook. Kyiv: Kondor.BabinI. I.2018Tax Law: TextbookKyivKondorSearch in Google Scholar

Code of Administrative Justice of Ukraine. BVR. 2005, No. 35–36, No. 37, item 446, as subsequently amended.Code of Administrative Justice of UkraineBVR. 2005, No. 35–36, No. 37, item 446, as subsequently amendedSearch in Google Scholar

Constitution of Ukraine. BVR. 1996, No. 30, item 141, as subsequently amended.Constitution of UkraineBVR. 1996, No. 30, item 141, as subsequently amendedSearch in Google Scholar

Criminal Code of Ukraine. BVR. 2001, No. 25–26, item 131, as subsequently amended.Criminal Code of UkraineBVR. 2001, No. 25–26, item 131, as subsequently amendedSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Bulves AD v. Bulgaria. App. No. 3991/03, January 22, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRBulves AD v. BulgariaApp. No. 3991/03, January 22, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Burden v. The United Kingdom. App. No. 13378/05, April 29, 2008. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRBurden v. The United KingdomApp. No. 13378/05, April 29, 2008. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Feldman v. Ukraine. App. No. 76556/01 and 38779/04, April 08, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRFeldman v. UkraineApp. No. 76556/01 and 38779/04, April 08, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Ferrazzini v. Italy. App. No. 44759/98, July 12, 2001. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRFerrazzini v. ItalyApp. No. 44759/98, July 12, 2001. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. J. B. v. Switzerland. App. No. 31827/96, May 03, 2001. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRJ. B. v. SwitzerlandApp. No. 31827/96, May 03, 2001. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Janosevic v. Sweden. App. No. 34619/97, July 23, 2002. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRJanosevic v. SwedenApp. No. 34619/97, July 23, 2002. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Jussila v. Finland. App. No. 73053/01, November 23, 2006. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRJussila v. FinlandApp. No. 73053/01, November 23, 2006. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Kadri v. France. App. No. 41715/98, March 27, 2001. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRKadri v. FranceApp. No. 41715/98, March 27, 2001. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Kurt Nielsen v. Denmark. App. No. 33488/96, February 15, 2000. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRKurt Nielsen v. DenmarkApp. No. 33488/96, February 15, 2000. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Matsyuk v. Ukraine. App. No. 1751/03, December 10, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRMatsyuk v. UkraineApp. No. 1751/03, December 10, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Merit v. Ukraine. App. No. 66561/01, March 30, 2004. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRMerit v. UkraineApp. No. 66561/01, March 30, 2004. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Mooren v. Germany. App. No. 11364/03, Grand Chamber, July 09, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRMooren v. GermanyApp. No. 11364/03, Grand Chamber, July 09, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Rakitin v. Ukraine. Appl. No. 7675/04, January 11, 2007. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRRakitin v. UkraineAppl. No. 7675/04, January 11, 2007. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Serkov v. Ukraine. App. No. 39766/05, July 07, 2011. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRSerkov v. UkraineApp. No. 39766/05, July 07, 2011. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Shchokin v. Ukraine. App. No. 23759/03 and 37943/06, October 14, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRShchokin v. UkraineApp. No. 23759/03 and 37943/06, October 14, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Smirnov v. Ukraine. App. No. 1409/03, July 30, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRSmirnov v. UkraineApp. No. 1409/03, July 30, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Sokor v. Ukraine. App. No. 49009/07, December 09, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRSokor v. UkraineApp. No. 49009/07, December 09, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Terem LTD, Chechetkin and Olius v. Ukraine. App. No. 70297/01, October 18, 2005. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRTerem LTD, Chechetkin and Olius v. UkraineApp. No. 70297/01, October 18, 2005. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Västberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulic v. Sweden. App. No. 36985/97, July 23, 2002. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRVästberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulic v. SwedenApp. No. 36985/97, July 23, 2002. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Vergelskiy v. Ukraine. App. No. 19312/06, March 12, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRVergelskiy v. UkraineApp. No. 19312/06, March 12, 2009. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

ECtHR. Von Sydow v. Sweden. App. No. 11464/85, October 08, 1987. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.ECtHRVon Sydow v. SwedenApp. No. 11464/85, October 08, 1987. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950), as amended by Additional Protocols. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms1950as amended by Additional ProtocolsRetrieved January 11, 2020, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.intSearch in Google Scholar

Law of Ukraine “On Enforcement of Decisions and Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights”. BVR. 2006, No. 30, item 260.Law of Ukraine “On Enforcement of Decisions and Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights”. BVR. 2006, No. 30, item 260Search in Google Scholar

Law of Ukraine “On International Treaties”. BVR. 2004, No. 50, item 540, as subsequently amended.Law of Ukraine “On International Treaties”. BVR. 2004, No. 50, item 540, as subsequently amendedSearch in Google Scholar

Law of Ukraine “On Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols No 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention”. BVR. 1997, No. 40, item 263.Law of Ukraine “On Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols No 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention”. BVR. 1997, No. 40, item 263Search in Google Scholar

Mahrelo, M. (2013). A non-binding precedent: some aspects of the substance of the European Court of Human Rights decisions in the legal system of continental law. Bulletin of the Academy of the Bar of Ukraine, 3, 61–67.MahreloM.2013A non-binding precedent: some aspects of the substance of the European Court of Human Rights decisions in the legal system of continental lawBulletin of the Academy of the Bar of Ukraine36167Search in Google Scholar

Mazur, M. V., Tahiiev, S. R., Benitskyi, A. S., Kostrytskyi, V. V. (2006). Interpretation and application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the European Court of Human Rights and the Courts of Ukraine. Luhansk: RVV LDUVS.MazurM. V.TahiievS.R.BenitskyiA. S.KostrytskyiV. V.2006Interpretation and application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the European Court of Human Rights and the Courts of UkraineLuhanskRVV LDUVSSearch in Google Scholar

Onopenko, V. V. (2011). The Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights in Ukraine Needs Substantial Improvement (Presentation at the International Conference). Law of Ukraine, 7, 64–68.OnopenkoV. V.2011The Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights in Ukraine Needs Substantial Improvement (Presentation at the International Conference)Law of Ukraine76468Search in Google Scholar

Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine “On decision in administrative case”. May 20, 2013, No. 7. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0007760-13.Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine “On decision in administrative case”May 20, 2013, No. 7. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0007760-13Search in Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On invalidation and cancellation of tax notification-decision and tax claim”. January 18, 2018, No. K/9901/1648/17, No. 804/1241/17. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/71692-929.Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On invalidation and cancellation of tax notification-decision and tax claim”January 18, 2018, No. K/9901/1648/17, No. 804/1241/17. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/71692-929Search in Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On invalidation and cancellation of tax notification-decision”. January 31, 2011, No. 826/14268/14. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/14222189.Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On invalidation and cancellation of tax notification-decision”January 31, 2011, No. 826/14268/14. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/14222189Search in Google Scholar

Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On invalidation and cancellation of tax notification-decision”. June 14, 2016, No. 21-42a10. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/58789047.Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine “On invalidation and cancellation of tax notification-decision”June 14, 2016, No. 21-42a10. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/58789047Search in Google Scholar

Sadchikova, O. V. (2009). Decisions of the ECHR and their significance for the Russian law enforcement practice: abstract. diss. . . . cand. legal sciences. Moskow: Mosk. gos. in-t mezhdunar. otnoshenij.SadchikovaO. V.2009Decisions of the ECHR and their significance for the Russian law enforcement practice: abstract. diss. . . . cand. legal sciencesMoskowMosk. gos. in-t mezhdunar. otnoshenijSearch in Google Scholar

State Judicial Administration of Ukraine. (2016). Separate Opinion of Judge of the Trial Chamber in Administrative Matters of the Supreme Court of Ukraine Samsin I. L. regarding the resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of June 14, 2016 in the case of the claim of LLC “Porcelain-Faience” to the STI in the Shevchenkivsky district of the State Tax Service of Ukraine in Kyiv on the recognition of illegal and annulment of tax notices-decisions of 14.06.2016, 21-42a10. Retrieved January 12, 2020, from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/58874624#.State Judicial Administration of Ukraine.2016Separate Opinion of Judge of the Trial Chamber in Administrative Matters of the Supreme Court of Ukraine Samsin I. L. regarding the resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of June 14, 2016 in the case of the claim of LLC “Porcelain-Faience” to the STI in the Shevchenkivsky district of the State Tax Service of Ukraine in Kyiv on the recognition of illegal and annulment of tax notices-decisions of 14.06.2016, 21-42a10Retrieved January 12, 2020, from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/58874624#Search in Google Scholar

Tax Code of Ukraine. BVR. 2011, No. 13–14, No. 15–16, No. 17, item 112, as subsequently amended.Tax Code of UkraineBVR. 2011, No. 13–14, No. 15–16, No. 17, item 112, as subsequently amendedSearch in Google Scholar

Timchenko, L. D. (2004). International Law: Textbook, stereotyped (3rd ed). Kharkiv: Konsul; Nacz. un-t vnutr. del.TimchenkoL. D.2004International Law: Textbook, stereotyped3rd edKharkivKonsul; Nacz. un-t vnutr. delSearch in Google Scholar

Vaško, A. (2019). Intelligence Information within Criminal Proceedings. DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review, 10(3), 267–283.VaškoA.2019Intelligence Information within Criminal ProceedingsDANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review10326728310.2478/danb-2019-0014Search in Google Scholar

Yudkivska, A.Iu. (2011). Some Issues in the Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, 7, 74–79.YudkivskaA.Iu2011Some Issues in the Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights in UkraineLaw of Ukraine77479Search in Google Scholar