Conceptual Framework and Empirical Methodology for Measuring Multidimensional Judicial Ideology

Alarie, R. D. B., Green, J. A. (2008). Should They All Just Get Along? Judicial Ideology, Collegiality, and Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 53, 73–91.AlarieR. D. B.GreenJ. A.2008Should They All Just Get Along? Judicial Ideology, Collegiality, and Appointments to the Supreme Court of CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick Law Journal53739110.2139/ssrn.1091479Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, S. G. (2002). Comparing the Two Legal Realisms – American and Scandinavian. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, 131–174.AlexanderS. G.2002Comparing the Two Legal Realisms – American and ScandinavianThe American Journal of Comparative Law5013117410.2307/840832Search in Google Scholar

Alexy, R., Adler, R., MacCormick, N. (2009). Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.AlexyR.AdlerR.MacCormickN.2009Theory of Legal ArgumentationOxfordOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Altemeyer, R. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.AltemeyerR.1981Right-Wing AuthoritarianismWinnipeg, CanadaUniversity of Manitoba PressSearch in Google Scholar

Azizi, J. (2011). Unveiling the EU Courts’ Internal Decision-Making Process: A Case for Dissenting Opinions? ERA Forum, 12, 49–68.AziziJ.2011Unveiling the EU Courts’ Internal Decision-Making Process: A Case for Dissenting Opinions?ERA Forum12496810.1007/s12027-011-0209-9Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, A. M. (2016). Measuring Ideology on the Courts. In Howard, R. M., Randazzo K.A. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior. New York: Routledge.BaileyA. M.2016Measuring Ideology on the CourtsHowardR. M.RandazzoK.A.(eds.)Routledge Handbook of Judicial BehaviorNew YorkRoutledge10.4324/9781315691527-5Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, A. M., Maltzman, F. (2008). Does Legal Doctrine Matter: Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 102, 369–384.BaileyA. M.MaltzmanF.2008Does Legal Doctrine Matter: Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme CourtAmerican Political Science Review10236938410.1017/S0003055408080283Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, A. M., Maltzman, F. (2011). The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make. Princeton: Princeton University Press.BaileyA. M.MaltzmanF.2011The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices MakePrincetonPrinceton University Press10.1515/9781400840267Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, A. M. (2013). Is Today's Court the Most Conservative in Sixty Years? Challenges and Opportunities in Measuring Judicial Preferences. Journal of Politics, 75, 821–834.BaileyA. M.2013Is Today's Court the Most Conservative in Sixty Years? Challenges and Opportunities in Measuring Judicial PreferencesJournal of Politics7582183410.1017/S0022381613000443Search in Google Scholar

Bjarup, J. (2005). The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal Realism. Ratio Juris, 18(1), 1–15.BjarupJ.2005The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal RealismRatio Juris18111510.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00282.xSearch in Google Scholar

Blanes i Vidal, J., Leaver, C. (2011). Are Tenured Judges Insulated from Political Pressure? Journal of Public Economics, 95, 570–586.Blanes i VidalJ.LeaverC.2011Are Tenured Judges Insulated from Political Pressure?Journal of Public Economics9557058610.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Blanes i Vidal, J., Leaver C. (2013). Social Interactions and the Content of Legal Opinions. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29, 78–114.Blanes i VidalJ.LeaverC.2013Social Interactions and the Content of Legal OpinionsJournal of Law, Economics and Organization297811410.1093/jleo/ews013Search in Google Scholar

Bricker, B. (2017). Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts. Law & Policy, 39(2), 170–191.BrickerB.2017Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional CourtsLaw & Policy39217019110.1111/lapo.12072Search in Google Scholar

Brouard, S. (2010). The Study of Judicial Politics in France. French Politics, 8, 72–76.BrouardS.2010The Study of Judicial Politics in FranceFrench Politics8727610.1057/fp.2009.33Search in Google Scholar

Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M.J., Wagner, M.W. (2012). Political Ideology in American Politics: One, Two, or None? The Forum, 10(4), 1–18.CarminesE. G.EnsleyM.J.WagnerM.W.2012Political Ideology in American Politics: One, Two, or None?The Forum10411810.1515/1540-8884.1526Search in Google Scholar

Carrubba, J. C., Gabel, M., Hankla, C. (2008). Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 435–452.CarrubbaJ. C.GabelM.HanklaC.2008Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of JusticeAmerican Political Science Review102443545210.1017/S0003055408080350Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, T. J., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, R. J., Motyl, M. (2017). Social and Economic Ideologies Differentially Predict Prejudice across the Political Spectrum, but Social Issues are Most Divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 383–412.CrawfordT. J.BrandtM. J.InbarY.ChambersR. J.MotylM.2017Social and Economic Ideologies Differentially Predict Prejudice across the Political Spectrum, but Social Issues are Most DivisiveJournal of Personality and Social Psychology112338341210.1037/pspa0000074Search in Google Scholar

Dalla Pellegrina, L., Garoupa, N., Gomez-Pomar, F. (2014). Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The Case of Administrative Review. International Review of Law and Economics, 52(C), 16–28.Dalla PellegrinaL.GaroupaN.Gomez-PomarF.2014Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The Case of Administrative ReviewInternational Review of Law and Economics52C162810.2139/ssrn.2469883Search in Google Scholar

Dalla Pellegrina, L., De Mot, J., Faure, M., Garoupa, N. (2017). Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court Decisions. European Constitutional Law Review, 13(2), 305–346.Dalla PellegrinaL.De MotJ.FaureM.GaroupaN.2017Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court DecisionsEuropean Constitutional Law Review13230534610.1017/S1574019617000050Search in Google Scholar

Dalla Pelegrina, L., Garoupa, N. (2018). Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in a Bidimensional Court. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies in Europe, Leuven.Dalla PelegrinaL.GaroupaN.2018Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in a Bidimensional CourtPaper presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies in EuropeLeuven10.2139/ssrn.3100214Search in Google Scholar

Duckitt, J., Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130.DuckittJ.SibleyC. G.2007Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudiceEuropean Journal of Personality21211313010.1002/per.614Search in Google Scholar

Dunoff, L. J., Pollack, M. A. (2015). International Judicial Dissent: Causes and Consequences. Retrieved June 10, 2019, from https://eustudies.org/conference/papers/download/84, 1–41.DunoffL. J.PollackM. A.2015International Judicial Dissent: Causes and ConsequencesRetrieved June 10, 2019, from https://eustudies.org/conference/papers/download/84141Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. Law's Empire. (1986). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.DworkinR.Law's Empire1986CambridgeHarvard University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. Justice for Hedgehogs. (2013). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.DworkinR.Justice for Hedgehogs2013CambridgeHarvard University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Epstein, L., Landes, W., Posner, R. A. (2013). The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.EpsteinL.LandesW.PosnerR. A.2013The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational ChoiceCambridgeHarvard University Press10.4159/harvard.9780674067325Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, T., Fisher, T., Rosen-Zvi, I. (2013). Group Decision Making on Appellate Panels: Presiding Justice and Opinion Justice Influence in the Israel Supreme Court. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 282–296.EisenbergT.FisherT.Rosen-ZviI.2013Group Decision Making on Appellate Panels: Presiding Justice and Opinion Justice Influence in the Israel Supreme CourtPsychology, Public Policy, and Law1928229610.1037/a0033565Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa, R. (2013). Constitutional Judicial Behavior: Exploring the Determinants of the Decisions of the French Constitutional Court. Review of Law and Economics, 13(2), 1–37.EspinosaR.2013Constitutional Judicial Behavior: Exploring the Determinants of the Decisions of the French Constitutional CourtReview of Law and Economics13213710.1515/rle-2015-0034Search in Google Scholar

Evans, G., Heath, A., Lalljee, M. (1996). Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoriarian Values in the British Electorate. British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 93–112.EvansG.HeathA.LalljeeM.1996Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoriarian Values in the British ElectorateBritish Journal of Sociology4719311210.2307/591118Search in Google Scholar

Everett, A. C. J. (2013). The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1–11.EverettA. C. J.2013The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS)PLoS ONE81211110.1371/journal.pone.0082131Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, P. F. A. N., Muller, B. (2014). How Judges Think in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Estimating ideal points and identifying dimensions. Economia, 15, 275–293.FerreiraP. F. A. N.MullerB.2014How Judges Think in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Estimating ideal points and identifying dimensionsEconomia1527529310.1016/j.econ.2014.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Fiorino, N., Padovano, F., Sgarra, G. (2007). The Determinants of Judicial Independence: Evidence from the Italian Constitutional Court (1956–2002). Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 163, 683–705.FiorinoN.PadovanoF.SgarraG.2007The Determinants of Judicial Independence: Evidence from the Italian Constitutional Court (1956–2002)Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics16368370510.1628/093245607783242927Search in Google Scholar

Fischman, B. J., Law, D. S. (2009). What is Judicial Ideology, and How do we Measure it? Washington Journal of Law and Policy, 29, 133–213.FischmanB. J.LawD. S.2009What is Judicial Ideology, and How do we Measure it?Washington Journal of Law and Policy29133213Search in Google Scholar

Fischman, B. J., Jacobi, T. (2016). The Second Dimension of the Supreme Court. William & Mary Law Review, 75, 1671–1715.FischmanB. J.JacobiT.2016The Second Dimension of the Supreme CourtWilliam & Mary Law Review751671171510.2139/ssrn.2649427Search in Google Scholar

Franck, R. (2009). Judicial Independence under a Divided Polity: A Study of the Rulings of the French Constitutional Court, 1959–2006. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 25, 262–284.FranckR.2009Judicial Independence under a Divided Polity: A Study of the Rulings of the French Constitutional Court, 1959–2006Journal of Law, Economics and Organization2526228410.1093/jleo/ewn001Search in Google Scholar

Garoupa, N. (2011). “Empirical Legal Studies and Constitutional Courts”. The Indiana Journal of Constitutional Law, 5, 26–54.GaroupaN.2011“Empirical Legal Studies and Constitutional Courts”The Indiana Journal of Constitutional Law52654Search in Google Scholar

Garoupa, N., Gómez-Pomar, F., Grembi, V. (2013). Judging Politically: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Spanish Constitutional Court. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29, 513–534.GaroupaN.Gómez-PomarF.GrembiV.2013Judging Politically: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Spanish Constitutional CourtJournal of Law, Economics and Organization2951353410.1093/jleo/ewr008Search in Google Scholar

Garoupa, N., Grembi, V. (2015). Judicial Review and Political Partisanship: Moving from Consensual to Majoritarian Democracy. International Review of Law and Economics, 43, 32–45.GaroupaN.GrembiV.2015Judicial Review and Political Partisanship: Moving from Consensual to Majoritarian DemocracyInternational Review of Law and Economics43324510.1016/j.irle.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Garoupa, N. (2016). “Constitutional Review.” Retrieved June 10, 2019, from: economix.fr/pdf/workshops/2016_3rd_law_eco/NGaroupa.pdf.GaroupaN.2016“Constitutional Review.”Retrieved June 10, 2019, from: economix.fr/pdf/workshops/2016_3rd_law_eco/NGaroupa.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ginsburg, R. B. (2010). The Role of Dissenting Opinions. Minnesota Law Review, 95(1), 1–8.GinsburgR. B.2010The Role of Dissenting OpinionsMinnesota Law Review95118Search in Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. (2011). Building Reputation in Constitutional Courts: Political and Judicial Audiences. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 28(3), 539–568.GinsburgT.2011Building Reputation in Constitutional Courts: Political and Judicial AudiencesArizona Journal of International and Comparative Law283539568Search in Google Scholar

Grendstad, G., Shaffer, W. R., Waltenburg, E. N. (2015). Policy Making in an Independent Judiciary: The Norwegian Supreme Court. Colchester: ECPR Press Monographs.GrendstadG.ShafferW. R.WaltenburgE. N.2015Policy Making in an Independent Judiciary: The Norwegian Supreme CourtColchesterECPR Press MonographsSearch in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms, Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.HabermasJ.1996Between Facts and Norms, Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and DemocracyCambridgeMIT Press10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., Graham, J., Craig, J. (2009). Above and Below Left-Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110–119.HaidtJ.GrahamJ.CraigJ.2009Above and Below Left-Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral FoundationsPsychological Inquiry2011011910.1080/10478400903028573Search in Google Scholar

Hanretty, C. (2012a). The Decisions and Ideal Points of British Law Lords. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 703–716.HanrettyC.2012aThe Decisions and Ideal Points of British Law LordsBritish Journal of Political Science4370371610.1017/S0007123412000270Search in Google Scholar

Hanretty, C. (2012b). Dissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 671–692.HanrettyC.2012bDissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional TribunalsEuropean Journal of Political Research5167169210.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02056.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hanretty, C. (2014). The Bulgarian Constitutional Court as an Additional Legislative Chamber. East European Politics and Societies, 28, 540–558.HanrettyC.2014The Bulgarian Constitutional Court as an Additional Legislative ChamberEast European Politics and Societies2854055810.1177/0888325414530149Search in Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.HartH. L. A.1961The Concept of LawOxfordClarendon PressSearch in Google Scholar

Hönnige, C. (2009). The Electoral Connection: How the Pivotal Judge Affects Oppositional Success in European Constitutional Courts. West European Politics, 35, 963–984.HönnigeC.2009The Electoral Connection: How the Pivotal Judge Affects Oppositional Success in European Constitutional CourtsWest European Politics3596398410.1080/01402380903064937Search in Google Scholar

Iaryczower, M., Katz, G. (2016). More than Politics: Ability and Ideology in the British Appellate Committee. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 32, 61–93.IaryczowerM.KatzG.2016More than Politics: Ability and Ideology in the British Appellate CommitteeJournal of Law, Economics and Organization32619310.1093/jleo/ewv009Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, N. (2014). The Dimensional Structure of Symbolic Ideology: An Experiment on Liberal-Conservative Self-Placements. Retrieved June 10 from http://www.tess-experiments.org/data/jackson002.html.JacksonN.2014The Dimensional Structure of Symbolic Ideology: An Experiment on Liberal-Conservative Self-PlacementsRetrieved June 10 from http://www.tess-experiments.org/data/jackson002.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., Napier, J. L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L.2009Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective AffinitiesAnnual Review of Psychology6030733710.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600Search in Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, J., Garoupa, N. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal 2003–2013. Constitutional Political Economy, 27, 66–92.KantorowiczJ.GaroupaN.2016An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal 2003–2013Constitutional Political Economy27669210.1007/s10602-015-9200-8Search in Google Scholar

Kay, A. C., Jost, T. J. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837.KayA. C.JostT. J.2003Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motiveJournal of Personality and Social Psychology85582383710.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823Search in Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.KelsenH.1967Pure Theory of LawBerkeleyUniversity of California Press10.1525/9780520312296Search in Google Scholar

Klar, S. (2014). A Multidimensional Study of Ideological Preferences and Priorities among the American Public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 334–359.KlarS.2014A Multidimensional Study of Ideological Preferences and Priorities among the American PublicPublic Opinion Quarterly78133435910.1093/poq/nfu010Search in Google Scholar

Klein, D., Lindquist, S. A. (2012). Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(1), 129–148.KleinD.LindquistS. A.2012Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme CourtJournal of Empirical Legal Studies9112914810.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01249.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kozinski, A. (1993). What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review, 26, 993–1000.KozinskiA.1993What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision MakingLoyola Los Angeles Law Review26993100010.4135/9781071800942.n7Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, N. P., Smyth, R. (2007). What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach. (2007). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 401–425.KumarN. P.SmythR.2007What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach. (2007)Journal of Empirical Legal Studies440142510.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00093.xSearch in Google Scholar

Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies. Political Behavior, 24, 199–236.LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.2002Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel StudiesPolitical Behavior2419923610.1023/A:1021820523983Search in Google Scholar

Leiter, B. (2010). Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue? University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, 320, 1–31.LeiterB.2010Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue?University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper32013110.1017/S1352325210000121Search in Google Scholar

Maddox, W. S., Lilie, S. A. (1984). Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Reassessing the Political Spectrum. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.MaddoxW. S.LilieS. A.1984Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Reassessing the Political SpectrumWashington, D.C.Cato InstituteSearch in Google Scholar

Malecki, M. (2009). Judicial Behavior behind Mask and Shield: Modelling the European Court of Justice. Paper prepared for the 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.MaleckiM.2009Judicial Behavior behind Mask and Shield: Modelling the European Court of JusticePaper prepared for the 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science AssociationSearch in Google Scholar

Malecki, M. (2012). Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambers. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 59–75.MaleckiM.2012Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambersJournal of European Public Policy191597510.1080/13501763.2012.632143Search in Google Scholar

MacCormick, N. (2007). Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.MacCormickN.2007Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal TheoryOxfordOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mannheim, K. (1966). Ideology and Utopia: an Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.MannheimK.1966Ideology and Utopia: an Introduction to the Sociology of KnowledgeLondonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, M. E., Ducat, C. L. (2002). Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991–1995. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 242–49.OstbergC. L.WetsteinM. E.DucatC. L.2002Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991–1995Political Research Quarterly552424910.1177/106591290205500110Search in Google Scholar

Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, M. E. (2007). Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.OstbergC. L.WetsteinM. E.2007Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of CanadaVancouverUniversity of British Columbia PressSearch in Google Scholar

Padovano, F. (2009). The Time-Varying Independence of Italian Peak Judicial Institutions. Constitutional Political Economy, 20, 230–250.PadovanoF.2009The Time-Varying Independence of Italian Peak Judicial InstitutionsConstitutional Political Economy2023025010.1007/s10602-008-9067-zSearch in Google Scholar

Pavčnik, M. (2013). Argumentacija v pravu. Ljubljana: GV Založba.PavčnikM.2013Argumentacija v pravuLjubljanaGV ZaložbaSearch in Google Scholar

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741.PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F.1994Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology6774110.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741Search in Google Scholar

Posner, E., de Figueiredo, M. (2004). Is the International Court of Justice Biased? John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper, 234, 1–44.PosnerE.de FigueiredoM.2004Is the International Court of Justice Biased?John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper234144Search in Google Scholar

Raffaeli, R. (2012). Study of Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member States. Brussels: European Parliament.RaffaeliR.2012Study of Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member StatesBrusselsEuropean ParliamentSearch in Google Scholar

Raz, J. (2009). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.RazJ.2009The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and MoralityOxfordOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Robertson, D. (1982). “Judicial Ideology in the House of Lords: A Jurimetic Analysis”. British Journal of Political Science, 12, 1–25.RobertsonD.1982“Judicial Ideology in the House of Lords: A Jurimetic Analysis”British Journal of Political Science1212510.1017/S0007123400002799Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, D. (2010). The Judge as Political Theorist. Princeton: Princeton University Press.RobertsonD.2010The Judge as Political TheoristPrincetonPrinceton University Press10.1515/9781400836871Search in Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.RokeachM.1973The Nature of Human ValuesNew YorkFree PressSearch in Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M. (2006). Comparing constitutional review by the European Court of Justice and the U.S. Supreme Court. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4(4), 618–651.RosenfeldM.2006Comparing constitutional review by the European Court of Justice and the U.S. Supreme CourtInternational Journal of Constitutional Law4461865110.1093/icon/mol027Search in Google Scholar

Santoni, M, Zucchini, F. (2003). Legislative Output and the Constitutional Court in Italy. Constitutional Political Economy, 17, 165–187.SantoniMZucchiniF.2003Legislative Output and the Constitutional Court in ItalyConstitutional Political Economy1716518710.1007/s10602-006-9003-zSearch in Google Scholar

Schubert, A. G. (1965). The Judicial Mind: the Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.SchubertA. G.1965The Judicial Mind: the Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963EvanstonNorthwestern University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452.SchwartzS. H.CapraraG. V.VecchioneM.2010Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysisPolitical Psychology3142145210.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shachar, Y, Gross, M., Harris, R. (1997). Anatomy of Discourse and Dissent in the Supreme Court – Quantitative Analyses. Tel Aviv University Law Review, 20, 749–795.ShacharYGrossM.HarrisR.1997Anatomy of Discourse and Dissent in the Supreme Court – Quantitative AnalysesTel Aviv University Law Review20749795Search in Google Scholar

Songer, R. D., Johnson, S. W., Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, M. E. (2012). Law, Ideology and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.SongerR. D.JohnsonS. W.OstbergC. L.WetsteinM. E.2012Law, Ideology and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of CanadaMontrealMcGill-Queens University Press10.1515/9780773587496Search in Google Scholar

Spitzer, M., Talley, E. (2013). Left, Right and Center: Strategic Information Acquisition and Diversity in Judicial Panels. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(3), 638–680.SpitzerM.TalleyE.2013Left, Right and Center: Strategic Information Acquisition and Diversity in Judicial PanelsThe Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization29363868010.1093/jleo/ewr013Search in Google Scholar

Swedlow, B. (2008). Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Two-dimensional Conceptions of Ideology and the Structure of Political Attitudes and Values. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 157–180.SwedlowB.2008Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Two-dimensional Conceptions of Ideology and the Structure of Political Attitudes and ValuesJournal of Political Ideologies1315718010.1080/13569310802075969Search in Google Scholar

Swedlow, B., Wyckoff, M. L. (2009). Value Preferences and Ideological Structuring of Attitudes in American Public Opinion. American Politics Research, 37, 1048–1087.SwedlowB.WyckoffM. L.2009Value Preferences and Ideological Structuring of Attitudes in American Public OpinionAmerican Politics Research371048108710.1177/1532673X09333959Search in Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Z. B. (2009). Beyond the Realist-Formalist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.TamanahaZ. B.2009Beyond the Realist-Formalist Divide: The Role of Politics in JudgingPrincetonPrinceton University Press10.1515/9781400831982Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, M., Ellis, R., Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.ThompsonM.EllisR.WildavskyA.1990Cultural TheoryBoulder, COWestview PressSearch in Google Scholar

Toplak, J. (2016). Judicial Behavior on the European Court of Human Rights. ECPR General Conference, Prague.ToplakJ.2016Judicial Behavior on the European Court of Human RightsECPR General ConferencePragueSearch in Google Scholar

Treier, S., Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 679–703.TreierS.HillygusD. S.2009The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary ElectoratePublic Opinion Quarterly7367970310.1093/poq/nfp067Search in Google Scholar

Vanberg, G. (2005). The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.VanbergG.2005The Politics of Constitutional Review in GermanyCambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511510427Search in Google Scholar

Voeten, E. (2008). The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 417–433.VoetenE.2008The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human RightsAmerican Political Science Review102441743310.1017/S0003055408080398Search in Google Scholar

Volcansek, L. M. (2000). Constitutional Politics in Italy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Press.VolcansekL. M.2000Constitutional Politics in ItalyBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan PressSearch in Google Scholar

Weinshall-Margel, K. (2011). Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 556–586.Weinshall-MargelK.2011Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from IsraelJournal of Empirical Legal Studies855658610.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01220.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wetstein, E. M., Ostberg, C. L., Songer, D., Johnson, S. (2009). Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conflict: A Comparison of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 763–792.WetsteinE. M.OstbergC. L.SongerD.JohnsonS.2009Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conflict: A Comparison of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme CourtsComparative Political Studies4276379210.1177/0010414008329897Search in Google Scholar