Conditions for a Dialogue of Local Community and Genius Loci

1. International Association for Public Participation, 2007 [online], IAP2 Core Values [cited 07.09.2018]. http://www.iap2.org/Search in Google Scholar

2. Irvin, R., Stansbury, J. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 2004, No. 64, Issue 1, pp. 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Kreiken, W. Introduction of public participation, 2008 [online, cited 04.07.2018]. https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/citizen%20participation%20is%20it%20worth%20the%20effort.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

4. Freidenberg, O. Mif i literatura drevnosti. Moskva: Nauka (Фрейденберг, О. Миф и литература древности. Mосква: Наука), 1978. 608 р.Search in Google Scholar

5. Bajburin, A.Semiotičeskie aspekty funkcionirovanija vešej. Ètnografičeskoe izučenie znakovyh sredstv kultury. Leningrad: Nauka (Бай-бурин, А. Семиотические аспекты функционирования вещей. Эт-нографическое изучение знаковых средств культуры. Ленинград: Наука), 1989, рp. 63–88.Search in Google Scholar

6. Norberg-Schulz, C.Genius loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli, 1984. 216 p.Search in Google Scholar

7. Maturana, H., Varela, F. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 42. New York: Springer Publishing, 1980. 171 p. 10.1007/978-94-009-8947-410.1007/978-94-009-8947-4Search in Google Scholar

8. Aršinov, V., Lepskij, V. (eds.). Problemy subjektov v postneklassičeskoj nauke. Moskva: Kogito-Centr (Аршинов, В., Лепский, В. (редакторы). Проблемы субъектов в постнеклассической науке. Москва: Когито-Центр), 2007. 176 p.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lepik, P.Universals in the context of Juri Lotman’s semiotics. Tartu: University Press, 2008. 269 p.Search in Google Scholar

10. Pjatigorskij, A.Neprekraŝaemyj razgovor. SPb.: Azbuka-klassika (Пятигорский, А. Непрекращаемый разговор. СПб.: Азбука-классика), 2004. 432 p.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dickie, G. Aesthetics. Philosophy of Meaning, Knowledge and Value in the Twentieth Century: Routledge History of Philosophy. Vol. 10 (ed. J. V. Canfield). London and New York: Routledge, 2005, pp. 269–291.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mamardašvili, M.Klassičeskij i neklassičeskij idealy racionalnosti. Moskva: Logos (Мамардашвили, М. Классический и неклассический идеалы рациональности. Москва: Логос), 2004. 238 p.Search in Google Scholar

13. McPherson, F.The Memory Key: Unlock the Secrets to Remembering. New Jersey: The Carrer Press, 2000. 222 p.Search in Google Scholar

14. Maturana, H. Biology of cognition, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980, pp. 5–58.10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4Search in Google Scholar

15. Jampolskij, M. K simvolike vodopada, Trudy po znakovym sistemam, tom 21, Tartu (Ямпольский, М. К символике водопада, Труды по знаковым системам, том 21, Тарту), 1987, pp. 26–41.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lo Sardo, E. E. Kircher’s Rome, Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything (ed. Paula Findlen). New York and London: Routledge, 2004, pp. 51–62.Search in Google Scholar

17. Petrušonis, V. „Žemės rojaus” idėja Lentvario dvaro sodybos parke. Acta academiae artium Vilnensis, T. 86–87, Vilnius (The Idea of Earthly Paradise in the Lentvaris Manor Park), 2017, pp. 51–63.Search in Google Scholar