[Beer, Frances (ed.). 1978. Julian of Norwich’s Revelations of Divine Love: The Shorter Version. (Middle English Texts 8.) Heidelberg: Winter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cockayne, Oswald (ed.). 1865. Leechdoms, wortcunning, and starcraft of early England, vol. 2. London: Longman, Green, Longmans, Roberts and Green.]Search in Google Scholar
[DOE = Dictionary of Old English: A to H online, edited by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Antonette diPaolo Healey et al. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project (http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doe/) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[DOE Web Corpus = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project (http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Kluge, Friedrich & Elmar Seebold. 2011. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. (25th edn.) Berlin: De Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpus DK. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab (http://ordnet.dk/korpusdk) [accessed 20 Apr 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Liebermann, Felix (ed.). 1903–16. Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen. (3 vols.) Halle a.S.: Niemeyer.]Search in Google Scholar
[MED = Middle English Dictionary, online edn. University of Michigan (http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Nichols, John Gough (ed.). 1860. The boke of noblesse. New York, NY: Burt Franklin. Online version published by Project Gutenberg (http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33953) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[ODS = Ordbog over det danske Sprog, online edn. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog-og Litteraturselskab (http://ordnet.dk/ods) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[OED = Oxford English dictionary, online edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press (http://www.oed.com) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Rix, Helmut. 2001. Lexicon der indogermanischen Verben. (2nd edn.) Wiesbaden: Reichert.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schröer, Arnold (ed.). 1885–88. Die angelsächsischen Prosabearbeitungen der Benediktinerregel. (2 vols.). Kassel; Wigand. [Repr. with appendix by Helmut Gneuss (Darmstadt 1964).]]Search in Google Scholar
[Toller, T. Northcote. 1921. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beths, Frank. 1999. The history of dare and the status of unidirectionality. Linguistics 37(6). 1069–1110. DOI: 10.1515/ling.37.6.106910.1515/ling.37.6.1069]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. (2nd edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duffley, Patrick J. 1994. Need and dare: The black sheep of the modal family. Lingua 94(4). 213–243. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(94)90010-810.1016/0024-3841(94)90010-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fischer, Olga. 2000. Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 149–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.53.08fis10.1075/slcs.53.08fis]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gregersen, Sune. 2017. ‘To dare larks’ in Early Modern English. Notes and Queries 64(4). 537–540. DOI: 10.1093/notesj/gjx15210.1093/notesj/gjx152]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hogg, Richard M. & Robert D. Fulk. 2011. A grammar of Old English. Vol. 2: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444327472]Search in Google Scholar
[Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110820980]Search in Google Scholar
[Leipzig Glossing Rules. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2009. The semantic predecessors of need in the history of English (c750–1710). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Los, Bettelou. 2015. A historical syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. (2 vols.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Molencki, Rafał. 2002. The status of dearr and þearf in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 38. 363–380.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molencki, Rafał. 2005. The confusion between thurven and durren in Middle English. In Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds.), Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and literary approaches, 147–160. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlander, Urban. 1941. A study on the use of the infinitive sign in Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 14(1–2). 58–66. DOI: 10.1080/0039327410858687110.1080/00393274108586871]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlüter, Julia. 2010. To dare to or not to: Is auxiliarization reversible? In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research, 289–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.94.11sch10.1075/tsl.94.11sch]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Taeymans, Martine. 2004. An investigation into the marginal modals dare and need in British present-day English. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline – The nature of grammaticalization, 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.59.06tae10.1075/tsl.59.06tae]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tomaszewska, Magdalena. 2014. On the auxiliary status of dare in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49(3). 63–77. DOI: 10.1515/stap-2015-000310.1515/stap-2015-0003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2001. Legitimate counterexamples to unidirectionality. Paper presented at Freiburg University, 17 October 2001 (http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/Freiburg.Unidirect.pdf) [accessed 20 April 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963–73. An historical syntax of the English language. (3 vols.) Leiden: Brill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752995]Search in Google Scholar
