Optimization of image quality in pulmonary CT angiography with low dose of contrast material

[1] Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2007;245(2):315-329.10.1148/radiol.2452070397Search in Google Scholar

[2] Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1760-1788.10.1056/NEJMoa042905Search in Google Scholar

[3] Righini M, Le Gal G, Aujesky D, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9621):1343-1352.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60594-2Search in Google Scholar

[4] Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:2317-2327.10.1056/NEJMoa052367Search in Google Scholar

[5] Horlander KT, Mannino DM, Leeper KV. Pulmonary embolism mortality in the United States, 1979-1998: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(14):1711-1717.10.1001/archinte.163.14.1711Search in Google Scholar

[6] Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilationperfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(4):1041-1047.10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741041Search in Google Scholar

[7] Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A, et al. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi- detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 2003;229(3):757-765.10.1148/radiol.2293020889Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997;205(2):447-452.10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356627Search in Google Scholar

[9] Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, et al. Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(2):407-411.10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750407Search in Google Scholar

[10] O’Neill J, Murchison JT, Wright L, et al. Effect of the introduction of helical CT on radiation dose in the investigation of pulmonary embolism. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(925):46-50.10.1259/bjr/53924376Search in Google Scholar

[11] O’Neill JM, Wright L, Murchison JT. Helical CTPA in the investigation of pulmonary embolism: a 6-year review. Clin Radiol. 2004;9(9):819-825.10.1016/j.crad.2004.02.011Search in Google Scholar

[12] Holmquist F, Hansson K, Pasquariello F, et al. Minimizing contrast medium doses to diagnose pulmonary embolism with 80-kVp multidetector computed tomography in azotemic patients. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(2):181-193.10.1080/02841850802657269Search in Google Scholar

[13] Holmquist F, Nyman U. Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(5):1165-1176.10.1007/s00330-005-0117-xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Szucs-Farkas Z, Kurmann L, Strautz T, et al. Patient exposure and image quality of low-dose pulmonary computed tomography angiography: comparison of 100- and 80-kVp protocols. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(12):871-876.10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181875e86Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology. 2003;227(3):809-816.10.1148/radiol.2273020102Search in Google Scholar

[16] Han JK, Kim AY, Lee KY, et al.. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2000;24(3):400-406.10.1097/00004728-200005000-00008Search in Google Scholar

[17] Schoellnast H, Deutschmann HA, Berghold A, et al. MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of body weight, body mass index, and scan length on arterial enhancement at different iodine flow rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(4):1074-1078.10.2214/AJR.05.0714Search in Google Scholar

[18] Dean PB, Violante MR, Mahoney JA. Hepatic CT contrast enhancement: effect of dose, duration of infusion, and time elapsed following infusion. Invest Radiol. 1980;15(2):158-161.10.1097/00004424-198003000-00012Search in Google Scholar

[19] Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Radiology. 1993;187(2):327-331.10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475268Search in Google Scholar

[20] Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM. Hepatic CT enhancement. I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. Radiology. 1994;193(2):513-517.10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972770Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Fischer U, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material. Radiology. 1996;201(2):321-326.10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888218Search in Google Scholar

[22] Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology. 2004;230(1):142-150.10.1148/radiol.2301021008Search in Google Scholar

[23] Bae KT, Heiken JP. Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl 5):E46-E59.10.1007/s10406-005-0165-ySearch in Google Scholar

[24] Erturk SM, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. Effect of duration of contrast material injection on peak enhancement times and values of the aorta, main portal vein, and liver at dynamic MDCT with the dose of contrast medium tailored to patient weight. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(3):263-271.10.1016/j.crad.2007.02.024Search in Google Scholar

[25] Dorio PJ, Lee Jr FT, Henseler KP, et al. Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:929-934.10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800929Search in Google Scholar

[26] Haage P, Schmitz-Rode T, Hübner D, et al. Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1049-1053.10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741049Search in Google Scholar