[Bel, Germà and Antón Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms get Rusty ? Local Privatization in Spain.” The Journal of Policy Reform 9(1), 1 – 24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bel, Germà and Xavier Fageda. 2011. “Big Guys Eat Big Cakes: Firm Size and Contracting in Urban and Rural Areas.” International Public Management Journal 14(1), 4 – 26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bel, Germà, Xavier Fageda and Melania Mur. 2014. “Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs ? Evidence from Residential Solid Waste Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1), 85 – 107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bel, Germà, Xavier Fageda and Mildred E. Warner. 2010. “Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public Production ? A Meta Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29(3), 553 – 577.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bel, Germà and Melania Mur. 2009. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Privatization and Waste Management Costs: Evidence from Rural Municipalities.” Waste Management 29(10), 2772 – 2778.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bel, Germà and Mildred Warner. 2008. “Does Privatization of Solid Waste and Water Services Reduce Costs ? A Review of Empirical Studies.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52(12), 1337 – 1348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benito, Bernardino, José Solana and María-Rocío Moreno. 2014. “Explaining Efficiency in Municipal Services Providers.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 42(3), 225 – 239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Callan, Scot J. and Janet M. Thomas. 2001. “Economies of Scale and Scope: A Cost Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Services.” Land Economics 77(4), 548 – 560.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csachová, Stela and Janette Nesorová-Dická. 2011. “Territorial Structure of Local Government in the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic and the Hungarian Republic: Comparative View.” Geografický časopis 63(3), 209 – 225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkgraaf, Elbert and Raymond Gradus. 2003. “Cost Savings of Contracting out Refuse Collection.” Empirica 30(2), 149 – 161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkgraaf, Elbert and Raymond Gradus. 2007. “Collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market.” Local Government Studies 33(4), 573 – 588.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkgraaf, Elbert and Raymond Gradus. 2013. “Cost Advantage Cooperations Larger than Private Waste Factors.” Applied Economics Letters 20(7), 702 – 705.]Search in Google Scholar
[Domberger, Simon, Shirley A. Meadowcroft and David J. Thompson. 1986. “Competitive Tendering and Efficiency: The Case of Refuse Collection.” Fiscal Studies 7(4), 69 – 87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Franzke, Jochen, Daniel Klimovský and Uroš Pinterič. 2016. “Does Inter-Municipal Cooperation Lead to Territorial Consolidation ? A Comparative Analysis of Selected European Cases in Times of Crisis.” In Sabine Kuhlmann and Geert Bouckaert (eds). Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons. Houndmills / New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 81 – 98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gradus, Raymond, Elbert Dijkgraaf and Martijn Schoute. 2016. “Is there still Collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market ?” Local Government Studies 42(5), 689 – 697.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gradus, Raymond, Elbert Dijkgraaf and Mattheus Wassenaar. 2014. “Understanding Mixed Forms of Refuse Collection, Privatization, and Its Reverse in the Netherlands.” International Public Management Journal 17(3), 328 – 343.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grafenauer, Božo and Mirko Klarić. 2011. “Alternative Service Delivery Arrangements at the Municipal Level in Slovenia and Croatia.” Lex localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 9(1), 67 – 83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirsch, Werner Z. 1965. “Cost Functions of an Urban Government Service: Refuse Collection.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 1965, 87 – 92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirkpatrick, Colin, David Parker and Yin-Fan Zhang. 2006. “An Empirical Analysis of State and Private-Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa.” The World Bank Economic Review 20(1), 143 – 163.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klimovský, Daniel. 2014. Inter-municipal Cooperation in Slovakia: The Case of Regions with Highly Fragmented Municipal Structure. Novo Mesto: Faculty of Organization Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lackowska, Marta. 2009. “Why is Voluntary Co-operation Condemned to Failure ? Reflections on the Polish and German Background.” Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 7(4), 347 – 369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lember, Veiko. 2004. “Limiting Aspects of Contracting out in Transitional Countries: The Case of Estonian Prisons.” Public Administration & Development 24(5), 425 – 435.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lombrano, Alessandro. 2009. “Cost Efficiency in the Management of Solid Urban Waste.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53(11), 601 – 611.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDavid, James C. 1985. “The Canadian Experience with Privatizing Residential Solid Waste Collection Services.” Public Administration Review 45(5), 602 – 608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikušová Meričková, Beáta and Juraj Nemec. 2013. “Factors Determining the Success of Contracting Local Public Services: Waste Collection and Waste Disposal, Management of Cemeteries in Slovakia.” Lex Localis 11(3), 375 – 386.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikušová Meričková, Beáta, Juraj Nemec and Jana Soukopová. 2014. “The Economics of Waste Management: Evidence from the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 12(3), 431 – 449.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, Juraj, Beáta Meričková and Leos Vitek. 2005. “Contracting-out at Local Government Level: Theory and Selected Evidence from Czech and Slovak Republics.” Public Management Review 7(4), 638 – 647.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, Juraj, Beáta Mikušová Meričková and Zuzana Vozárová. 2012. “Management of Contracting Public Services and its Quality in Slovakia.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1, 55 – 74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oakerson, Ronald J. 1999. Governing Local Public Economies. Oakland: ICS Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ochrana, František, Markéta Fantová Šumpíková, Jan Pavel, Juraj Nemec, Beáta Mikušová Meričková, Stanislav Klazar and Pavel Rousek. 2007. Efektivnost zabezpečování vybraných veřejných služebna úrovni obcí. Praha: Oeconomica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ochrana, František and Martin Nekola. 2009. “Economic Evaluation of Public Programs.” Ekonomický časopis 2009(5), 458 – 474.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlsson, Henry. 2003. “Ownership and Production Costs: Choosing between Public Production and Contracting-Out in the Case of Swedish Refuse Collection.” Fiscal Studies 24(4), 451 – 476.10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00091.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavel, Jan and Emília Sičáková-Beblavá. 2008. “Transparency of Public Procurement Market in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Ekonomický časopis 2(56), 168 – 181.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reeves, Eoin and Michael Barrow. 2000. “The Impact of Contracting out on the Costs of Refuse Collection Services: The Case of Ireland.” Economic and Social Review 31(2), 129 – 150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simões, Pedro and Rui Cunha Marques. 2012. “On the Economic Performance of the Waste Sector: A Literature Review.” Journal of Environmental Management 106, 40 – 47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sørensen, Rune J. 2007. “Does Dispersed Public Ownership Impair Efficiency ? The Case of Refuse Collection in Norway.” Public Administration 85(4), 1045 – 1058.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana and Ivan Malý. 2013. “Competitive Environment in Waste Management and its Impact on Municipal Expenditures.” Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 61(4), 1113 – 1119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana and Ivan Malý. 2012. “Vliv konkurence na výši výdajů na nakládání s odpady obcí Jihomoravského kraje.” In Waste Forum, No. 4. Praha: CEMC, 173 – 183.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana, Juraj Nemec, Lenka Matějová and Michal Struk. 2014. “Municipality Size and Local Public Services: Do Economies of Scale Exist ?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7(2), 151 – 171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana, František Ochrana, Daniel Klimovský and Beáta Mikušová Meričková. 2016. “Factors Influencing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipal Waste Management Expenditure.” Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 14(3), 361 – 380.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana and Gabriela Vaceková. 2015. “Competition and Municipal Waste Management Expenditure: Evidence from the Czech Republic, Olomouc Region.” Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D 22(35), 128 – 138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stevens, Barbara J. 1978. “Scale, Market Structure, and the Cost of Refuse Collection.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 60(3), 438 – 448.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szymanski, Stefan. 1996. “The Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering on Refuse Collection Services.” Fiscal Studies 17(3), 1 – 19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner, Mildred E. and Amir Hefetz. 2012. “Insourcing and Outsourcing: The Dynamics of Privatization among US Municipalities 2002 – 2007.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78(3), 313 – 327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wollmann, Hellmut. 2011. “Provision of Public Services in European Countries: From Public / Municipal to Private and Reverse ?” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 11(4), 889 – 910.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wollmann, Hellmut, Ivan Koprić and Gérard Marcou (eds). 2016. Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision. Houndmills / New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-57499-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Zafra-Gómez, Jose L., Diego Prior, Anna M. P. Díaz and Antonio M. López-Hernández. 2013. “Reducing Costs in Times of Crisis: Delivery Forms in Small and Medium Sized Local Governments’ Waste Management Services.” Public Administration 91(1), 51 – 68.]Search in Google Scholar
