Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends

1. Algan, Y., Murtin, F., Beasley E., Higa, K., Senik, C. (2019). Correction: Well-Being Through the Lens of the Internet // PLoS ONE. Vol. 14, No. 1, e0211586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.021158610.1371/journal.pone.0211586Search in Google Scholar

2. Bailey, S. J. (2011). The Evolving Governance of Public Services in England: Extending Competition, Choice, Co-design and Co-production // Innovation and Public Sector. Vol. 15: Innovations in Public Governance, pp. 68-88. doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-727-7-6810.3233/978-1-60750-727-7-68Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Bel, G., Hebdon, R., Warner, M. (2018). Beyond Privatisation and Cost Savings: Alternatives for Local Government Reform // Local Government Studies. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2018.142819010.1080/03003930.2018.1428190Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value // Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1119–1138. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9309-610.1007/s11266-012-9309-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Brudney, J. L. (1987). Coproduction and Privatization: Exploring the Relationship and Its Implications // Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 11–21. doi: 10.1177/08997640870160030310.1177/089976408701600303Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Danish Competition and Consumer Authority (2016). Public sector activities in commercial markets. Internet access: <https://www.en.kfst.dk/analyser/kfst/publikationer/engelsk/2016/20160526-regulation-for-public-players-on-commercial-markets/>, [accessed May 6, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

7. Dehkordy, S. F., Carlos, R. C., Hall, K. S., Dalton, V. K. (2014). Novel Data Sources for Women’s Health Research: Mapping Breast Screening Online Information Seeking Through Google Trends // Acad Radiol. Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1172–1176. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.00510.1016/j.acra.2014.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. European Commission (2016). State-Owned Enterprises in the EU: Lesson Learnt and Ways Forward in a Post-Crisis Context. Institutional Paper 031. Internet access: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/ip031_en_2.pdf>, [accessed May 7, 2019].Search in Google Scholar

9. Lindgren, S. (2010). YouTube Gunmen? Mapping Participatory Media Discourse on School Shooting Videos // Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1177/016344371038652710.1177/0163443710386527Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Maas, B. (2019). Short-Term Forecasting of the US Unemployment Rate. MPRA Paper No. 94066.10.1002/for.2630Search in Google Scholar

11. Mellon, J. (2014). Internet Search Data and Issue Salience: The Properties of Google Trends as a Measure of Issue Salience // Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 45–72. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.84634610.1080/17457289.2013.846346Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Mira, J. J., Carrillo, I., Navarro I. M., Guilabert, M., Vitaller, J., Pérez-Jover, V., Aguado H. (2018). Public Participation in Health. A Review of Reviews // Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra. Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 91–106. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.017210.23938/ASSN.0172Search in Google Scholar

13. Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., et al. (2014). The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review // PLoS ONE. Vol. 9, No. 10. e109583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010958310.1371/journal.pone.0109583Search in Google Scholar

14. Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment? // Public Management Review. Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 639–653. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.111192710.1080/14719037.2015.1111927Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Pestoff, V. (2014). Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production // Public Management Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 383–401. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.84146010.1080/14719037.2013.841460Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Co-creation and Open Innovation: Systematic Literature Review // Comunicar. Vol. 26, No. 54. doi:10.3916/C54-2018-0110.3916/C54-2018-01Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., Ruffini, R. (2016). Public Services Management and Co-Production in Multi-Level Governance Settings // International Review of Administrative Science. Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 8–27. doi: 10.1177/002085231456600810.1177/0020852314566008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding Co-Production as a New Public Governance Tool // Policy and Society. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 277–293. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2018.152167610.1080/14494035.2018.1521676Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Talbot, C. R. (2011). Paradoxes and Prospects of ‘Public Value’ // Public Money & Management. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 27–34. doi. 10.1080/09540962.2011.54554410.1080/09540962.2011.545544Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Vanleene, D., Verschuere, B., Voets, J. (2015). Benefits and Risks of Co-Production. A Preliminary Literature Review. – Paper for the IIAS Conference on co-production of public services.Search in Google Scholar

21. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tõnurist, P., Tummers, L. (2017). Does Co-creation Impact Public Service Delivery? The Importance of State and Governance Traditions // Public Money & Management. Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 365–372. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.132879810.1080/09540962.2017.1328798Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., Zhu, D. (2018). Public–Private Partnership in Public Administration Discipline: A Literature Review // Public Management Review. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 293–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.131344510.1080/14719037.2017.1313445Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Xue, M., Harker, P. T. (2003). Service Co-Production, Customer Efficiency and Market Competition. – Working paper, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar