Acceso abierto

Electron spin resonance signals of quartz in present-day river bed sediments and possible source rocks in the Kizu River basin, Western Japan


Cite

Location map showing sample sites for the present-day river bed sediments and the possible source rocks around the Kizu River, Japan.R1 – Muro pyroclastic flow deposits;R2 – Metamudstone with sandstone;R3 – Ao granite;R4 – Yagyu granite;R5 – Shigaraki granite;S1–S7 – Present-day river bed sediments.
Location map showing sample sites for the present-day river bed sediments and the possible source rocks around the Kizu River, Japan.R1 – Muro pyroclastic flow deposits;R2 – Metamudstone with sandstone;R3 – Ao granite;R4 – Yagyu granite;R5 – Shigaraki granite;S1–S7 – Present-day river bed sediments.

Al and Ti–Li center signals observed at 77 K for quartz in the Muro pyroclastic flow deposits. (A) Al center signal intensity. (B) Ti–Li center signal intensity.
Al and Ti–Li center signals observed at 77 K for quartz in the Muro pyroclastic flow deposits. (A) Al center signal intensity. (B) Ti–Li center signal intensity.

Comparison of additive dose curves of Al and Ti–Li centers. (A) Al center signal intensity. (B) Ti–Li center signal intensity.
Comparison of additive dose curves of Al and Ti–Li centers. (A) Al center signal intensity. (B) Ti–Li center signal intensity.

Change in the Al versus Ti–Li center signal intensities for quartz caused by changing the mixing ratio of the samples (samples R1 and R5; n = 5).
Change in the Al versus Ti–Li center signal intensities for quartz caused by changing the mixing ratio of the samples (samples R1 and R5; n = 5).

Al versus Ti–Li center signal intensities for quartz from the present-day river bed sediments and possible source rocks.
Al versus Ti–Li center signal intensities for quartz from the present-day river bed sediments and possible source rocks.

Sample numbers and names, and ESR signal intensities.

SampleNameAl center signal intensity (a.u.)Ti–Li center signal intensity (a.u.)
R1Muro pyroclastic flow deposits384 ± 11.872 ± 0.3
R2Metamudstone with sandstone217 ± 3.224 ± 0.6
R3Ao granite210 ± 6.12 ± 0.1
R4Yagyu granite89 ± 1.317 ± 0.5
R5Shigaraki granite82 ± 2.16 ± 0.1
S1Present river sediment-1225 ± 10.136 ± 1.0
S2Present river sediment-2219 ± 7.528 ± 1.1
S3Present river sediment-3286 ± 3.942 ± 0.9
S4Present river sediment-4192 ± 6.121 ± 1.0
S5Present river sediment-5226 ± 5.328 ± 2.0
S6Present river sediment-6206 ± 5.822 ± 0.9
S7Present river sediment-7177 ± 7.524 ± 1.7

Mixing ratios of the present-day river bed sediments and ESR signal intensities of the samples.

SampleMajor possible source rocks and sedimentsMixting ratio (%) estimated from Al center signal intensitiesMixting ratio (%) estimated from Ti-Li center signal intensities
S1R1523
R29577
S2R118
R29992
S3R142
R249
R39
S4R1–16
R2137
R3–21
S5R15
R2102
R3–7
S5S33633
S46467
S6R286
R36
R48
S7R268
R453
R5–21

ESR signal intensities of artificially mixed samples created by mixing samples R1 and R5 (n = 5).

R1 mixting ratio (%)R5 mixting ratio (%)Al center signal intensity (a.u.)Ti–Li center signal intensity (a.u.)
Estimated data257515822
505023339
752530955
Experimental data0100826
257517423
505023938
752529055
100038472
eISSN:
1897-1695
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
Volume Open
Temas de la revista:
Geosciences, other