Cite

1. Wiley, D. Open Content. http://opencontent.org/definition/.Search in Google Scholar

2. Blair, B. S. Faculty Survey Finds Awareness of Open Educational Resources Low. Babson College, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

3. Florida Virtual Campus. Florida Student Textbook Survey. Tallahassee, FL, 2012. http://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/pdf/2012_Exec_Sum_Fac_Admin_OER_Survey.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

4. Recommendations to Save on Student Textbook Costs. The Ad Hoc Senate Committee on Student Textbook Savings. 2014.http://www.lib.utah.edu/pdf/TextbookSavingsReport_FINAL.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

5. Dicheva, D., C. Dichev. Finding Open Educational Resources in Computing. – In: ICALT’14, 2014, Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICALT.2014.17Search in Google Scholar

6. Geser, G. Open Educational Practices and Resources. Salzburg Research. EduMedia Group.Search in Google Scholar

7. Johnson, L., S. A. Becker, M. Cummins, V. Estrada, A. Freeman, H. Ludgate. NMC Horizon Report: Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas, The New Media Consortium, 2013. http://www.nmc.org/horizon-projectSearch in Google Scholar

8. Mulder, F., B. Janssen. Opening up Education. – In: Trend Report OER. SURF SIG OER, Utrecht, 2013, pp. 36-42.Search in Google Scholar

9. Abelson, H. The Creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. – J. of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 17, 2007, No 2, pp. 164-174.10.1007/s10956-007-9060-8Search in Google Scholar

10. Faculty Like OER, When They Know About It, Degreed. http://degreed.com/blog/faculty-like-oer-know/Search in Google Scholar

11. Cheung, S. K. S., K. C. Li, K. S. Yuen. An Overview of Open Educational Resources for Higher Education. – In: Intl. Conference on ICT in Teaching and Learning, HKU Space, 2013.10.1007/978-3-642-45272-7_3Search in Google Scholar

12. Downes, S. Access2OER: The CCK08 Solution, 16 February 2009. http://halfanhour.blogspot.ca/2009/02/access2oer-cck08-solution.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

13. Pappano, L. The Year of the MOOC. New York Times, 2 November 2012.Search in Google Scholar

14. Who Wants to Take College Courses for FREE? Leaders in the MOOC Movement, Affordable Degrees Online, 2014. http://www.affordabledegreesonline.org/blog/who-wants-to-take-college-courses-for-free-leaders-in-the-mooc-movement/Search in Google Scholar

15. OECD. Giving Knowledge for Free. The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

16. Didderen, W., P. Sloep. OER and Informal Learning. – Trend Report Open Educational Resources, Amsterdam: Open Educational Resources Special Interest Group, Vol. 20, 2013, No 15.Search in Google Scholar

17. Anson, A. Open Courseware Statistics [Infographic]. October 2011. http://ansonalex.com/infographics/opencourseware-statistics-infographic/Search in Google Scholar

18. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program Evaluation Findings Summary, 2011. http://ocw.mit.edu/about/site-statistics/11_Eval_Summary_112311_MITOCW.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

19. Kendrick, C. Testimony of University Dean Curtis Kendrick to NYC Council on Textbook Affordability. CUNY, Library News, September 2014.Search in Google Scholar

20. Margaryan, A., A. Littlejohn. Repositories and Communities at Cross Purposes: Issues in Sharing and Reuse of Digital Learning Resources. – JCAL, Vol. 24, 2007, No 4, pp. 333-347.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.xSearch in Google Scholar

21. Fetter, S., A. J. Berlanga, P. Sloep. Peer-Support and Open Educational Resources. – In: A. L. P. Okada et al., Eds. Collaborative Learning 2.0: Open Educational Resources. Washington, DC, IGI Global Publishing, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

22. Simon, H. Changing Course. 10 Years of Tracking Online Education [Infographic], Edcetera, April 2013. http://edcetera.rafter.com/changing-course-10-years-of-tracking-online-education-infographic/Search in Google Scholar

23. Gaebel, M. MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses. European University Association. January 2013. http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publication/EUA_Occasional_papers_MOOCs.sflb.ashxSearch in Google Scholar

24. Adamovica, L. To MOOC or Not to MOOC: Strategic Lessons from the Pioneers. Slide Share. http://www.slideshare.net/InsideTrackCoaching/ace-insidetrackmoocstrategystudyinfographic-moocSearch in Google Scholar

25. Verstelle, M., M. Schreuder, H. Jelgerhu is. Recognition of MOOCs in the Education Sector. – In: 2014 Open Education Trend Report: SURF’s Open Education Special Interest Group, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

26. MOOCs' Next Phase: Global System for Credential Recognition. MOOCs University. SlideShares. 2014. http://www.slideshare.net/MOOCsUniversity/moocs-next-phase-global-central-system-for-credential-recogntionSearch in Google Scholar

27. Listing of University and Colleges Offering OER. http://libguides.tcc.edu/content.php?pid=552069&sid=4550325Search in Google Scholar

28. Lerner, J., J. Tirole. Some Simple Economics of Open Source. – Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 2, 2002, pp. 197-234.10.1111/1467-6451.00174Search in Google Scholar

29. Weber, S. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2004.10.4159/9780674044999Search in Google Scholar

30. Kamenetz, A. How Coursera, a Free Online Education Service, Will School Us All. Fast Company, August 2012. http://www.fastcompany.com/3000042/how-coursera-free-online-education-service-will-school-us-allSearch in Google Scholar

31. King, W. J., M. Nanfito. MOOCs for the Rest of US: An Inside Higher Ed. Webinar. National Institute for Technology in Liberal Education.Search in Google Scholar

32. European MOOCs Scoreboard Open Education Europa. http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/european_scoreboard_moocsSearch in Google Scholar

33. http://blog.coursera.org/post/73994272513/coursera-specializations-focused-programs-inSearch in Google Scholar

34. Simian, P. Prereqs – not MOOC-Wrecks! Hitting the Books. Class Central, October 2014. https://www.class-central.com/report/prereqs-mooc-wrecks-hitting-books/Search in Google Scholar

35. Hibbets, J. Coursefork: A New Way to Collaborate on Open Education. Red Hat. September 2013. http://opensource.com/education/13/9/coursefork-education-toolSearch in Google Scholar

36. Computer Science Students: Apply to Mentor with OER Foundation for Google Summer of Code. Bccampus, 2014. bccampus.ca/2014/02/26/computer-science-students-apply-to-mentor-with-oer-foundation-for-google-summer-of-code/Search in Google Scholar

37. Remmele, B. Open Educational Resources – Anonymity vs. Specificity. – European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 2006, No 2.Search in Google Scholar

38. Clements, K., J. M. Pawlowski. User-Oriented Quality for OER: Understanding Teachers’ Views on Re-Use, Quality, and Trust. – J. of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 28, 2012, No 1, pp. 4-14.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.xSearch in Google Scholar

39. Schuwer, R., B. Janssen, W. van Valkenburg. MOOCs: Trends and Opportunities for Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

40. Jacobs, B. OER Beyond Voluntarism. Inside Higher Ed., 2014. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/08/28/open-educational-resources-movement-needs-move-beyond-voluntarism-essaySearch in Google Scholar

41. Frydenberg, J., G. Matkin, D. L. Center. Open Textbooks: Why? What? How? When? Menlo Park, CA, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

42. Fixing the Broken Textbook Market Report by U.S. PIRG Education Fund., January 2014. http://www.uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/NATIONAL%20Fixing%20Broken%20Textbooks%20Report1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

43. Open Assembly Beta: OER Meets Web 2.0. blog.openassembly.com/2014/12/03/open-assembly-oer-meets-web-20/Search in Google Scholar

44. Characteristics and Potential of Github for Education. Open Tapestry, 02/19/2013. blog.opentapestry.com/2013/02/19/characteristics-and-potential-of-github-for-education/Search in Google Scholar

45. Robinson, T. J., L. Fischer, D. A. Wiley, J. Hilton. The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary Science Learning Outcomes. – Educational Researcher, Vol. 43, 2014, No 7, pp. 341-351.10.3102/0013189X14550275Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1314-4081
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Computer Sciences, Information Technology