Acceso abierto

ASEM’s First Two Decades: A Role Discovered

   | 07 nov 2019

Cite

ASEM (1996), Chairman’s Statement of the First Asia–Europe Meeting, Bangkok, 1–2 March. Retrieved from http://www.aseminfoboard.org/sites/default/files/documents/1996%20-%20ASEM1%20-%20Chair%20Statement.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]Search in Google Scholar

ASEM (1998), Chairman’s Statement of the Second Asia–Europe Meeting, London, 3–4 April. Retrieved from http://www.aseminfoboard.org/sites/default/files/documents/1998%20-%20ASEM2%20-%20Chair%20Statement.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]Search in Google Scholar

CAEC (1997), The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia–Europe Cooperation, CAEC Task Force Reports, London: Council for Asia–Europe Cooperation.Search in Google Scholar

Cammack, P. (1999), ‘Interpreting ASEM: Interregionalism and new materialism,’ Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354786990872466810.1080/13547869908724668Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Camroux, D. & Lechervy, C. (1996), ‘‘Close Encounter of a Third Kind?’ The Inaugural Asia-Europe meeting of March 1996,’ The Pacific Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274960871919610.1080/09512749608719196Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission (COM (1994) 314 final) to the Council Towards a New Asia Strategy, Brussels, 13.07.1994. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/2949/1/2949.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, J. A. & Fiorentino, R. V. (2005), The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, Discussion Paper, no. 8, Geneva: WTO Secretariat.Search in Google Scholar

Dent, C. M. (1999), ‘The EU–East Asia economic relationship: the persisting weak triadic link?’ European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 371–394.10.54648/EERR1999037Search in Google Scholar

Doidge, M. (2011), The European Union and Interregionalism: Patterns of Engagement, Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Doidge, M. (2013), ‘New Zealand and the Asia-Europe Meeting,’ Asia Europe Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-013-0347-510.1007/s10308-013-0347-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

European Council (1995), ‘Madrid European Council: Conclusions of the Presidency,’ Bulletin of the European Union, no. 12, pp. 9–51.Search in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2001), ‘Intra-EU investment increased by 50% in 2000,’ News Release, no. 74/2001, 6 July.Search in Google Scholar

Forster, A. (1999), ‘The European Union in South-East Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times,’ International Affairs, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.0010610.1111/1468-2346.00106Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hänggi, H. (1999), ‘ASEM and the construction of the new triad,’ Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354786990872467010.1080/13547869908724670Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hänggi, H. (2003), ‘Regionalism through interregionalism: East Asia and ASEM,’ in L. Fu-Kuo & P. Régnier (eds.) Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting? London: Routledge, pp. 197–219.Search in Google Scholar

Hänggi, H. (2006), ‘Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: in search of a typology,’ in H. Hänggi, R. Roloff & J. Rüland (eds.) Interregionalism and International Relations, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 31–62.Search in Google Scholar

Maitland, D. & Hu, Y. S. (1998), Europe and Emerging Asia, London: Federal Trust.Search in Google Scholar

Pou Serradell, V. (1996), ‘The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): a historical turning point in relations between the two regions,’ European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 185–210.10.54648/EERR1996013Search in Google Scholar

Ruigrok, W. & van Tulder, R. (1995), The Logic of International Restructuring, London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Rüland, J. (1999), Transregional Relations: The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) – A Functional Analysis, Paper presented to the International Conference on Asia and Europe on the Eve of the 21st Century, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 19–20 August.Search in Google Scholar

Stubbs, R. (2002), ‘ASEAN Plus Three: emerging East Asian regionalism?’ Asian Survey, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.3.44010.1525/as.2002.42.3.440Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

The World Bank (2005), Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism, and Development, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Wendt, A. (1994), ‘Collective identity formation and the international state,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 384–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/294471110.2307/2944711Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yeo, L. H. (2003), Asia and Europe: The Development and Different Dimensions of ASEM, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020360999610.4324/9780203609996Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yeung, M. T.; Perdikis, N. & Kerr, W. A. (1999), Regional Trading Blocs in the Global Economy: The EU and ASEAN, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2228-0596
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Computer Sciences, other, Business and Economics, Political Economics, Law, Social Sciences