[Andersen M.C., Ewald M. & Northcott J. 2005. Risk analysis and management decisions for weed biological control agents: Ecological theory and modeling results. Biol. Control. 35: 330-337.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Anonymus 2004. Environmental Protection Act 1990. Published by The Stationery Office Ltd., UK, 245 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anonymus 2010. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLEVA). Upper Columbia River., Parametrix, Inc. 421 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Asker S. 2011. Ecotoxicological test methodology for environmental screening of the European Water Framework Directive's priority substances adjusted to Swedish regional. Degree project in biology. Biology Education Centre, Uppsala Universitet, 113 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breitholtz M., Rudén Ch., Hansson S.O. & Bengtsson B.-E. 2006. Ten challenges for improved ecotoxicological testing in environmental risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 63: 324-335.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.12.00916406525]Search in Google Scholar
[Botsford J.L. 2002. A comparison of ecotoxicological tests. Altern. Lab. Anim. 30: 539-550.10.1177/02611929020300050712432890]Search in Google Scholar
[Cormier S., Norton S., Suter G. & Reed-Judkins D. 2000. Stressor Identification Guidance Document. EPA/822/B-00/025. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460]Search in Google Scholar
[Covello V.T. & Merkhofer M.W. 1993. Risk Assessment Methods: Approaches for Assessing Health and Environmental Risks. 2nd Edition, Springer, 319 p.10.1007/978-1-4899-1216-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Dupras D.M., Edson R.S., Halvorsen A.J., Hopkins R.H. Jr. & McDonald F.S. 2012. Problem residents: prevalence, problems and remediation in the era of core competencies. Am. J. Med. 125: 421-425.10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Dwyer F.J., Dwyer J.J., Doane T.R. & Hinman M.L. 1997. Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Modeling and Risk Assessment, Vol. 6. ASTM Committee E-47 on Biological Effects and Environmental Fate. ASTM International, 564 p.10.1520/STP1317-EB]Search in Google Scholar
[Jänsch S., Amorim M.J. & Römbke J. 2005. Identification of the ecological requirements of important terrestrial ecotoxicological test species. Environ. Rev. 13: 51-83.10.1139/a05-007]Search in Google Scholar
[Lerche I. & Glässer W. 2006. Environmental Risk Assessment: Quantitative Measures, Anthropogenic Influences, Human Impact. Springer, Berlin, 343 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paustenbach D.J. (ed.) 2002. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Theory and Practice. Hazard identification. Chapter 2. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY, pp. 85-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[SETAC 2004. Ecological Risk Assessment. 3rd Edition, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA, 4 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suter G.W. & Barnthouse L.W. 2006. Ecological Risk Assessment. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, 643 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suter G.W., Vermeire T., Munns W.R. & Sekizawa J. 2001. Framework for the integration of health and ecological assessment. In: WHO/PCS/IRA 2001. Integrated Risk Assessment. WHO/UNEP/ILO The International Programme on Chemical Safety, pp. 1-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suter G.W., Vermeire T., Munns W.R. & Sekizawa J. 2005. An integrated framework for health and ecological risk assessment. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 207: 611-616.10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.05115993452]Search in Google Scholar
[UNEP/IPCS 1999. Chemical Risk Assessment. Human Risk Assessment and Ecological Risk Assessment. WHO/PCS/99.2 UNEP, Geneva, Switzerland Section A, B, C, 222 p. http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/Publications/riskasse/C2text.pdf; http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/Publications/riskasse/B2text.pdf; http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/Publications/riskasse/A2A4Txtab.PDF (Retrieved August 20, 2015)]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 1992. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington DC 20460, 41 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 1996. Peer Review Workshop Report on Draft Proposed Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-96/002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC 20460]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC 20460]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 2000. Stressor Identification Guidance Document. EPA/822/B-00/025. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water, Washington, DC 20460, 228 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 2003. Generic Ecological Assessment Endpoints (GEAEs) for Ecological Risk Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC 20460, 59 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 2004. Generic Ecological Assessment Endpoints (GEAEs) EPA/630/P-02/004F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC 20460]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 2008. Ecological Risk Assessment. Guidance Document DERR-00-RR-031. Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Environmental Response and Revitalization, State of Ohio, 130 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[U.S. EPA 2012. Sustainable Futures/P2 Framework Manual 2012. EPA-748-B12-001. 13. Quantitative Risk Assessment Calculations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC 20460]Search in Google Scholar