[1. Alessandri, S.W.; Yang, S.-U.; Kinsey, D.F. (2006). An Integrative Approach to University Visual Identity and Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(4), 258-270.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550033]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Balmer, J.M.T. (1997). Corporate identity: what of it, why the confusion, and what’s next? Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1/2), 183-188.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540041]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Barnett, M., L.; Jermier, J.M.; Lafferty, B.A. (2006), Corporate reputation: the definitional landscape, Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26-38.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012]Search in Google Scholar
[4 Bromley, D.B. (1993). Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Brown, B.; Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune´s ´most admired´ companies, Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1347-1360.10.5465/256676]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Calas, M.; Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 649-671.10.5465/amr.1999.2553246]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility? In: Law. J. (Ed.). A Sociology of Monsters? (132-161), London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chen, C.-C.; Otubanjo, O. (2013). A functional perspective to the meaning of corporate reputation. The Marketing Review, 13(4), 329-345.10.1362/146934713X13832199716741]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91-109.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00109.x]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Courtney, J.; Croasdell, D.; Paradice, D. (1998). Inquiring Organisations. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 3-14.10.3127/ajis.v6i1.313]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Davies, G.; Chun, R.; da Silva, R.; Roper, S. (2002). Corporate reputation and competiveness. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Deephouse, D.L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource, Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091-1112.10.1177/014920630002600602]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Devine, I.; Halpern, P. (2001). Implicit Claims: the Role of Corporate Reputation in Value Creation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 42-49.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540131]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Dowling, G.; Moran, P. (2012). Corporate Reputations: Built In or Bolted On? California Management Review, 54(2), 25-42.10.1525/cmr.2012.54.2.25]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Duton, J.E.; Dukerich, J.M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517-554.10.2307/256405]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Eichhorn, P. (1991). Konstitutive Merkmale von Non Profit Unternehmen. In: D. Witt et al. (red.). Non-Profit-Unternehmen im Aufwind? (45-52). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Erhardt, D. (2011). Hochschulen im strategischen Wettbewerb - Empirische Analyse der horizontalen Differenzierung deutscher Hochschulen. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-8349-7114-2]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Finholt, T.A. (2003). Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 5-25.10.1080/10438590303119]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Fombrun, C.J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Fombrun, C.J.; van Riel, C.B. (2003). Reputation und Unternehmensergebnis - zentrale Resultate einer empirischen Studie. In: Wiedmann, K.-P.: Heckemüller, C. (ed.). Ganzheitliches Corporate Finance Management (pp. 291-298). Wiesbaden: Gabler.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Fombrun, C.J.; Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), pp. 233-258.10.2307/256324]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Fombrun, C.; Wiedmann, K.P. (2001). Reputation quotient (RQ). Analyse und Gestaltung der Unternehmensreputation auf der Basis fundierter Erkenntnisse. Hannover: Schriftenreihe Marketing Management.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Formbrun, C.; Gardberg, N.A.; Sever, J.W. (2000). The Reputation Quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), pp. 241-255.10.1057/bm.2000.10]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Fryxell, G.F.; Wang, J. (1994). The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20(1), 1-14.10.1177/014920639402000101]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzmann, S.; Scott, P.; Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The dynamic of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Gibson, D.; Gonzales, J.L.; Castanon, J. (2006). The importance of reputation and the role of public relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(3), 15-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Gotsi, M.; Wilson, A.M. (2001). Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition. Corporate Communications, 6(1), 24-30.10.1108/13563280110381189]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Gray, E.R. (1986). Managing the Corporate Image. Westport: Quorum.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Gray, E.R.; Balmer, J.M.R. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation, Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695-702.10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00074-0]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Grochla, E. (1972). Unternehmensorganisation, Neue Ansätze und Konzeptionen. Reinbek: Rowohlt Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Grunig, J.E.; Hung, C.F. (2002). The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: A cognitive, behavioural study. Paper presented at the PRSA Educator’s Academy 5th Annual International, Interdisciplinary Public Relations Research Conference. Miami.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Gutenberg, A. (1983). Grundlagen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Band 1: Die Produktion. 24. Ed. Berlin: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Hoyle, E. (1982). Micropolitics of Educational Organisations, Educational Management and Administration, 10, 87-98.10.1177/174114328201000202]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Institute of Directors (IOD) (1999). Reputation Management: Strategies for Protecting Companies, their Brands and their Directors. London: Directors Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Kehm, B. (2012). Hochschulen als besondere und unvollständige Organisation? Neue Theorien zur „Organisation Hochschule”. In: U. Wilkesmann, C.J. Schmid (Ed.) (2012). Hochschule als Organisation (17-25). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kieser, A.; Kubicek, H. Organisationstheorien I + II. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Kieser, A.; Walgenbach, P. (2010). Organisation. 6. Ed., Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschel-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Kosiol, E. (1962). Organisation der Unternehmung. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-663-13161-8]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Kotler, P.; Fox, K.F. (1985). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 54, 379-393.10.1007/BF01059830]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. 1. Ed. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Mayntz, R. (1963). Soziologie der Organisation. Reinbek: Rowohlt Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Middleton, S.; Hanson, D. (2003). Corporate Reputation and Scientific Reputation: The Mysterious Case of Girad and Agassiz. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(2), 147-160.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540196]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Müller-Jentsch, W. (2003). Organisationssoziologie. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Musselin, C. (2006). Are Universities Specific Organisations? In: Krücken, G.; Kosmützky, A., Torka, M. (Ed.), Towards a Multiversity. Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions (pp. 63-84), Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Musselin, C. (2006). Are Universities specific organisations?. In: G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, M. Torka (Eds.). Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Globoal Trends and national Traditions (63-84). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Nickel, S. (2012). Engere Kopplung von Wissenschaft und Verwaltung und ihre Folgen für die Ausübung professioneller Rollen in Hochschulen (279-292). In: U. Wilkesmann, C.J. Schmid. (2012). Hochschule als Organisation. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29-44.10.1002/smj.4250150904]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Redler, J. (2013). Grundzüge des Marketings [Fundamentals of Marketing]. Berlin: BWV.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Ressler, J.; Abratt, R. (2009). Assessing the impact of university reputation on stakeholder intentions. Journal of General Management 35(1), 35-45.10.1177/030630700903500104]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Schimank, U. (2000). Handeln und Strukturen. Einführung in die akteurstheoretische Soziologie. 2. Ed. Weinheim: Juventa.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Schimank, U. (2001). Organisationsgesellschaft. In: G. Kneer, A. Nassehi, M. Schroer (Ed.). Klassische Gesellschaftsbegriffe der Soziologie (278-307). München: UTB.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Schimank, U. (2002). Organisationen: Akteurskonstellationen - korporative Akteure - Sozialsysteme. In: J. Allmendinger; T. Hinz, (red.). Organisationssoziologie. Sonderheft 42 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (29-54). Wiesbaden: WV.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Schimank, U. (2003). Handeln in Institutionen und handelnde Institutionen (293-307). In: F. Jaeger; F., J. Straub (red.). Handbuch der Kulturwissenschaften. Bd. 2. Stuttgart: Metzler.]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Schimank, U. (2007). Organisationstheorien (200-211). In: A. Benz, U. Schimank, U., S. Lütz, (Ed.): Handbuch Governance. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Schreyögg, G. (2008). Organisation. Grundlagen moderner Organisationsgestaltung. 5. Ed. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-8349-8152-3]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Schultz, M.; Mouritsen, J.; Gabrielsen, G. (2001). Sticky reputation: analyzing a ranking system. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 24-41.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540130]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory (391). In: D. Gilbert; S. Fiske; G. Lindzey (Ed.). The handbook of social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Sojkin, B. (2015). Determinant factors of the marketing activity of scientific and research institutions, MINIB Marketing of Science and Research Organizations, 15(1), 19-32, online on: http://minib.pl/category/no-1-2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Terblance, N.S. (2009). Customer experiences, interactions, relationships and corporate reputation: a conceptual approach. Journal of General Management, 35(1), 5-17.10.1177/030630700903500102]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Theus, K.T. (1993). Academic reputations: The process of formation and decay. Public Relations Review, 19(3), 277-291.10.1016/0363-8111(93)90047-G]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Vahs, D. (2012). Organisation. 8. Ed. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Walker, K. (2010). A systematic Review of the Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357-387.10.1057/crr.2009.26]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Walsh, G.; Mitchell, V.-W.; Jackson, P.R.; Beatty, S.E. (2008). Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Reputation: A Customer Perspective. British Academy of Management, 20, 187-203.]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Walsh, G.; Wiedmann K.-P. (2004). A Conceptualization of Corporate Reputation in Germany: An Evaluation and Extension of the RQ. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4), 304-312.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540001]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Wiedmann K.-P. (2014). Erkenntnisse des Reputationmanagement als Basis für ein Controlling des Corporate Brand Management nutzen. In: F.-R. Esch; T. Tomczak; J. Kernstock; T. Langner; J. Redler (Eds.). Corporate Brand Management. Wiesbaden: Springer-Gabler, 607-629.]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Wiedmann, K.-P.; Prauschke, C. (2005). The Relationship between Corporate Reputation and Intangible Assets. Hannover: Schriftenreihe Marketing Management.]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Yang, S.-U.; Grunig, J.E. (2005). Decomposing organisational reputation: The effects of organisation-public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organisations and evaluations of organisational performance. Journal of Communication Management, 9(4), 305-325.10.1108/13632540510621623]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Zechlin, L. (2012). Zwischen Interessenorganisation und Arbeitsorganisation? Wissenschaftsfreiheit, Hierarchie und Partizipation in der „unternehmerischen Hochschule” (41-60). In: U. Wilkesmann; C.J. Schmid (red.) (2012). Hochschule als Organisation. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
